Efficacy and radiographic analysis of oblique lumbar interbody fusion in treating adult spinal deformity

被引:9
|
作者
Jo, Dae-Jean [1 ]
Seo, Eun-Min [2 ]
机构
[1] Kyung Hee Univ, Hosp Gangdong, Spine Ctr, Dept Neurosurg, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Hallym Univ, Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Orthoped Surg, Chunchon, South Korea
来源
PLOS ONE | 2021年 / 16卷 / 09期
关键词
DEGENERATIVE SCOLIOSIS; SURGICAL-TREATMENT; LATERAL APPROACH; OUTCOMES; PARAMETERS; COMPLICATIONS; DIFFERENCE; STRATEGIES;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0257316
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Adult spinal deformity (ASD) is usually rigid and requires a combined anterior-posterior approach for deformity correction. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) allows direct access to the disc space and placement of a large interbody graft. A larger interbody graft facilitates correction of ASD. However, an anterior approach carries significant risks. Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) through a minimally invasive approach has recently been used for ASD. The present study was performed to evaluate the effectiveness of oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) in the treatment of ASD. We performed a retrospective study utilizing the data of 74 patients with ASD. The inclusion criteria were lumbar coronal Cobb angle > 20 degrees, pelvic incidence (PI)-lumbar lordosis (LL) mismatch > 10 degrees, and minimum follow-up of 2 years. Patients were divided into two groups: ALIF combined with posterior spinal fixation (ALIF+PSF) (n = 38) and OLIF combined with posterior spinal fixation (OLIF+PSF) (n = 36). The perioperative spinal deformity radiographic parameters, complications, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes were assessed and compared between the two groups. The preoperative sagittal vertical axis (SVA), LL, PI-LL mismatch, and lumbar Cobb angles were similar between the two groups. Patients in the OLIF+PSF group had a slightly higher mean number of interbody fusion levels than those in the ALIF+PSF group. At the final follow-up, all radiographic parameters and HRQoL scores were similar between the two groups. However, the rates of perioperative complications were higher in the ALIF+PSF than OLIF+PSF group. The ALIF+PSF and OLIF+PSF groups showed similar radiographic and HRQoL outcomes. These observations suggest that OLIF is a safe and reliable surgical treatment option for ASD.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Development and Application of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Li, Renjie
    Li, Xuefeng
    Zhou, Hong
    Jiang, Weimin
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2020, 12 (02) : 355 - 365
  • [22] Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion vs. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Gao, Quan-You
    Wei, Fei-Long
    Li, Tian
    Zhu, Kai-Long
    Du, Ming-Rui
    Heng, Wei
    Yang, Fan
    Gao, Hao-Ran
    Qian, Ji-Xian
    Zhou, Cheng-Pei
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2022, 9
  • [23] Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Which One in Which Patient?
    Dada, Abraham
    Liles, Campbell
    Kanter, Adam S.
    Alan, Nima
    NEUROSURGERY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2025, 36 (01) : 1 - 10
  • [24] Efficacy of oblique lumbar interbody fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Xi-yong
    Wang, Yun-lu
    Yang, Su
    Liao, Chang-sheng
    Li, Song-feng
    Han, Peng-yong
    Han, Peng-fei
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2023, 143 (09) : 5657 - 5670
  • [25] Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy Versus Multilevel Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Adult Spinal Deformity Trends, Outcomes, and Cost
    Chi, Jialun
    Zhang, Yi
    Fontaine, Andrew
    Zhang, Zhichang
    Wang, Jesse
    Labaran, Lawal
    Li, Xudong
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2024, 37 (05): : E192 - E200
  • [26] Radiographic Study of Lumbar Sympathetic Trunk in Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Surgery
    Wang, Hongli
    Zhang, Yuxuan
    Ma, Xiaosheng
    Xia, Xinlei
    Lu, Feizhou
    Jiang, Jianyuan
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 116 : E380 - E385
  • [27] Risk Factor Analysis of Proximal Junctional Kyphosis after Surgical Treatment of Adult Spinal Deformity with Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion
    Koike, Yoshinao
    Kotani, Yoshihisa
    Terao, Hidemasa
    Iwasaki, Norimasa
    ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2021, 15 (01) : 107 - 116
  • [28] Lateral interbody fusion combined with open posterior surgery for adult spinal deformity
    Strom, Russell G.
    Bae, Junseok
    Mizutani, Jun
    Valone, Frank, III
    Ames, Christopher P.
    Deviren, Vedat
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2016, 25 (06) : 697 - 705
  • [29] Lumbar Lordosis Correction With Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Adult Spinal Deformity Patients with Minimum 2-Year Follow-up
    Mikula, Anthony L.
    Lakomkin, Nikita
    Pennington, Zach
    Nassr, Ahmad
    Freedman, Brett
    Sebastian, Arjun S.
    Bydon, Mohamad
    Elder, Benjamin D.
    Fogelson, Jeremy L.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 167 : E295 - E302
  • [30] Risk factors for coronal oblique take-off following adult spinal deformity surgery using lateral lumbar interbody fusion and open posterior corrective fusion
    Nakai, Keiichi
    Yamato, Yu
    Hasegawa, Tomohiko
    Yoshida, Go
    Banno, Tomohiro
    Arima, Hideyuki
    Oe, Shin
    Mihara, Yuki
    Yamada, Tomohiro
    Ide, Koichiro
    Watanabe, Yuh
    Kurosu, Kenta
    Matsuyama, Yukihiro
    SPINE DEFORMITY, 2022, 10 (03) : 647 - 656