What are women's mode of birth preferences and why? A systematic scoping review

被引:47
作者
Coates, Dominiek [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Thirukumar, Purshaiyna [2 ]
Spear, Virginia [4 ]
Brown, Georgia [1 ]
Henry, Amanda [2 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Technol Sydney, Fac Hlth, Ctr Midwifery & Child & Family Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] UNSW, Sch Womens & Childrens Hlth, UNSW Med, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Sydney Partnership Hlth Educ Res & Enterprise SPH, Maridulu Budyari Gumal, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] South Eastern Sydney Local Hlth Dist, Royal Hosp Women, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[5] St George Hosp, Dept Womens & Childrens Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[6] UNSW Med, George Inst Global Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Caesarean section; Mode of birth preferences; Shared decision-making; Childbirth fear; Vaginal birth; PREVIOUS CESAREAN-SECTION; DECISION-MAKING; MATERNAL REQUEST; VAGINAL DELIVERY; PREGNANT-WOMEN; MEDICAL INDICATIONS; CHILDBIRTH FEAR; CHOICE; PERCEPTION; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.wombi.2019.09.005
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: The optimal caesarean section rate is estimated to be between 10-15%; however, it is much higher in high and many middle-income countries and continues to be lower in some middle and low-income countries. While a range of factors influence caesarean section rates, women's mode of birth preferences also play a role. The aim of this study was to map the literature in relation to women's mode of birth preferences, and identify underlying reasons for, and factors associated with, these preferences. Method: Using a scoping review methodology, quantitative and qualitative evidence was systematically considered. To identify studies, PubMed, Maternity and Infant Care, MEDLINE, and Web of Science were searched for the period from 2008 to 2018, and reference lists of included studies were examined. Findings: A total of 65 studies were included. While the majority of women prefer a vaginal birth, between 5-20% in high-income countries and 1.4 to 50% in low-middle-income countries prefer a caesarean section. The six main reasons or factors associated with a mode of birth preference were: (1) perceptions of safety; (2) fear of pain; (3) previous birth experience; (4) encouragement and dissuasion from health professionals; (5) social and cultural influences; and (6) access to information and educational levels. Conclusion: To help ensure women receive the required care that is aligned with their preferences, processes of shared decision-making should be implemented. Shared decision-making has the potential to reduce the rate of unnecessary interventions, and also improve the willingness of women to accept a medically-indicated caesarean section in low-income countries. (C) 2019 Australian College of Midwives. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:323 / 333
页数:11
相关论文
共 129 条
  • [1] Iranian mothers selection of a birth method in the context of perceived norms: A content analysis study
    Abbaspoor, Zahra
    Moghaddam-Banaem, Lida
    Ahmadi, Fazlollah
    Kazemnejad, Anooshirvan
    [J]. MIDWIFERY, 2014, 30 (07) : 804 - 809
  • [2] ACSQHC, 2018, 3 AUSTR ATL HLTH CAR
  • [3] AIHW, 2018, NAT COR MAT IND AUST
  • [4] Akarsu RH, 2014, PAK J MED SCI, V30, P1308, DOI 10.12669/pjms.306.5748
  • [5] Cesarean section on maternal request: the viewpoint of expectant women
    Akintayo, Akinyemi Akinsoji
    Ade-Ojo, Idowu Pius
    Olagbuji, Biodun Nelson
    Akin-Akintayo, Oladunni Olufunmilola
    Ogundare, Omobolanle Ronke
    Olofinbiyi, Babatunde A.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2014, 289 (04) : 781 - 785
  • [6] [Anonymous], 1985, LANCET, V2, P436
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2018, AUSTR MOTH BAB 2016
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2011, PROPOSAL MIXED METHO
  • [9] Knowledge and attitudes about vaginal birth after Caesarean section in Australian hospitals
    Appleton, B
    Targett, C
    Rasmussen, M
    Readman, E
    Sale, F
    Permezel, M
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2000, 40 (02) : 195 - 199
  • [10] Arksey H., 2005, Int J Soc Res Methodol [Internet], V8, P19, DOI [DOI 10.1080/1364557032000119616, 10.1080/1364557032000119616]