Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX®) Results Calculated With and Without Bone Mineral Density Values for the Evaluation of Fracture Risk in Postmenopausal Women With Osteopenia

被引:6
|
作者
Imerci, Ahmet [1 ]
Kilinc, Cem Yalin [1 ]
Aydogan, Nevres Hurriyet [1 ]
Karalezli, Mustafa Nazim [1 ]
Savran, Ahmet [2 ]
机构
[1] Mugla Sitki Kocman Univ, Dept Orthopaed & Traumatol, Fac Med, Karamehmet Mah 19 Sokak 10,A Blok Daire 9 Mentese, Mugla, Turkey
[2] Izmir Katip Celebi Univ, Dept Hand Surg, Fac Med, Izmir, Turkey
关键词
Bone mineral density; fracture; FRAX (R); osteopenia; treatment threshold; OSTEOPOROTIC FRACTURES; T-SCORES; PREDICTION; BMD; FRAX(A(R)); AGREEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jocd.2017.06.027
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to evaluate the agreement between fracture risk predictions based on calculations made with and without bone mineral density (BMD) values using the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX (R)) in Turkish postmenopausal women with osteopenia and to compare the treatment recommendations. This descriptive, cross-sectional study included postmenopausal women aged 50-79 yr with a diagnosis of osteoporosis who were not receiving any treatment. A questionnaire was administered to the participants face-to-face to obtain sociodemographic characteristics, medical history, and fracture history. Fracture risk was calculated with FRAX (R) separately with and without BMD. The study included 230 postmenopausal patients with osteopenia. The mean age of the patients was determined as 63.16 +/- 7.59 yr, and the mean body mass index was 30.61 +/- 5.02. The intraclass correlation coefficient values of the 10-yr major osteoporotic (MO) fracture and hip fracture score agreement with FRAX (R) with and without BMD were mean 0.486 and 0.462, respectively. The risk of MO fracture with an intervention threshold of >= 20 was determined in 227/230 patients (98.7%), and the risk of hip fracture with treatment recommendations of >= 3 was determined in 204/230 patients (88.7%). Treatment recommendations in patients with no fracture history and secondary osteoporosis were 100% for MO fracture and 94.7% (123/130) for hip fracture risk. The treatment recommendation rates of FRAX (R) with and without BMD were similar for the majority of postmenopausal women with osteopenia. The agreement between the values was of a moderate level. When patients with a fracture history and secondary osteoporosis were excluded, the agreement increased. Even though values with BMD are of basic importance for medical treatment in postmenopausal women, the use of measurements evaluating fracture risk, such as FRAX (R) without BMD, could be useful in postmenopausal women with osteopenia.
引用
收藏
页码:464 / 471
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Fracture risk assessed by Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) compared with fracture risk derived from population fracture rates
    Rubin, Katrine Hass
    Abrahamsen, Bo
    Hermann, Anne Pernille
    Bech, Mickael
    Gram, Jeppe
    Brixen, Kim
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2011, 39 (03) : 312 - 318
  • [32] Fracture risk assessment without bone density measurement in routine clinical practice
    Leslie, W. D.
    Morin, S.
    Lix, L. M.
    Johansson, H.
    Oden, A.
    McCloskey, E.
    Kanis, J. A.
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 23 (01) : 75 - 85
  • [33] Abaloparatide effect on forearm bone mineral density and wrist fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis
    N.B. Watts
    G. Hattersley
    L.A. Fitzpatrick
    Y. Wang
    G.C. Williams
    P.D. Miller
    F. Cosman
    Osteoporosis International, 2019, 30 : 1187 - 1194
  • [34] Abaloparatide effect on forearm bone mineral density and wrist fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis
    Watts, N. B.
    Hattersley, G.
    Fitzpatrick, L. A.
    Wang, Y.
    Williams, G. C.
    Miller, P. D.
    Cosman, F.
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 30 (06) : 1187 - 1194
  • [35] Fracture risk among treatment-naive postmenopausal women with osteopenia in Greece: results from the "ACROSS" study
    Anastasilakis, Athanasios D.
    Makras, Polyzois
    ARCHIVES OF OSTEOPOROSIS, 2020, 15 (01)
  • [36] Risk of osteoporotic fracture in women using the FRAX tool with and without bone mineral density score in patients followed at a tertiary outpatient clinic-An observational study
    Sampaio Favarato, Maria Helena
    de Almeida, Maria Flora
    Lichtenstein, Arnaldo
    Martins, Milton de Arruda
    Ferreira Junior, Mario
    CLINICS, 2022, 77
  • [37] Evaluation of the FRAX and Garvan Fracture Risk Calculators in Older Women
    Bolland, Mark J.
    Siu, Amanda T. Y.
    Mason, Barbara H.
    Horne, Anne M.
    Ames, Ruth W.
    Grey, Andrew B.
    Gamble, Greg D.
    Reid, Ian R.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2011, 26 (02) : 420 - 427
  • [38] Comparison of bone mineral density and vertebral fracture assessment in postmenopausal women with and without distal radius fractures
    Amphansap, Tanawat
    Rattanaphonglekha, Chayaphong
    Vechasilp, Jaruwat
    Stitkitti, Nitirat
    Apiromyanont, Kamonchalat
    Therdyothin, Atiporn
    OSTEOPOROSIS AND SARCOPENIA, 2021, 7 (04) : 134 - 139
  • [39] ?Is radius bone mineral density helpful for fracture risk assessment?
    Biver, Emmanuel
    OSTEOLOGIE, 2019, 28 (02) : 109 - 111
  • [40] Usefulness of Fracture Risk Assessment Tool Using Lumbar Bone Mineral Density in Prediction of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture
    Lee, Heui Seung
    Lee, Sang Hyung
    Chung, Young Seob
    Yang, Hee-Jin
    Son, Young-Je
    Park, Sung Bae
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN NEUROSURGICAL SOCIETY, 2015, 58 (04) : 346 - 349