Detecting critical choke points for achieving Good Environmental Status in European seas

被引：12

作者：

Potts, Tavis ^{[1
]}

O'Higgins, Tim ^{[2
]}

Brennan, Ruth ^{[2
]}

Cinnirella, Sergio ^{[3
]}

Brandt, Urs Steiner ^{[4
]}

Suarez de Vivero, Juan Luis ^{[5
]}

van Beusekom, Justus ^{[6
]}

Troost, Tineke A. ^{[7
]}

Paltriguera, Lucille ^{[8
]}

Hosgor, Ayse Gunduz ^{[9
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Aberdeen, Dept Geog & Environm, Aberdeen AB9 1FX, Scotland

[2] Scottish Assoc Marine Sci, Oban, Argyll, Scotland

[3] CNR, Inst Atmospher Pollut Res, I-00185 Rome, Italy

[4] Univ Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark

[5] Univ Seville, Seville, Spain

[6] Helmholtz Zentrum Geesthacht, D-21502 Geesthacht, Germany

[7] Deltares, Delft, Netherlands

[8] CEFAS, Lowestoft, Suffolk, England

[9] Middle E Tech Univ, Ankara, Turkey

来源：

ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY | 2015年 / 20卷 / 01期

关键词：

marine policy; Marine Strategy Framework Directive; marine sustainability; soft systems methodology; systems science; CONCEPTUAL-MODEL; SYSTEMS THINKING; NORTH-SEA; MARINE; MANAGEMENT; WATER;

D O I：

10.5751/ES-07280-200129

中图分类号：

Q14 [生态学（生物生态学）];

学科分类号：

071012 ; 0713 ;

摘要：

Choke points are social, cultural, political, institutional, or psychological obstructions of social-ecological systems that constrain progress toward an environmental objective. Using a soft systems methodology, different types of chokes points were identified in the Outer Hebrides of Scotland, the Baltic, and the North and Mediterranean seas. The choke points were of differing types: cultural and political choke points were identified in Barra and the Mediterranean, respectively, whereas the choke points in the North Sea and Baltic Sea were dependent on differing values toward the mitigation of eutrophication. We conclude with suggestions to identify and address choke points.

引用

页数：11

共 47 条

[31] How good is good? Human values and Europe's proposed Marine Strategy Directive [J].