Performance of multiple docking and refinement methods in the pose prediction D3R prospective Grand Challenge 2016

被引:5
|
作者
Fradera, Xavier [1 ]
Verras, Andreas [2 ]
Hu, Yuan [2 ]
Wang, Deping [3 ]
Wang, Hongwu [2 ]
Fells, James I. [2 ]
Armacost, Kira A. [3 ]
Crespo, Alejandro [2 ]
Sherborne, Brad [2 ]
Wang, Huijun [2 ]
Peng, Zhengwei [2 ]
Gao, Ying-Duo [2 ]
机构
[1] Merck & Co Inc, 33 Ave Louis Pasteur, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Merck & Co Inc, 2000 Galloping Hill Rd, Kenilworth, NJ 07033 USA
[3] Merck & Co Inc, 770 Sumneytown Pike, West Point, PA 19486 USA
关键词
Pose prediction; D3R Grand Challenge 2016; Docking; Molecular dynamics; FXR; PROTEIN-LIGAND DOCKING; MOLECULAR-DYNAMICS; SCORING FUNCTIONS; BINDING ENTROPY; DATA-BANK; VALIDATION; IDENTIFICATION; GENERATION; ALGORITHM; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1007/s10822-017-0053-2
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
We describe the performance of multiple pose prediction methods for the D3R 2016 Grand Challenge. The pose prediction challenge includes 36 ligands, which represent 4 chemotypes and some miscellaneous structures against the FXR ligand binding domain. In this study we use a mix of fully automated methods as well as human-guided methods with considerations of both the challenge data and publicly available data. The methods include ensemble docking, colony entropy pose prediction, target selection by molecular similarity, molecular dynamics guided pose refinement, and pose selection by visual inspection. We evaluated the success of our predictions by method, chemotype, and relevance of publicly available data. For the overall data set, ensemble docking, visual inspection, and molecular dynamics guided pose prediction performed the best with overall mean RMSDs of 2.4, 2.2, and 2.2 respectively. For several individual challenge molecules, the best performing method is evaluated in light of that particular ligand. We also describe the protein, ligand, and public information data preparations that are typical of our binding mode prediction workflow.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 127
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Performance of multiple docking and refinement methods in the pose prediction D3R prospective Grand Challenge 2016
    Xavier Fradera
    Andreas Verras
    Yuan Hu
    Deping Wang
    Hongwu Wang
    James I. Fells
    Kira A. Armacost
    Alejandro Crespo
    Brad Sherborne
    Huijun Wang
    Zhengwei Peng
    Ying-Duo Gao
    Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 2018, 32 : 113 - 127
  • [2] Benchmarking ensemble docking methods in D3R Grand Challenge 4
    Jessie Low Gan
    Dhruv Kumar
    Cynthia Chen
    Bryn C. Taylor
    Benjamin R. Jagger
    Rommie E. Amaro
    Christopher T. Lee
    Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 2022, 36 : 87 - 99
  • [3] Benchmarking ensemble docking methods in D3R Grand Challenge 4
    Gan, Jessie Low
    Kumar, Dhruv
    Chen, Cynthia
    Taylor, Bryn C.
    Jagger, Benjamin R.
    Amaro, Rommie E.
    Lee, Christopher T.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2022, 36 (02) : 87 - 99
  • [4] Prospective evaluation of shape similarity based pose prediction method in D3R Grand Challenge 2015
    Kumar, Ashutosh
    Zhang, Kam Y. J.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2016, 30 (09) : 685 - 693
  • [5] Prospective evaluation of shape similarity based pose prediction method in D3R Grand Challenge 2015
    Ashutosh Kumar
    Kam Y. J. Zhang
    Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 2016, 30 : 685 - 693
  • [6] CDOCKER and λ-dynamics for prospective prediction in D3R Grand Challenge 2
    Ding, Xinqiang
    Hayes, Ryan L.
    Vilseck, Jonah Z.
    Charles, Murchtricia K.
    Brooks, Charles L., III
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2018, 32 (01) : 89 - 102
  • [7] Shape similarity guided pose prediction: lessons from D3R Grand Challenge 3
    Kumar, Ashutosh
    Zhang, Kam Y. J.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2019, 33 (01) : 47 - 59
  • [8] Protein–ligand pose and affinity prediction: Lessons from D3R Grand Challenge 3
    Panagiotis I. Koukos
    Li C. Xue
    Alexandre M. J. J. Bonvin
    Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 2019, 33 : 83 - 91
  • [9] Shape similarity guided pose prediction: lessons from D3R Grand Challenge 3
    Ashutosh Kumar
    Kam Y. J. Zhang
    Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 2019, 33 : 47 - 59
  • [10] Binding pose and affinity prediction in the 2016 D3R Grand Challenge 2 using the Wilma-SIE method
    Hervé Hogues
    Traian Sulea
    Francis Gaudreault
    Christopher R. Corbeil
    Enrico O. Purisima
    Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 2018, 32 : 143 - 150