Comparison of membrane-based solutions for water reclamaton and desalination

被引:67
作者
Côté, P
Siverns, S
Monti, S
机构
[1] ZENON Environm Inc, Oakville, ON L6M 4B2, Canada
[2] ZENON Environm Srl, I-20066 Melzo, Mi, Italy
关键词
pre-treatment; water reuse; desalination; costs;
D O I
10.1016/j.desal.2005.04.015
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
The reclamation of effluents for irrigation and indirect potable water uses is rapidly developing as an alternative to seawater desalination. Two membrane-based options available to treat sewage for water reuse, tertiary filtration (TF) of the effluent from a conventional activated sludge (CAS) process and an integrated membrane bioreactor (MBR) are explored; in both cases, the level of treatment can be complemented by reverse osmosis (RO). These options are compared to desalination of seawater with both conventional multi-media membrane filtration. The capital costs for a plant producing water from seawater are about twice the costs of a plant reusing secondary sewage. Both the pretreatment costs and RO cost are higher. Similarly, the O&M costs for producing RO water from seawater are 2 times higher than the cost of reusing secondary sewage. The total life cycle costs for producing RO water from secondary effluent and seawater are 0.28US$/m(3) and 0.62US$/m(3) respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:251 / 257
页数:7
相关论文
共 1 条
[1]  
Cote P., 2004, DESALINATION WATER R, V13, P32