Advantages of structural inspection and diagnosis for traditional buildings? refurbishment: A Life Cycle Assessment perspective

被引:6
|
作者
Silva, Renata [1 ]
Surra, Elena [2 ]
Quelhas, Bruno [1 ]
Costa, Alexandre A. [1 ,3 ]
Lapa, Nuno [4 ]
Delerue-Matos, Cristina [2 ]
机构
[1] NCREP Consultoria Reabilitacao Edificado & Patrimo, Praca Coronel Pacheco 2, P-4050453 Porto, Portugal
[2] Inst Super Engn Porto, LAQV REQUIMTE, Grp Reacao & Alise Quim, Rua Dr Antonio Bernardino Almeida 431, P-4200072 Porto, Portugal
[3] Inst Super Engn Porto, Dept Engn Civil, CONSTRUCT LESE, Rua Dr Antonio Bernardino Almeida 431, P-4200072 Porto, Portugal
[4] NOVA Univ Lisbon, NOVA Sch Sci & Technol, Dept Quim, LAQV REQUIMTE, P-2829516 Caparica, Portugal
关键词
Life cycle assessment; Timber; Glued laminated timber; Concrete; Heritage buildings; Inspection and diagnosis; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; ENERGY; CONSTRUCTION; RECONSTRUCTION; DEMOLITION; TIMBER; ALTERNATIVES; STEEL; LCA;
D O I
10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109485
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This work demonstrated, through Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), the environmental advantages brought by the application of the Structural Inspection and Diagnosis (SID) methodology to the structural refurbishment of 7 traditional buildings located in the city of Porto (Portugal), when compared to the common total demolition and reconstruction approach.The early diagnosis of the conservation state of the existing structural elements, and their characterization provides fundamental information for optimizing the design of the refurbishment towards environmental sustainability. SID approach can reduce by 75.3%, on average, the demolished material and provide the lowest environmental burdens in the environmental categories of Global Warming, Acidification, Eutrophication, Ozone, and Abiotic Depletion, Photochemical Ozone Creation potential, Human Toxicity as well as Energy Demand when compared with the total demolition and reconstruction scenarios. In terms of relative environmental impact for the reconstruction scenarios, it was concluded that reinforced concrete, in the form of lightweight and solid slabs, presents the worst performance due to the concrete production process. Furthermore, timber structures show better environmental performance when compared to the use of glued laminated timber. The establishment of the SID tool as a consolidated methodology can be a unique opportunity to systematically include, in the refurbishment of traditional buildings, the principles of the environmental sustainability required by EU policies in the construction sector, providing a significant reduction of demolition wastes and the maximization of the preservation of existing structural materials.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A review on Life Cycle Assessment, Life Cycle Energy Assessment and Life Cycle Carbon Emissions Assessment on buildings
    Chau, C. K.
    Leung, T. M.
    Ng, W. Y.
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 143 : 395 - 413
  • [2] Life cycle assessment of buildings and city quarters comparing demolition and reconstruction with refurbishment
    Weiler, Verena
    Harter, Hannes
    Eicker, Ursula
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2017, 134 : 319 - 328
  • [3] A Systematic Review of BIM-Based Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment for Buildings
    Berges-Alvarez, Ileana
    Martinez-Rocamora, Alejandro
    Marrero, Madelyn
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (24)
  • [4] Effects of structural system on the life cycle carbon footprint of buildings
    Nadoushani, Zahra S. Moussavi
    Akbarnezhad, Ali
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2015, 102 : 337 - 346
  • [5] ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES OF REFURBISHMENT VERSUS DEMOLITION AND RECONSTRUCTION: A COMPARATIVE LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF AN ITALIAN CASE STUDY
    Pittau, Francesco
    Giacomel, Dayana
    Iannaccone, Giuliana
    Malighetti, Laura
    JOURNAL OF GREEN BUILDING, 2020, 15 (04): : 155 - 172
  • [6] The Impact Assessment of Campus Buildings Based on a Life Cycle Assessment-Life Cycle Cost Integrated Model
    Xue, Zhuyuan
    Liu, Hongbo
    Zhang, Qinxiao
    Wang, Jingxin
    Fan, Jilin
    Zhou, Xia
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (01)
  • [7] Life cycle assessment of traditional and alternative bricks: A review
    Ramos Huarachi, Diego Alexis
    Goncalves, Giovanna
    de Francisco, Antonio Carlos
    Giovanetti Canteri, Maria Helene
    Piekarski, Cassiano Moro
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2020, 80
  • [8] From Buildings' End of Life to Aggregate Recycling under a Circular Economic Perspective: A Comparative Life Cycle Assessment Case Study
    Lachat, Ambroise
    Mantalovas, Konstantinos
    Desbois, Tiffany
    Yazoghli-Marzouk, Oumaya
    Colas, Anne-Sophie
    Di Mino, Gaetano
    Feraille, Adelaide
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (17)
  • [9] Comparative Study on Life-Cycle Assessment and Carbon Footprint of Hybrid, Concrete and Timber Apartment Buildings in Finland
    Rinne, Roni
    Ilgin, Hueseyin Emre
    Karjalainen, Markku
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (02)
  • [10] Review on building life cycle assessment from the perspective of structural design
    Wang, Zai
    Liu, Ying
    Shen, Shizhao
    JOURNAL OF ASIAN ARCHITECTURE AND BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2021, 20 (06) : 689 - 705