Advantages of structural inspection and diagnosis for traditional buildings? refurbishment: A Life Cycle Assessment perspective

被引:6
|
作者
Silva, Renata [1 ]
Surra, Elena [2 ]
Quelhas, Bruno [1 ]
Costa, Alexandre A. [1 ,3 ]
Lapa, Nuno [4 ]
Delerue-Matos, Cristina [2 ]
机构
[1] NCREP Consultoria Reabilitacao Edificado & Patrimo, Praca Coronel Pacheco 2, P-4050453 Porto, Portugal
[2] Inst Super Engn Porto, LAQV REQUIMTE, Grp Reacao & Alise Quim, Rua Dr Antonio Bernardino Almeida 431, P-4200072 Porto, Portugal
[3] Inst Super Engn Porto, Dept Engn Civil, CONSTRUCT LESE, Rua Dr Antonio Bernardino Almeida 431, P-4200072 Porto, Portugal
[4] NOVA Univ Lisbon, NOVA Sch Sci & Technol, Dept Quim, LAQV REQUIMTE, P-2829516 Caparica, Portugal
关键词
Life cycle assessment; Timber; Glued laminated timber; Concrete; Heritage buildings; Inspection and diagnosis; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; ENERGY; CONSTRUCTION; RECONSTRUCTION; DEMOLITION; TIMBER; ALTERNATIVES; STEEL; LCA;
D O I
10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109485
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This work demonstrated, through Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), the environmental advantages brought by the application of the Structural Inspection and Diagnosis (SID) methodology to the structural refurbishment of 7 traditional buildings located in the city of Porto (Portugal), when compared to the common total demolition and reconstruction approach.The early diagnosis of the conservation state of the existing structural elements, and their characterization provides fundamental information for optimizing the design of the refurbishment towards environmental sustainability. SID approach can reduce by 75.3%, on average, the demolished material and provide the lowest environmental burdens in the environmental categories of Global Warming, Acidification, Eutrophication, Ozone, and Abiotic Depletion, Photochemical Ozone Creation potential, Human Toxicity as well as Energy Demand when compared with the total demolition and reconstruction scenarios. In terms of relative environmental impact for the reconstruction scenarios, it was concluded that reinforced concrete, in the form of lightweight and solid slabs, presents the worst performance due to the concrete production process. Furthermore, timber structures show better environmental performance when compared to the use of glued laminated timber. The establishment of the SID tool as a consolidated methodology can be a unique opportunity to systematically include, in the refurbishment of traditional buildings, the principles of the environmental sustainability required by EU policies in the construction sector, providing a significant reduction of demolition wastes and the maximization of the preservation of existing structural materials.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Drivers of BIM-Based Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of Buildings: An Interpretive Structural Modelling Approach
    Onososen, Adetayo
    Musonda, Innocent
    Tjebane, Motheo Meta
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (17)
  • [42] Life Cycle Assessment of Dietary Patterns in the United States: A Full Food Supply Chain Perspective
    Kim, Daesoo
    Parajuli, Ranjan
    Thoma, Gregory J.
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (04)
  • [43] A comparative life cycle assessment of prefabricated and traditional construction - A case of a developing country
    Jayawardana, Janappriya
    Sandanayake, Malindu
    Jayasinghe, J. A. S. C.
    Kulatunga, Asela K.
    Zhang, Guomin
    JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2023, 72
  • [44] The life cycle impact of refurbishment packages on residential buildings with different initial thermal conditions
    Vavanou, Antonia
    Schwartz, Yair
    Mumovic, Dejan
    JOURNAL OF HOUSING AND THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 37 (02) : 951 - 1000
  • [45] Repercussion the use phase in the life cycle assessment of structures in residential buildings using one-way slabs
    Fraile-Garcia, Esteban
    Ferreiro-Cabello, Javier
    Martinez-Camara, Eduardo
    Jimenez-Macias, Emilio
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 143 : 191 - 199
  • [46] Barriers to BIM-Based Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment for Buildings: An Interpretive Structural Modelling Approach
    Onososen, Adetayo
    Musonda, Innocent
    BUILDINGS, 2022, 12 (03)
  • [47] Life Cycle Assessment of Concrete Production within a Circular Economy Perspective
    Cerchione, Roberto
    Colangelo, Francesco
    Farina, Ilenia
    Ghisellini, Patrizia
    Passaro, Renato
    Ulgiati, Sergio
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (14)
  • [48] Life-Cycle Assessment of Lightweight Partitions in Residential Buildings
    Pushkar, Svetlana
    BUILDINGS, 2024, 14 (06)
  • [49] Comparative life cycle assessment of passive and traditional residential buildings' use with a special focus on energy-related aspects
    Lewandowska, Anna
    Noskowiak, Andrzej
    Pajchrowski, Grzegorz
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2013, 67 : 635 - 646
  • [50] Review of Emergy Analysis and Life Cycle Assessment: Coupling Development Perspective
    Wang, Qingsong
    Xiao, Hongkun
    Ma, Qiao
    Yuan, Xueliang
    Zuo, Jian
    Zhang, Jian
    Wang, Shuguang
    Wang, Mansen
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (01)