The troubles with peer review for allocating research funding Funders need to experiment with versions of peer review and decision-making

被引：23
作者：
Bendiscioli, Sandra [1 ]
机构：
[1] EMBO, Sci Policy, Heidelberg, Germany
来源：
EMBO REPORTS | 2019年 / 20卷 / 12期
关键词：
D O I：
10.15252/embr.201949472
中图分类号：
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号：
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要：
Peer review to allocate funding for researchers and projects has faced difficulties lately and come under criticism. Various alternatives and improvements are being tested to address these problems.[graphic not available: see fulltext]
引用
收藏
页数：5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Research Review: Family group decision-making: a promising practice in need of more programme theory and research
    Crampton, David
    CHILD & FAMILY SOCIAL WORK, 2007, 12 (02) : 202 - 209
  • [32] Peer researchers’ experiences of a co-produced research project on supported decision-making
    Webb P.
    Falls D.
    Keenan F.
    Norris B.
    Owens A.
    Davidson G.
    Edge R.
    Kelly B.
    McLaughlin A.
    Montgomery L.
    Mulvenna C.
    Irvine R.S.
    Research Involvement and Engagement, 8 (1)
  • [33] Mandated Research Peer Review Positively Impacts Research Funding Success Rates for Young Investigators
    Opipari, Valerie P.
    Lumeng, Julie C.
    Youmans, Becky
    Silverstein, Faye
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2019, 210 : 3 - 4
  • [34] Review of Research on Decision-making and Planning for Automated Vehicles
    Zhu B.
    Jia S.-Z.
    Zhao J.
    Han J.-Y.
    Zhang P.-X.
    Song D.-J.
    Zhongguo Gonglu Xuebao/China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2024, 37 (01): : 215 - 240
  • [35] Scientific peer review to inform regulatory decision making: Leadership responsibilities and cautions
    Patton, DE
    Olin, SS
    RISK ANALYSIS, 2006, 26 (01) : 5 - 16
  • [36] The manuscript reviewing process: Empirical research on review requests, review sequences, and decision rules in peer review
    Bornmann, Lutz
    Daniel, Hans-Dieter
    LIBRARY & INFORMATION SCIENCE RESEARCH, 2010, 32 (01) : 5 - 12
  • [37] Peer review and over-competitive research funding fostering mainstream opinion to monopoly
    Hui Fang
    Scientometrics, 2011, 87 : 293 - 301
  • [38] The leaky pipeline in research grant peer review and funding decisions: challenges and future directions
    Sato, Sayaka
    Gygax, Pascal Mark
    Randall, Julian
    Schmid Mast, Marianne
    HIGHER EDUCATION, 2021, 82 (01) : 145 - 162
  • [39] The leaky pipeline in research grant peer review and funding decisions: challenges and future directions
    Sayaka Sato
    Pascal Mark Gygax
    Julian Randall
    Marianne Schmid Mast
    Higher Education, 2021, 82 : 145 - 162
  • [40] Peer review of funding applications for health research in ethnic minority groups must improve
    Kudrna, Laura
    Lilford, Richard
    Adebajo, Ade
    Kumar, Kanta
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2024, 384
12345