Mismatch repair deficiency and prognostic significance in patients with low-risk endometrioid endometrial cancers

被引:14
|
作者
Kim, Soyoun Rachel [1 ]
Pina, Annick [2 ]
Albert, Arianne [3 ]
McAlpine, Jessica N. [4 ]
Wolber, Robert [5 ]
Gilks, Blake [5 ]
Carey, Mark S. [4 ]
Kwon, Janice S. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Gynecol Oncol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Montreal, Obstet & Gynaecol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] Womens Hlth Res Inst, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[4] Univ British Columbia, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Gynecol Oncol, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[5] Univ British Columbia, Pathol & Lab Med, Vancouver, BC, Canada
关键词
uterine cancer; endometrium; lynch syndrome II; MICROSATELLITE INSTABILITY; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; EXPRESSION; MLH1;
D O I
10.1136/ijgc-2019-000910
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives Mismatch repair deficiency is observed in 25%-30% of all endometrial cancers. This can be detected by the absence of mismatch repair protein staining on immunohistochemistry, and is used as a screen for Lynch syndrome. Only 10% of women with mismatch repair deficiency have Lynch syndrome, but mismatch repair deficiency may still have prognostic significance. The objective of this study was to compare clinical outcomes between mismatch repair-deficient and mismatch repair-proficient low-risk endometrioid endometrial cancers (stage IA, grade 1 or 2). Methods This was a retrospective population-based cohort study of all low-risk endometrioid endometrial cancers (stage IA, grade 1 or 2) from the Vancouver Coastal Health Authority region from February 2011 to January 2016 that were assessed for mismatch repair deficiency. Any other histology, stage, or grade was excluded from the study. Primary outcome measures were progression-free survival and overall survival calculated using Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests. Cox proportional hazards model estimated the association between mismatch repair deficiency and recurrence and death after adjustment for covariates, expressed as hazard ratios (HRs). Secondary outcome measures were recurrence rates expressed per 100 person-years (p100py). Results There were 475 patients diagnosed with low-risk endometrioid endometrial cancer, including 131 with mismatch repair-deficient (27.6%) and 344 with mismatch repair-proficient (72.4%) tumors. Women with mismatch repair-deficient tumors had worse progression-free survival (24 months; p=0.0082) and higher recurrence rates (3.56 p100py) compared with those with mismatch repair-proficient tumors (27 months; 1.21 p100py, p=0.04). The absolute number of recurrences was overall low. There were 11 recurrences out of 131 mismatch repair-deficient cases (8.4%) and 14 out of 344 mismatch repair proficient cases (4.1%). After adjustment for age, lymphovascular space invasion status, adjuvant therapy, and post-operative grade, mismatch repair-deficient status remained associated with a higher risk of recurrence (HR 3.56, 95% CI 2.01 to 5.95). There was no significant difference in overall survival between mismatch repair groups (mismatch repair-proficient group 27.5 months vs 25.0 months in the deficient group) (HR 1.23, 95% CI 0.49 to 3.10). Conclusion In low-risk stage IA grade 1 or 2 endometrioid endometrial cancers, mismatch repair deficiency is associated with a higher recurrence rate than mismatch repair proficiency after adjustment for covariates, implying that mismatch repair deficiency reflects a different biology in endometrial cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:783 / 788
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] MISMATCH REPAIR PROTEIN EXPRESSION DEFECTS IN ENDOMETRIOID ENDOMETRIAL ADENOCARCINOMA
    Brincat, Mark
    Buhagiar, Tiffany
    Falzon, Sharon
    Ariff, Sabrina
    Bugeja, Simona
    Debono, James Mark
    Baron, Yves Muscat
    Calleja, Neville
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2020, 30 : A121 - A122
  • [32] Prognostic significance of peritoneal cytology in low-risk endometrial cancer: comparison of laparoscopic surgery and laparotomy
    Fujiwara, Satoe
    Nishie, Ruri
    Ueda, Shoko
    Miyamoto, Syunsuke
    Terada, Shinichi
    Kogata, Yuhei
    Tanaka, Tomohito
    Tanaka, Yoshimichi
    Ohmichi, Masahide
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 26 (04) : 777 - 783
  • [33] Prognostic significance of peritoneal cytology in low-risk endometrial cancer: comparison of laparoscopic surgery and laparotomy
    Satoe Fujiwara
    Ruri Nishie
    Shoko Ueda
    Syunsuke Miyamoto
    Shinichi Terada
    Yuhei Kogata
    Tomohito Tanaka
    Yoshimichi Tanaka
    Masahide Ohmichi
    International Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2021, 26 : 777 - 783
  • [34] Discordant Status of DNA Mismatch Repair Deficiency between Endometrioid Carcinoma and Adjacent Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia
    Wong, Serena
    Buza, Natalia
    Hui, Pei
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2019, 99
  • [35] Discordant Status of DNA Mismatch Repair Deficiency between Endometrioid Carcinoma and Adjacent Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia
    Wong, Serena
    Buza, Natalia
    Hui, Pei
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2019, 32
  • [36] Retained PAX2 expression associated with DNA mismatch repair deficiency in endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma
    Zhang, Gloria X.
    Yang, Bin
    HISTOPATHOLOGY, 2024, 85 (05) : 794 - 803
  • [37] Targeted next-generation sequencing in the detection of mismatch repair deficiency in endometrial cancers
    Dong, Fei
    Costigan, Danielle C.
    Howitt, Brooke E.
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2019, 32 (02) : 252 - 257
  • [38] DNA mismatch repair-related protein loss as a prognostic factor in endometrial cancers
    Kato, Masafumi
    Takano, Masashi
    Miyamoto, Morikazu
    Sasaki, Naoki
    Goto, Tomoko
    Tsuda, Hitoshi
    Furuya, Kenichi
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2015, 26 (01) : 40 - 45
  • [39] Prognostic significance of solid growth in endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma
    Serra Akar
    Zeliha Esin Çelik
    Sıddıka Fındık
    Tolgay Tuyan İlhan
    Fedi Ercan
    Çetin Çelik
    International Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2020, 25 : 195 - 202
  • [40] Prognostic significance of solid growth in endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma
    Akar, Serra
    Celik, Zeliha Esin
    Findik, Siddika
    Ilhan, Tolgay Tuyan
    Ercan, Fedi
    Celik, Cetin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 25 (01) : 195 - 202