Lordosis Recreation in Transforaminal and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion A Cadaveric Study of the Influence of Surgical Bone Resection and Cage Angle

被引:31
作者
Robertson, Peter A. [1 ]
Armstrong, William A. [2 ]
Woods, Daniel L. [2 ]
Rawlinson, Jeremy J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Mercy Specialist Ctr, Orthopaed Clin, 100 Mt Rd,Epsom 1023, Auckland, New Zealand
[2] Medtron Spine, Memphis, TN USA
关键词
cadaveric testing; hyperlordotic cages; interbody cages; lordosis; lordotic cages; lumbar spine surgery; posterior lumbar interbody fusion; radiographic analysis; transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; ADJACENT SEGMENT DEGENERATION; SAGITTAL ALIGNMENT; SPINE; ANTERIOR; CLASSIFICATION; RESTORATION; PELVIS; SIZE;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0000000000002705
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Controlled cadaveric study of surgical technique in transforaminal and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF and PLIF) Objective. To evaluate the contribution of surgical techniques and cage variables in lordosis recreation in posterior interbody fusion (TLIF/PLIF). Summary of Background Data. The major contributors to lumbar lordosis are the lordotic lower lumbar discs. The pathologies requiring treatment with segmental fusion are frequently hypolordotic or kyphotic. Current posterior based interbody techniques have a poor track record for recreating lordosis, although recreation of lordosis with optimum anatomical alignment is associated with better outcomes and reduced adjacent segment change needing revision. It is unclear whether surgical techniques or cage parameters contribute significantly to lordosis recreation. Methods. Eight instrumented cadaveric motion segments were evaluated with pre and post experimental radiological assessment of lordosis. Each motion segment was instrumented with pedicle screw fixation to allow segmental stabilization. The surgical procedures were unilateral TLIF with an 188 lordotic and 27mm length cage, unilateral TLIF (188, 27 mm) with bilateral facetectomy, unilateral TLIF (188, 27 mm) with posterior column osteotomy (PCO), PLIF with bilateral cages (188, 22 mm), and PLIF with bilateral cages (248, 22 mm). Cage insertion used and "insert and rotate'' technique. Results. Pooled results demonstrated a mean increase in lordosis of 2.2 degrees with each procedural step (lordosis increase was serially 1.8 degrees, 3.5 degrees, 1.6 degrees, 2.5 degrees, and 1.6 degrees through the procedures). TLIF and PLIF with PCO increased lordosis significantly compared with unilateral TLIF and TLIF with bilateral facetectomy. The major contributors to lordosis recreation were PCO, and PLIF with paired shorter cages rather than TLIF. Conclusion. This study demonstrates that the surgical approach to posterior interbody surgery influences lordosis gain and PCO optimizes lordosis gain in TLIF. The bilateral cages used in PLIF are shorter and associated with further gain in lordosis. This information has the potential to aid surgical planning when attempting to recreate lordosis to optimize outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:E1350 / E1357
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effect of steerable cage placement during minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion on lumbar lordosis
    Lindley, Timothy E.
    Viljoen, Stephanus V.
    Dandaleh, Nader S.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 21 (03) : 441 - 444
  • [2] Biomechanical Evaluation of a Novel Autogenous Bone Interbody Fusion Cage for Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in a Cadaveric Model
    Wang, Le
    Malone, Kyle T.
    Huang, Hai
    Zhang, Zhenshan
    Zhang, Zhi
    Zhang, Liang
    Li, Jian
    SPINE, 2014, 39 (11) : E684 - E692
  • [3] Does Interbody Cage Lordosis and Position Affect Radiographic Outcomes After Single-level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion?
    DiMaria, Stephen
    Karamian, Brian A.
    Siegel, Nicholas
    Lambrechts, Mark J.
    Grewal, Lovy
    Jeyamohan, Hareindra R.
    Robinson, William A.
    Patel, Akul
    Canseco, Jose A.
    Kaye, Ian David
    Woods, Barrett, I
    Radcliff, Kris E.
    Kurd, Mark F.
    Hilibrand, Alan S.
    Kepler, Chris K.
    Vaccaro, Alex R.
    Schroeder, Gregory D.
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2022, 35 (09): : E674 - E679
  • [4] Risk factors for cage subsidence and clinical outcomes after transforaminal and posterior lumbar interbody fusion
    Amorim-Barbosa, Tiago
    Pereira, Catarina
    Catelas, Diogo
    Rodrigues, Claudia
    Costa, Paulo
    Rodrigues-Pinto, Ricardo
    Neves, Pedro
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2022, 32 (07) : 1291 - 1299
  • [5] Can Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Create Lordosis from a Posterior Approach?
    Anand, Neel
    Kong, Christopher
    NEUROSURGERY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2018, 29 (03) : 453 - +
  • [6] Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with a tantalum cage: lumbar lordosis redistribution and sacral slope restoration with a modified posterior technique
    Ferraro, Marcello
    Puglia, Francesco
    Della Valle, Andrea
    Cerbone, Vincenzo
    Cicatelli, Alfonso
    Peroni, Donata Rita
    Cecconi, Davide
    Misaggi, Bernardo
    La Maida, Giovanni Andrea
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2023, 24 (01)
  • [7] Definition of cage subsidence in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) approach and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) approach - A systematic review
    Baig, Rehman Ali
    Quiceno, Esteban
    Soliman, Mohamed A. R.
    Aguirre, Alexander O.
    Okai, Bernard K.
    Kuo, Cathleen C.
    Francois, Hendrick B.
    Stockman, Isabelle
    Shah, Shashwat
    Levy, Hannon W.
    Khan, Asham
    Rho, Kyungduk
    Pollina, John
    Mullin, Jeffrey P.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2025, 133
  • [8] How Does Cage Lordosis Influence Postoperative Segmental Lordosis in Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Gambhir, Shanu
    Wang, Tian
    Pelletier, Matthew H.
    Walsh, William R.
    Ball, Jonathon R.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 126 : E606 - E611
  • [9] Does Lordotic Angle of Cage Determine Lumbar Lordosis in Lumbar Interbody Fusion?
    Hong, Taek-Ho
    Cho, Kyu-Jung
    Kim, Young-Tae
    Park, Jae-Woo
    Seo, Beom-Ho
    Kim, Nak-Chul
    SPINE, 2017, 42 (13) : E775 - E780
  • [10] Comparison of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using the Boomerang-Shaped Cage with Traditional Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
    Ishihara, Yohei
    Morishita, Masutaro
    Miyaki, Jiro
    Kanzaki, Koji
    Toyone, Tomoaki
    SPINE SURGERY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2019, 3 (01): : 71 - 78