Efficacy and radiographic analysis of oblique lumbar interbody fusion in treating adult spinal deformity

被引:9
|
作者
Jo, Dae-Jean [1 ]
Seo, Eun-Min [2 ]
机构
[1] Kyung Hee Univ, Hosp Gangdong, Spine Ctr, Dept Neurosurg, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Hallym Univ, Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Orthoped Surg, Chunchon, South Korea
来源
PLOS ONE | 2021年 / 16卷 / 09期
关键词
DEGENERATIVE SCOLIOSIS; SURGICAL-TREATMENT; LATERAL APPROACH; OUTCOMES; PARAMETERS; COMPLICATIONS; DIFFERENCE; STRATEGIES;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0257316
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Adult spinal deformity (ASD) is usually rigid and requires a combined anterior-posterior approach for deformity correction. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) allows direct access to the disc space and placement of a large interbody graft. A larger interbody graft facilitates correction of ASD. However, an anterior approach carries significant risks. Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) through a minimally invasive approach has recently been used for ASD. The present study was performed to evaluate the effectiveness of oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) in the treatment of ASD. We performed a retrospective study utilizing the data of 74 patients with ASD. The inclusion criteria were lumbar coronal Cobb angle > 20 degrees, pelvic incidence (PI)-lumbar lordosis (LL) mismatch > 10 degrees, and minimum follow-up of 2 years. Patients were divided into two groups: ALIF combined with posterior spinal fixation (ALIF+PSF) (n = 38) and OLIF combined with posterior spinal fixation (OLIF+PSF) (n = 36). The perioperative spinal deformity radiographic parameters, complications, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes were assessed and compared between the two groups. The preoperative sagittal vertical axis (SVA), LL, PI-LL mismatch, and lumbar Cobb angles were similar between the two groups. Patients in the OLIF+PSF group had a slightly higher mean number of interbody fusion levels than those in the ALIF+PSF group. At the final follow-up, all radiographic parameters and HRQoL scores were similar between the two groups. However, the rates of perioperative complications were higher in the ALIF+PSF than OLIF+PSF group. The ALIF+PSF and OLIF+PSF groups showed similar radiographic and HRQoL outcomes. These observations suggest that OLIF is a safe and reliable surgical treatment option for ASD.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Risk factors for coronal oblique take-off following adult spinal deformity surgery using lateral lumbar interbody fusion and open posterior corrective fusion
    Keiichi Nakai
    Yu Yamato
    Tomohiko Hasegawa
    Go Yoshida
    Tomohiro Banno
    Hideyuki Arima
    Shin Oe
    Yuki Mihara
    Tomohiro Yamada
    Koichiro Ide
    Yuh Watanabe
    Kenta Kurosu
    Yukihiro Matsuyama
    Spine Deformity, 2022, 10 : 647 - 656
  • [32] Mini-Open Anterior Retroperitoneal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Spinal Degeneration Disease
    Ohtori, Seiji
    Orita, Sumihisa
    Yamauchi, Kazuyo
    Eguchi, Yawara
    Ochiai, Nobuyasu
    Kishida, Shunji
    Kuniyoshi, Kazuki
    Aoki, Yasuchika
    Nakamura, Junichi
    Ishikawa, Tetsuhiro
    Miyagi, Masayuki
    Kamoda, Hiroto
    Suzuki, Miyako
    Kubota, Gou
    Sakuma, Yoshihiro
    Oikawa, Yasuhiro
    Inage, Kazuhide
    Sainoh, Takeshi
    Sato, Jun
    Fujimoto, Kazuki
    Shiga, Yasuhiro
    Abe, Koki
    Toyone, Tomoaki
    Inoue, Gen
    Takahashi, Kazuhisa
    YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 56 (04) : 1051 - 1059
  • [33] Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) versus Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF) in Interbody Fusion Technique for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Chang, Min Cheol
    Kim, Gang-Un
    Choo, Yoo Jin
    Lee, Gun Woo
    LIFE-BASEL, 2021, 11 (07):
  • [34] Treatment of Adult Spinal Deformity with Sagittal Imbalance Using Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Can We Predict How Much Lordosis Correction Is Possible?
    Kim, Whoan Jeang
    Lee, Jae Won
    Park, Kun Young
    Chang, Shann Haw
    Song, Dae Geon
    Choy, Won Sik
    ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2019, 13 (06) : 1017 - 1027
  • [35] Comparison between oblique lumbar interbody fusion and posterior lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    An, Bochen
    Ren, Bowen
    Han, Zhenchuan
    Mao, Keya
    Liu, Jianheng
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2023, 18 (01)
  • [36] Efficacy of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion in Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Disease
    Zhang, Can
    Wang, Kai
    Jian, Fengzeng
    Wu, Hao
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 124 : E17 - E24
  • [37] Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol for Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Shao, Xiaofeng
    Li, Renjie
    Zhang, Lichen
    Jiang, Weimin
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2022, 56 (06) : 1073 - 1082
  • [38] Minimally Invasive Surgery Oblique Lumbar Interbody Debridement and Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Spondylodiscitis
    Wang, Bingjin
    Chen, Chao
    Hua, Wenbin
    Ke, Wencan
    Lu, Saideng
    Zhang, Yukun
    Zeng, Xianlin
    Yang, Cao
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2020, 12 (04) : 1120 - 1130
  • [39] Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Multilevel Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Adult Degenerative Scoliosis
    Katz, Austen D.
    Singh, Hardeep
    Greenwood, Matthew
    Cote, Mark
    Moss, Isaac L.
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2019, 32 (08): : E386 - E396
  • [40] The role of minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion in sagittal balance correction and spinal deformity
    Costanzo, Giuseppe
    Zoccali, Carmine
    Maykowski, Philip
    Walter, Christina M.
    Skoch, Jesse
    Baaj, Ali A.
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2014, 23 (06) : S699 - S704