Generative probabilistic models for protein-protein interaction networks-the biclique perspective

被引:24
作者
Schweiger, Regev [1 ]
Linial, Michal [2 ,3 ]
Linial, Nathan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Sch Engn & Comp Sci, IL-91904 Jerusalem, Israel
[2] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Dept Biol Chem, Alexander Silberman Inst Life Sci, IL-91904 Jerusalem, Israel
[3] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Sudarsky Ctr Computat Biol, IL-91904 Jerusalem, Israel
基金
以色列科学基金会;
关键词
SCALE-FREE; INTERACTION MAP; YEAST; EMERGENCE; PAIRS;
D O I
10.1093/bioinformatics/btr201
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Motivation: Much of the large-scale molecular data from living cells can be represented in terms of networks. Such networks occupy a central position in cellular systems biology. In the protein-protein interaction (PPI) network, nodes represent proteins and edges represent connections between them, based on experimental evidence. As PPI networks are rich and complex, a mathematical model is sought to capture their properties and shed light on PPI evolution. The mathematical literature contains various generative models of random graphs. It is a major, still largely open question, which of these models (if any) can properly reproduce various biologically interesting networks. Here, we consider this problem where the graph at hand is the PPI network of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We are trying to distinguishing between a model family which performs a process of copying neighbors, represented by the duplication-divergence (DD) model, and models which do not copy neighbors, with the Barabasi-Albert (BA) preferential attachment model as a leading example. Results: The observed property of the network is the distribution of maximal bicliques in the graph. This is a novel criterion to distinguish between models in this area. It is particularly appropriate for this purpose, since it reflects the graph's growth pattern under either model. This test clearly favors the DD model. In particular, for the BA model, the vast majority (92.9%) of the bicliques with both sides >= 4 must be already embedded in the model's seed graph, whereas the corresponding figure for the DD model is only 5.1%. Our results, based on the biclique perspective, conclusively show that a naive unmodified DD model can capture a key aspect of PPI networks.
引用
收藏
页码:I142 / I148
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Choosing appropriate models for protein-protein interaction networks: a comparison study [J].
Shao, Mingyu ;
Yang, Yi ;
Guan, Jihong ;
Zhou, Shuigeng .
BRIEFINGS IN BIOINFORMATICS, 2014, 15 (05) :823-838
[2]   Revisiting topological properties and models of protein-protein interaction networks from the perspective of dataset evolution [J].
Shao, Mingyu ;
Zhou, Shuigeng ;
Guan, Jihong .
IET SYSTEMS BIOLOGY, 2015, 9 (04) :113-119
[3]   Protein-protein interaction networks: the puzzling riches [J].
Wodak, Shoshana J. ;
Vlasblom, James ;
Turinsky, Andrei L. ;
Pu, Shuye .
CURRENT OPINION IN STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 2013, 23 (06) :941-953
[4]   Revisiting Topological Properties of Protein-Protein Interaction Networks from the Perspective of Dataset Evolution [J].
Shao, Mingyu ;
Zhou, Shuigeng ;
Guan, Jihong .
2014 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOINFORMATICS AND BIOMEDICINE (BIBM), 2014,
[5]   The Intrinsic Geometric Structure of Protein-Protein Interaction Networks for Protein Interaction Prediction [J].
Fang, Yi ;
Sun, Mengtian ;
Dai, Guoxian ;
Ramani, Karthik .
INTELLIGENT COMPUTING IN BIOINFORMATICS, 2014, 8590 :487-493
[6]   The Intrinsic Geometric Structure of Protein-Protein Interaction Networks for Protein Interaction Prediction [J].
Fang, Yi ;
Sun, Mengtian ;
Dai, Guoxian ;
Ramain, Karthik .
IEEE-ACM TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2016, 13 (01) :76-85
[7]   On the structure of protein-protein interaction networks [J].
Thomas, A ;
Cannings, R ;
Monk, NAM ;
Cannings, C .
BIOCHEMICAL SOCIETY TRANSACTIONS, 2003, 31 :1491-1496
[8]   Analyzing Protein-Protein Interaction Networks [J].
Koh, Gavin C. K. W. ;
Porras, Pablo ;
Aranda, Bruno ;
Hermjakob, Henning ;
Orchard, Sandra E. .
JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH, 2012, 11 (04) :2014-2031
[9]   Clustering and Summarizing Protein-Protein Interaction Networks: A Survey [J].
Bhowmick, Sourav S. ;
Seah, Boon Siew .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON KNOWLEDGE AND DATA ENGINEERING, 2016, 28 (03) :638-658
[10]   Building Protein-Protein Interaction Networks with Proteomics and Informatics Tools [J].
Sardiu, Mihaela E. ;
Washburn, Michael P. .
JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 2011, 286 (27) :23645-23651