Identity, reputation and social interaction with an application to sequential voting

被引:3
作者
Barucci, Emilio [2 ]
Tolotti, Marco [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ca Foscari Venezia, Dept Management, I-30121 Venice, Italy
[2] Politecn Milan, Dept Math, I-20133 Milan, Italy
关键词
Identity; Random utility models; Reputation; Social interaction; Voting systems; MAJORITY-RULE; MODEL; INSTITUTIONS; PREFERENCES; ECONOMICS; MOMENTUM; CHOICE;
D O I
10.1007/s11403-011-0083-0
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We analyze binary choices in a random utility model assuming that agent's preferences are affected by conformism (with respect to the behavior of the society) and coherence (with respect to identity). We show that multiple stationary equilibria may arise and that the outcome looks very different from a society where all the agents take their decisions in isolation. We quantify the fraction of agents that behave coherently. We apply the analysis to sequential voting when voters "like to win". Compared to the present literature, we enrich the setting assuming that each voter is endowed with an ideology and we consider the interplay between coherence and the desire to vote with the (perceived) majority.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 98
页数:20
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   A THEORY OF SOCIAL CUSTOM, OF WHICH UNEMPLOYMENT MAY BE ONE CONSEQUENCE [J].
AKERLOF, GA .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1980, 94 (04) :749-775
[2]   Identity and the economics of organizations [J].
Akerlof, GA ;
Kranton, RE .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2005, 19 (01) :9-32
[3]   Economics and identity [J].
Akerlof, GA ;
Kranton, RE .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2000, 115 (03) :715-753
[4]  
Akerlof GA, 2010, IDENTITY ECONOMICS: HOW OUR IDENTITIES SHAPE OUR WORK, WAGES, AND WELL-BEING, P1
[5]   Social distance and social decisions [J].
Akerlof, GA .
ECONOMETRICA, 1997, 65 (05) :1005-1027
[6]   Identity, supervision, and work groups [J].
Akerlof, George A. ;
Kranton, Rachel E. .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2008, 98 (02) :212-217
[7]   The missing motivation in macroeconomics [J].
Akerlof, George A. .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2007, 97 (01) :5-36
[8]  
[Anonymous], J POLITICAL EC
[9]   Information aggregation, rationality, and the condorcet jury theorem [J].
AustenSmith, D ;
Banks, JS .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1996, 90 (01) :34-45
[10]  
Barucci E, 2009, WORKING PAPER SERIES