Co-firing of coal and manure biomass: A TG-MS approach

被引:66
作者
Otero, M. [1 ]
Sanchez, M. E. [2 ]
Gomez, X. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Aveiro, Ctr Estudos Ambiente & Mar, CESAM, P-3810193 Aveiro, Portugal
[2] Univ Leon, Dept Chem Engn, Inst Nat Resources, E-24071 Leon, Spain
关键词
Combustion; Kinetics; Biowaste; Waste management; Waste valorisation; THERMOGRAVIMETRIC KINETIC-ANALYSIS; ACTIVATION-ENERGY; SEWAGE-SLUDGE; COMBUSTION; PYROLYSIS; COCOMBUSTION; PERFORMANCE; SOLIDS; CHARS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.biortech.2011.06.040
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
Manure is a rich organic waste which, apart from its traditional use as a fertilizer, could be used as a bioenergy feedstock. In this sense, its utilization as a sole fuel or its co-combustion together with coal would be a choice for the management of this sort of biowaste. However, little is known about the behavior of this biowaste when submitted to high-temperature energy-conversion processes. Thus, the separate combustion of swine manure and coal and their co-combustion (10% dried weight of manure) were studied by simultaneous TG/MS dynamic runs. TG-MS analysis was successfully used as an easy rapid tool to assess the combustion of manure, alone or together with coal. Furthermore, non-isothermal kinetic analysis showed that the Arrhenius activation energy corresponding to the combustion of the blend (125.8-138.9 kJ/mol) was only slightly higher than that of manure (106.4-114.4 kJ/mol) or coal (107.0-119.6 kJ/mol). (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:8304 / 8309
页数:6
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Co-firing of coal and cattle feedlot biomass (FB) fuels.: Part II.: Performance results from 30 kWt (100,000) BTU/h laboratory scale boiler burner [J].
Annamalai, K ;
Thien, B ;
Sweeten, J .
FUEL, 2003, 82 (10) :1183-1193
[2]   Simultaneous thermogravimetric - mass spectrometric study on the pyrolysis behaviour of different rank coals [J].
Arenillas, A ;
Rubiera, F ;
Pis, JJ .
JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL AND APPLIED PYROLYSIS, 1999, 50 (01) :31-46
[3]   Feedlot biomass co-firing: A renewable energy alternative for coal-fired utilities [J].
Arumugam, S ;
Thien, B ;
Annamalai, K ;
Sweeten, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREEN ENERGY, 2005, 2 (04) :409-419
[4]  
*ASTM INT, 2005, D0388 ASTM INT, DOI DOI 10.1520/D0388-05
[5]   A COMPARISON OF NO RELEASE FROM COALS AND ENTRAINED-FLOW REACTOR CHARS DURING TEMPERATURE-PROGRAMMED COMBUSTION [J].
BROWN, SD ;
THOMAS, KM .
FUEL, 1993, 72 (03) :359-365
[6]   TG-MS as a technique for a better monitoring of the pyrolysis, gasification and combustion of two kinds of sewage sludge [J].
Calvo, LF ;
Sánchez, ME ;
Morán, A ;
García, AI .
JOURNAL OF THERMAL ANALYSIS AND CALORIMETRY, 2004, 78 (02) :587-598
[7]   Livestock waste-to-bioenergy generation opportunities [J].
Cantrell, Keri B. ;
Ducey, Thomas ;
Ro, Kyoung S. ;
Hunt, Patrick G. .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 99 (17) :7941-7953
[8]   The economics of reburning with cattle manure-based biomass in existing coal-fired power plants for NOx and CO2 emissions control [J].
Carlin, Nicholas T. ;
Annamalai, Kalyan ;
Harman, Wyatte L. ;
Sweeten, John M. .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2009, 33 (09) :1139-1157
[9]  
Doyle CD., 1962, J Appl Polym Sci, V6, P639, DOI DOI 10.1002/APP.1962.070062406
[10]   High-temperature thermal destruction of poultry derived wastes for energy recovery in Australia [J].
Florin, N. H. ;
Maddocks, A. R. ;
Wood, S. ;
Harris, A. T. .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2009, 29 (04) :1399-1408