A global view of regulatory ecosystem services: existed knowledge, trends, and research gaps

被引:43
作者
Mengist, Wondimagegn [1 ,2 ]
Soromessa, Teshome [2 ]
Feyisa, Gudina Legese [2 ]
机构
[1] Debre Berhan Univ, Dept Nat Resource Management, Debre Berhan, Ethiopia
[2] Addis Ababa Univ, Ctr Environm Sci, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
关键词
Ecosystem; Ecosystem service indicators; Less tangible benefits; Regulatory ecosystem services; Research trend; Undervalued services; SUPPLY-AND-DEMAND; ECONOMIC VALUATION; DECISION-MAKING; LATIN-AMERICA; CONSERVATION; INDICATORS; FOREST; MUNICIPALITY; METAANALYSIS; PERSPECTIVE;
D O I
10.1186/s13717-020-00241-w
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Ecosystem services (ES) are growing fields of research. It helps to provide an inherent way to understand the synergy and trade-offs between human beings and their natural environment. Regulatory ecosystem services (RES) are significantly important to maintaining the world in which people can live, and control the negative effects of flood, disasters, and diseases. It can also provide regulatory services like ecosystem protection, human safety, and the provision of other ES. However, emerging ES decision-making agendas focus on ES that is tangible and has a direct link with human well-being. Thus, the attention given to RES is low due to its less tangible benefits and complexity to measure the benefits. Disregarding and lack of attention from policymakers and scientific community may lead to unintended risks to human well-being and significant influences on the provision of other ES. This study describes the research trends on RES, knowledge generated, and the major limitation. We concluded that though there is an exponential growth of scientific publications on ES, no adequate studies were found on RES. Also, the existed studies varied in their size and types of RES indicators covered, habitats/ecosystems, and geographic extent addressed. There was also a lack of connecting knowledge generated on the benefits of RES with the national policy of natural resource management, inconsistency of ES classification, and methodological diversity. Therefore, scientific communities are promoted to link RES studies with human health. Besides, the researcher should give priority for the least studied ecosystems and its services, developing robust methodology, and proposing management options to enhance the regulatory services of ecosystems.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 86 条
  • [1] Ecosystem services as a boundary object for sustainability
    Abson, D. J.
    von Wehrden, H.
    Baumgaertner, S.
    Fischer, J.
    Hanspach, J.
    Haerdtle, W.
    Heinrichs, H.
    Klein, A. M.
    Lang, D. J.
    Martens, P.
    Walmsley, D.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2014, 103 : 29 - 37
  • [2] Assessing regulating and provisioning ecosystem services in a contrasting tropical forest landscape
    Alamgir, Mohammed
    Turton, Stephen M.
    Macgregor, Colin J.
    Pert, Petina L.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2016, 64 : 319 - 334
  • [3] Alamgir Mohammed, 2014, International Journal of Biodiversity Science Ecosystem Services & Management, V10, P112, DOI 10.1080/21513732.2014.919961
  • [4] Comparing costs and supply of supporting and regulating services provided by urban parks at different spatial scales
    Almeida, C. M. V. B.
    Mariano, M. V.
    Agostinho, F.
    Liu, G. Y.
    Yang, Z. F.
    Coscieme, L.
    Giannetti, B. F.
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2018, 30 : 236 - 247
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2005, EC HUM WELL BEING SY
  • [6] Ecosystem services research in Latin America: The state of the art
    Balvanera, Patricia
    Uriarte, Maria
    Almeida-Lenero, Lucia
    Altesor, Alice
    DeClerck, Fabrice
    Gardner, Toby
    Hall, Jefferson
    Lara, Antonio
    Laterra, Pedro
    Pena-Claros, Marielos
    Silva Matos, Dalva M.
    Vogl, Adrian L.
    Piedad Romero-Duque, Luz
    Felipe Arreola, Luis
    Piedad Caro-Borrero, Angela
    Gallego, Federico
    Jain, Meha
    Little, Christian
    Xavier, Rafael de Oliveira
    Paruelo, Jose M.
    Emilio Peinado, Jesus
    Poorter, Lourens
    Ascarrunz, Nataly
    Correa, Francisco
    Cunha-Santino, Marcela B.
    Paula Hernandez-Sanchez, Amabel
    Vallejos, Maria
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2012, 2 : 56 - 70
  • [7] Identification, definition and quantification of goods and services provided by marine biodiversity: Implications for the ecosystem approach
    Beaumont, N. J.
    Austen, M. C.
    Atkins, J. P.
    Burdon, D.
    Degraer, S.
    Dentinho, T. P.
    Derous, S.
    Holm, P.
    Horton, T.
    van Ierland, E.
    Marboe, A. H.
    Starkey, D. J.
    Townsend, M.
    Zarzycki, T.
    [J]. MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2007, 54 (03) : 253 - 265
  • [8] Bicking S, 2018, One Ecosystem, V3, DOI [10.3897/oneeco.3.e22509, DOI 10.3897/ONEECO.3.E22509]
  • [9] What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units
    Boyd, James
    Banzhaf, Spencer
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 63 (2-3) : 616 - 626
  • [10] The ecosystem services agenda:bridging the worlds of natural science and economics, conservation and development, and public and private policy
    Braat, Leon C.
    de Groot, Rudolf
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2012, 1 (01) : 4 - 15