Managing constructibility reviews to reduce highway project durations

被引:20
作者
Ford, DN [1 ]
Anderson, SD
Damron, AJ
Casas, RD
Gokmen, N
Kuennen, ST
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Civil Engn, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[2] Martin Rivett & Olson Inc, Roseville, CA 95661 USA
[3] Black & Veatch Consulting Engineers, Overland Pk, KS 66211 USA
[4] Atser LP, Houston, TX 77064 USA
[5] USAF Acad, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, DFCE, HQ, Colorado Springs, CO 80840 USA
关键词
constructibility; project management; scheduling; design/build; simulation; highway construction;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2004)130:1(33)
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Highway project durations that are longer than necessary delay the delivery of benefits to road users. Budget constraints often preclude the use of additional funds to shorten total project duration. Therefore, state highway agencies seek ways to decrease construction project durations without increasing costs. Research has recommended formal constructibility reviews as an effective approach to meeting this goal. Formalized constructibility reviews have been effective in isolated cases but only about one-quarter of state highway agencies currently have a formal constructibility review program. An inadequate understanding of implementation issues, including the effective use of resources, is a potential cause. The effects of constructibility reviews on the design phase, construction phase, and project durations are modeled and analyzed. Results illustrate and explain how intermediate-sized constructibility reviews reduce project durations more than very large or small reviews and the potential impacts of a design-build approach on constructibility review effectiveness.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 42
页数:10
相关论文
共 33 条
[21]  
Forrester J. W., 2013, Industrial Dynamics
[22]  
Forrester JW., 1980, TIMS STUDIES MANAGEM, V14, P209, DOI DOI 10.1016/0038-0121(80)90026-9
[23]  
HUGO F, 1990, HIGHWAY CONSTRUCT AB
[24]  
LIMAM M, 1995, THESIS TEXAS A M U
[25]   Strategic management of complex projects: a case study using system dynamics [J].
Lyneis, JM ;
Cooper, KG ;
Els, SA .
SYSTEM DYNAMICS REVIEW, 2001, 17 (03) :237-260
[26]   The constructibility review process: A constructor's perspective [J].
Mendelsohn, P .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT IN ENGINEERING, 1997, 13 (03) :17-19
[27]   IMPROVING HIGHWAY SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTIBILITY [J].
OCONNOR, JT ;
HUGO, F ;
STAMM, EM .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 1991, 117 (02) :242-258
[28]   System dynamics in project management: assessing the impacts of client behaviour on project performance [J].
Rodrigues, AG ;
Williams, TM .
JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 1998, 49 (01) :2-15
[29]  
RUSSELL JS, 2000, 1058 NAT COOP HIGHW
[30]  
RUSSELL JS, 1994, WISPR0594 WISC DEP T