Dosimetric comparison between proton beam therapy and photon radiation therapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer

被引:6
|
作者
Wu, Chen-Ta [1 ,2 ]
Motegi, Atsushi [1 ]
Motegi, Kana [1 ]
Hotta, Kenji [1 ]
Kohno, Ryosuke [1 ]
Tachibana, Hidenobu [1 ]
Kumagai, Motoki [1 ]
Nakamura, Naoki [1 ]
Hojo, Hidehiro [1 ]
Niho, Seiji [3 ]
Goto, Koichi [3 ]
Akimoto, Tetsuo [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Canc Ctr Hosp East, Div Radiat Oncol & Particle Therapy, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
[2] Buddhist Tzu Chi Gen Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Hualien, Taiwan
[3] Natl Canc Ctr Hosp East, Dept Thorac Oncol, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
关键词
proton beam therapy; locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer; dosimetric analysis; 3DCRT; IMRT; DOSE CONFORMAL RADIOTHERAPY; PATIENT DATA METAANALYSIS; CHEMORADIATION THERAPY; RTOG; 0617; CONCURRENT; CHEMOTHERAPY; ESOPHAGITIS; TOXICITY; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1093/jjco/hyw108
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PBT with or without concurrent chemotherapy for the patients with stage III NSCLC was feasible and was superior to 3DCRT and IMRT for several dosimetric parameters.To assess the feasibility of proton beam therapy for the patients with locally advanced non-small lung cancer. The dosimetry was analyzed retrospectively to calculate the doses to organs at risk, such as the lung, heart, esophagus and spinal cord. A dosimetric comparison between proton beam therapy and dummy photon radiotherapy (three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy) plans was performed. Dummy intensity-modulated radiotherapy plans were also generated for the patients for whom curative three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy plans could not be generated. Overall, 33 patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer were treated with proton beam therapy between December 2011 and August 2014. The median age of the eligible patients was 67 years (range: 44-87 years). All the patients were treated with chemotherapy consisting of cisplatin/vinorelbine or carboplatin. The median prescribed dose was 60 GyE (range: 60-66 GyE). The mean normal lung V20 GyE was 23.6% (range: 14.9-32%), and the mean normal lung dose was 11.9 GyE (range: 6.0-19 GyE). The mean esophageal V50 GyE was 25.5% (range: 0.01-63.6%), the mean heart V40 GyE was 13.4% (range: 1.4-29.3%) and the mean maximum spinal cord dose was 40.7 GyE (range: 22.9-48 GyE). Based on dummy three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy planning, 12 patients were regarded as not being suitable for radical thoracic three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy. All the dose parameters of proton beam therapy, except for the esophageal dose, were lower than those for the dummy three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy plans. In comparison to the intensity-modulated radiotherapy plan, proton beam therapy also achieved dose reduction in the normal lung. None of the patients experienced grade 4 or worse non-hematological toxicities. Proton beam therapy for patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer was feasible and was superior to three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for several dosimetric parameters.
引用
收藏
页码:1008 / 1014
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Dosimetric comparison between proton beam therapy and photon radiation therapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
    Hirano, Yasuhiro
    Onozawa, Masakatsu
    Hojo, Hidehiro
    Motegi, Atsushi
    Zenda, Sadatomo
    Hotta, Kenji
    Moriya, Shunsuke
    Tachibana, Hidenobu
    Nakamura, Naoki
    Kojima, Takashi
    Akimoto, Tetsuo
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2018, 13
  • [2] Dosimetric comparison between proton beam therapy and photon radiation therapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
    Yasuhiro Hirano
    Masakatsu Onozawa
    Hidehiro Hojo
    Atsushi Motegi
    Sadatomo Zenda
    Kenji Hotta
    Shunsuke Moriya
    Hidenobu Tachibana
    Naoki Nakamura
    Takashi Kojima
    Tetsuo Akimoto
    Radiation Oncology, 13
  • [3] Dosimetric Comparisons between Proton Beam Therapy and Modern Photon Radiation Techniques for Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer According to Tumor Location
    Bayasgalan, Unurjargal
    Moon, Sung Ho
    Kim, Tae Hyun
    Kim, Tae Yoon
    Lee, Seung Hyun
    Suh, Yang-Gun
    CANCERS, 2021, 13 (24)
  • [4] Radiation therapy and combined treatment for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer
    Martel-Lafay, I.
    ONCOLOGIE, 2016, 18 (06) : 385 - 391
  • [5] Proton Beam Therapy versus Photon Radiotherapy for Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
    Suh, Yang-Gun
    Noh, Jae Myoung
    Lee, Doo Yeul
    Kim, Tae Hyun
    Bayasgalan, Unurjargal
    Pyo, Hongryull
    Moon, Sung Ho
    CANCERS, 2022, 14 (15)
  • [6] Enrollment of Elderly Patients With Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Multi-institutional Trials of Proton Beam Radiation Therapy
    Verma, Vivek
    Rwigema, Jean-Claude M.
    Adeberg, Sebastian
    Simone, Charles B., II
    CLINICAL LUNG CANCER, 2017, 18 (05) : 441 - 443
  • [7] Proton beam therapy reduces the risk of severe radiation-induced lymphopenia during chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A comparative analysis of proton versus photon therapy
    Kim, Nalee
    Noh, Jae Myoung
    Lee, Woojin
    Park, Byoungsuk
    Park, Heejoo
    Park, Ji Young
    Pyo, Hongryull
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2021, 156 : 166 - 173
  • [8] Breaking the dose ceiling: proton therapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer
    Choi, J. Isabelle
    Simone, Charles B., II
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2018, 10 (01) : 130 - 134
  • [9] PHYSICAL TARGETING OF LOCALLY ADVANCED NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER (NSCLC): PROTON THERAPY
    Cox, James D.
    Quynh Nguyen
    Allen, Pamela
    Ly, Ngoc B.
    Gomez, Daniel
    Chang, Joe
    Liao, Zhongxing
    Tsao, Anne
    Komaki, Ritsuko
    Lu, Charles
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2013, 8 : S597 - S597
  • [10] PROTON BEAM THERAPY VS. INTENSITY-MODULATED (X-RAY) RADIATION THERAPY FOR LOCALLY ADVANCED NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER
    Cox, James D.
    Wei, Xiong
    Allen, Pamela K.
    Amos, Richard
    Mohan, Radhe
    Chang, Joe Y.
    Liao, Zhongxing
    Dong, Lei
    Komaki, Ritsuko
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2011, 6 (06) : S496 - S497