Countering bias? The EU Commission's consultation with interest groups

被引:24
作者
Binderkrantz, Anne Skorkjaer [1 ]
Blom-Hansen, Jens [1 ]
Senninger, Roman [1 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Aarhus, Denmark
关键词
bias; consultations; EU Commission; interest groups; lobbying; stakeholders; CIVIL-SOCIETY; ONLINE CONSULTATIONS; SYSTEM; POLICY; POLITICS;
D O I
10.1080/13501763.2020.1748095
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
The EU Commission regularly consults with external actors when preparing policy proposals. This paper investigates possible bias in the voices the Commission listens to across all policy areas and consultation instruments. We map the full range of consultation instruments used by the Commission and analyse variation in group representation across types of consultations and policy areas. Our analysis draws on a dataset of more than 350 major Commission proposals between 2011 and 2016. We find that the Commission has established a consultation regime with the widespread use of standard consultation instruments, including open online consultations, stakeholder conferences and consultation in closed fora. The range of consulted actors depends on both consultation instruments and policy types. Open online-consultations are most inclusive. Our findings indicate that the Commission may be able to counteract the influence of business by selecting the most appropriate format for consultation.
引用
收藏
页码:469 / 488
页数:20
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Journal of European Integration
[2]  
[Anonymous], COM2001428 COMM
[3]   Is the EU different? Comparing the diversity of national and EU-level systems of interest organisations [J].
Berkhout, Joost ;
Hanegraaff, Marcel ;
Braun, Caelesta .
WEST EUROPEAN POLITICS, 2017, 40 (05) :1109-1131
[4]   Researching Interest Group Politics in Europe and Elsewhere: Much We Study, Little We Know? [J].
Beyers, Jan ;
Eising, Rainer ;
Maloney, William .
WEST EUROPEAN POLITICS, 2008, 31 (06) :1103-1128
[5]   what is access? a discussion of the definition and measurement of interest group access [J].
Binderkrantz, Anne S. ;
Pedersen, Helene H. .
EUROPEAN POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2017, 16 (03) :306-319
[6]   Comparing the domestic and the EU lobbying context: perceived agenda-setting influence in the multi-level system of the European Union [J].
Binderkrantz, Anne Skorkjaer ;
Rasmussen, Anne .
JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN PUBLIC POLICY, 2015, 22 (04) :552-569
[7]   Interest Group Access to the Bureaucracy, Parliament, and the Media [J].
Binderkrantz, Anne Skorkjaer ;
Christiansen, Peter Munk ;
Pedersen, Helene Helboe .
GOVERNANCE-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF POLICY ADMINISTRATION AND INSTITUTIONS, 2015, 28 (01) :95-112
[8]   A Privileged Position? The Influence of Business Interests in Government Consultations [J].
Binderkrantz, Anne Skorkjaer ;
Christiansen, Peter Munk ;
Pedersen, Helene Helboe .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2014, 24 (04) :879-896
[9]   Exchanging access goods for access: A comparative study of business lobbying in the European Union institutions [J].
Bouwen, P .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL RESEARCH, 2004, 43 (03) :337-369
[10]   Competing for consultation: Civil society and conflict between the European Commission and the European Parliament [J].
Bouwen, Pieter .
WEST EUROPEAN POLITICS, 2007, 30 (02) :265-284