The physical basis and future of radiation therapy

被引:59
作者
Bortfeld, T. [1 ,2 ]
Jeraj, R. [3 ]
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
[3] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Med Phys, Madison, WI 53706 USA
关键词
POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; TARGET VOLUME DELINEATION; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; MULTICRITERIA OPTIMIZATION; LUNG-CANCER; ADAPTIVE RADIOTHERAPY; DOSE DISTRIBUTIONS; NORMAL TISSUE; NECK-CANCER; PROTON-BEAM;
D O I
10.1259/bjr/86221320
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The remarkable progress in radiation therapy over the last century has been largely due to our ability to more effectively focus and deliver radiation to the tumour target volume. Physics discoveries and technology inventions have been an important driving force behind this progress. However, there is still plenty of room left for future improvements through physics, for example image guidance and four-dimensional motion management and particle therapy, as well as increased efficiency of more compact and cheaper technologies. Bigger challenges lie ahead of physicists in radiation therapy beyond the dose localisation problem, for example in the areas of biological target definition, improved modelling for normal tissues and tumours, advanced multicriteria and robust optimisation, and continuous incorporation of advanced technologies such as molecular imaging. The success of physics in radiation therapy has been based on the continued "fuelling" of the field with new discoveries and inventions from physics research. A key to the success has been the application of the rigorous scientific method. In spite of the importance of physics research for radiation therapy, too few physicists are currently involved in cutting-edge research. The increased emphasis on more "professionalism" in medical physics will tip the situation even more off balance. To prevent this from happening, we argue that medical physics needs more research positions, and more and better academic programmes. Only with more emphasis on medical physics research will the future of radiation therapy and other physics-related medical specialties look as bright as the past, and medical physics will maintain a status as one of the most exciting fields of applied physics.
引用
收藏
页码:485 / 498
页数:14
相关论文
共 71 条
  • [11] Threshold segmentation for PET target volume delineation in radiation treatment planning: The role of target-to-background ratio and target size
    Brambilla, M.
    Matheoud, R.
    Secco, C.
    Loi, G.
    Krengli, M.
    Inglese, E.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (04) : 1207 - 1213
  • [12] Correlation of positron emission tomography standard uptake value and pathologic specimen size in cancer of the head and neck
    Burri, Ryan J.
    Rangaswamy, Balasubramanya
    Kostakoglu, Lale
    Hoch, Benjamin
    Genden, Eric M.
    Som, Peter M.
    Kao, Johnny
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2008, 71 (03): : 682 - 688
  • [13] Adaptive Radiotherapy of Head and Neck Cancer
    Castadot, Pierre
    Lee, John A.
    Geets, Xavier
    Gregoire, Vincent
    [J]. SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2010, 20 (02) : 84 - 93
  • [14] Repeat FDG-PET after neoadjuvant therapy is a predictor of pathologic response in patients with non-small cell lung cancer
    Cerfolio, RJ
    Bryant, AS
    Winokur, TS
    Ohja, B
    Bartolucci, AA
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2004, 78 (06) : 1903 - 1909
  • [15] A robust approach to IMRT optimization
    Chan, TCY
    Bortfeld, T
    Tsitsiklis, JN
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2006, 51 (10) : 2567 - 2583
  • [16] The limitation of PET imaging for biological adaptive-IMRT assessed in animal models
    Christian, Nicolas
    Lee, John A.
    Bol, Anne
    De Bast, Marc
    Jordan, B.
    Gregoire, Vincent
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2009, 91 (01) : 101 - 106
  • [17] Robust optimization for intensity modulated radiation therapy treatment planning under uncertainty
    Chu, M
    Zinchenko, Y
    Henderson, SG
    Sharpe, MB
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2005, 50 (23) : 5463 - 5477
  • [18] CORMACK AM, 1979, EARLY 2 DIMENSIONAL
  • [19] Tumor volume in pharyngolaryngeal squamous cell carcinoma:: Comparison at CT, MR imaging, and FDG PET and validation with surgical specimen
    Daisne, JF
    Duprez, T
    Weynand, B
    Lonneux, M
    Hamoir, M
    Reychler, H
    Grégoire, V
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2004, 233 (01) : 93 - 100
  • [20] TOLERANCE OF NORMAL TISSUE TO THERAPEUTIC IRRADIATION
    EMAMI, B
    LYMAN, J
    BROWN, A
    COIA, L
    GOITEIN, M
    MUNZENRIDER, JE
    SHANK, B
    SOLIN, LJ
    WESSON, M
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1991, 21 (01): : 109 - 122