Towards energy care ethics: Exploring ethical implications of relationality within energy systems in transition

被引:23
作者
Damgaard, Caroline Sejer [1 ]
McCauley, Darren [2 ]
Reid, Louise [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ St Andrews, Coll Gate, Sch Geog & Sustainable Dev, St Andrews KY16 9AJ, Fife, Scotland
[2] Erasmus Univ, Dept Publ Adm & Sociol, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, NL-3062 PA Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Energy ethics; Care ethics; Q-methodology; Low-carbon transition; Denmark; UK; CLIMATE-CHANGE; JUSTICE; RESPONSIBILITIES; PARTICIPATION; GEOGRAPHIES; NARRATIVES; USERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.erss.2021.102356
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Social science energy research is asking important questions about the social, political, and economic implications of energy transitions, and the consequent changing roles and relationships in the energy system. This has given rise to ethically driven research agendas, with an increasing focus on the need to better understand how people relate in their daily lives, both to mundane dilemmas around energy use, and to bigger questions around energy systems and energy system change. Based on insights from empirical Q-methodological research in Denmark and the UK, this article illustrates relational understandings of energy systems and a language of dependence, necessity and needs as important elements in how people make sense of the energy transition and their place in it. This challenges dominant frameworks and discourses of energy and energy transitions rooted in individualism and a language of individual responsibility, rational choice and/or individual rights and justice. In this article, we argue that a recognition of relationality and (inter)dependence as basic conditions of existence, and as basis for ethical reasoning in everyday engagements with energy in transition, is key to reflecting ways of relating to energy ethicalities in the everyday. This speaks strongly to recent advances of relational theories of energy systems and transitions, but calls for a recognition not only of inter-connections and relations, but of their ethical significance. To this end, we engage a feminist theory of care and care ethics in a proposition to 'think energy with care'.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 95 条
[31]   Funding pathways to a low-carbon transition [J].
Foulds, Chris ;
Christensen, Toke Haunstrup .
NATURE ENERGY, 2016, 1
[32]  
Fox Emmet, 2017, Energy & the Active Consumer-a Social Sciences and Humanities Cross-Cutting Theme Report
[33]   Energy ethics, homogenization, and hegemony: A reflection on the traditional energy paradigm [J].
Frigo, Giovanni .
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2017, 30 :7-17
[34]  
Fuller S., 2013, Energy Justice in a Changing Climate, P61
[35]  
Gilligan Carol., 1983, DIFFERENT VOICE PSYC
[36]   Smart grids, smart users? The role of the user in demand side management [J].
Goulden, Murray ;
Bedwell, Ben ;
Rennick-Egglestone, Stefan ;
Rodden, Tom ;
Spence, Alexa .
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2014, 2 :21-29
[37]  
Grinbaum A., 2013, Responsible Innovation, P119, DOI 10.1002/9781118551424.ch7
[38]  
Groves C, 2017, EMBEDDING NEW TECHNOLOGIES INTO SOCIETY: A REGULATORY, ETHICAL AND SOCIETAL PERSPECTIVE, P89
[39]   Sustainability and the future: reflections on the ethical and political significance of sustainability [J].
Groves, Christopher .
SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE, 2019, 14 (04) :915-924
[40]   THE POLITICAL IMAGINARY OF CARE: GENERIC VERSUS SINGULAR FUTURES [J].
Groves, Christopher .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL POLITICAL THEORY, 2011, 7 (02) :165-189