Lordosis Recreation in Transforaminal and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion A Cadaveric Study of the Influence of Surgical Bone Resection and Cage Angle

被引:31
作者
Robertson, Peter A. [1 ]
Armstrong, William A. [2 ]
Woods, Daniel L. [2 ]
Rawlinson, Jeremy J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Mercy Specialist Ctr, Orthopaed Clin, 100 Mt Rd,Epsom 1023, Auckland, New Zealand
[2] Medtron Spine, Memphis, TN USA
关键词
cadaveric testing; hyperlordotic cages; interbody cages; lordosis; lordotic cages; lumbar spine surgery; posterior lumbar interbody fusion; radiographic analysis; transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; ADJACENT SEGMENT DEGENERATION; SAGITTAL ALIGNMENT; SPINE; ANTERIOR; CLASSIFICATION; RESTORATION; PELVIS; SIZE;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0000000000002705
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Controlled cadaveric study of surgical technique in transforaminal and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF and PLIF) Objective. To evaluate the contribution of surgical techniques and cage variables in lordosis recreation in posterior interbody fusion (TLIF/PLIF). Summary of Background Data. The major contributors to lumbar lordosis are the lordotic lower lumbar discs. The pathologies requiring treatment with segmental fusion are frequently hypolordotic or kyphotic. Current posterior based interbody techniques have a poor track record for recreating lordosis, although recreation of lordosis with optimum anatomical alignment is associated with better outcomes and reduced adjacent segment change needing revision. It is unclear whether surgical techniques or cage parameters contribute significantly to lordosis recreation. Methods. Eight instrumented cadaveric motion segments were evaluated with pre and post experimental radiological assessment of lordosis. Each motion segment was instrumented with pedicle screw fixation to allow segmental stabilization. The surgical procedures were unilateral TLIF with an 188 lordotic and 27mm length cage, unilateral TLIF (188, 27 mm) with bilateral facetectomy, unilateral TLIF (188, 27 mm) with posterior column osteotomy (PCO), PLIF with bilateral cages (188, 22 mm), and PLIF with bilateral cages (248, 22 mm). Cage insertion used and "insert and rotate'' technique. Results. Pooled results demonstrated a mean increase in lordosis of 2.2 degrees with each procedural step (lordosis increase was serially 1.8 degrees, 3.5 degrees, 1.6 degrees, 2.5 degrees, and 1.6 degrees through the procedures). TLIF and PLIF with PCO increased lordosis significantly compared with unilateral TLIF and TLIF with bilateral facetectomy. The major contributors to lordosis recreation were PCO, and PLIF with paired shorter cages rather than TLIF. Conclusion. This study demonstrates that the surgical approach to posterior interbody surgery influences lordosis gain and PCO optimizes lordosis gain in TLIF. The bilateral cages used in PLIF are shorter and associated with further gain in lordosis. This information has the potential to aid surgical planning when attempting to recreate lordosis to optimize outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:E1350 / E1357
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Influence of pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch on surgical outcomes of short-segment transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Yasuchika Aoki
    Arata Nakajima
    Hiroshi Takahashi
    Masato Sonobe
    Fumiaki Terajima
    Masahiko Saito
    Kazuhisa Takahashi
    Seiji Ohtori
    Atsuya Watanabe
    Takayuki Nakajima
    Makoto Takazawa
    Sumihisa Orita
    Yawara Eguchi
    Koichi Nakagawa
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 16
  • [22] Incidence of Surgical Site Infection Following Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Compared With Posterior/Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion A Propensity Score-Weighted Study
    Masuda, Soichiro
    Fukasawa, Toshiki
    Takeuchi, Masato
    Fujibayashi, Shunsuke
    Otsuki, Bungo
    Murata, Koichi
    Shimizu, Takayoshi
    Matsuda, Shuichi
    Kawakami, Koji
    SPINE, 2023, 48 (13) : 901 - 907
  • [23] Anterior lumbar interbody fusion in comparison with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: implications for the restoration of foraminal height, local disc angle, lumbar lordosis, and sagittal balance
    Hsieh, Patrick C.
    Koski, Tyler R.
    O'Shaughnessy, Brian A.
    Sugrue, Patrick
    Salehi, Sean
    Ondra, Stephen
    Liu, John C.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2007, 7 (04) : 379 - 386
  • [24] Comparison of rigid and semi-rigid instrumentation under acute load on vertebrae treated with posterior lumbar interbody fusion/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion procedures: An experimental study
    Onen, Mehmet Resid
    Basgul, Cemile
    Yilmaz, Ilhan
    Ozkaya, Mustafa
    Demir, Teyfik
    Naderi, Sait
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART H-JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE, 2018, 232 (04) : 388 - 394
  • [25] A comparative study between local bone graft with a cage and with no cage in single posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF): a multicenter study
    Liu, Zhili
    Liu, Jiaming
    Tan, Yongming
    He, Laichang
    Long, Xinhua
    Yang, Dong
    Huang, Shanhu
    Shu, Yong
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2014, 134 (08) : 1051 - 1057
  • [26] Comparing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and posterior lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis A STROBE- compliant observational study
    Zhang, Dapeng
    Mao, Keya
    Qiang, Xiaojun
    MEDICINE, 2017, 96 (37)
  • [27] Revision of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a biomechanical study in nonosteoporotic bone Laboratory investigation
    Ploumis, Avraam
    Wu, Chunhui
    Mehbod, Amir
    Fischer, Gustav
    Faundez, Antonio
    Wu, Wentien
    Transfeldt, Ensor
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2010, 12 (01) : 82 - 87
  • [28] Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion With a Single Oblique PEEK Cage and Posterior Supplemental Fixation
    Dowling, Alvaro
    Lewandrowski, Kai-Uwe
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2020, 14 : S45 - S55
  • [29] What Affects Segmental Lordosis of the Surgical Site after Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion?
    Kim, Soo-Heon
    Hahn, Bang Sang
    Park, Jeong-Yoon
    YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 63 (07) : 665 - 674
  • [30] Augmenting posterolateral fusion with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cage improves clinical outcome, but not fusion rate, of posterior decompression
    Atici, Teoman
    Yerebakan, Selcan
    Ermutlu, Cenk
    Ozyalcin, Ali
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2020, 48 (04)