Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX®) Results Calculated With and Without Bone Mineral Density Values for the Evaluation of Fracture Risk in Postmenopausal Women With Osteopenia

被引:6
|
作者
Imerci, Ahmet [1 ]
Kilinc, Cem Yalin [1 ]
Aydogan, Nevres Hurriyet [1 ]
Karalezli, Mustafa Nazim [1 ]
Savran, Ahmet [2 ]
机构
[1] Mugla Sitki Kocman Univ, Dept Orthopaed & Traumatol, Fac Med, Karamehmet Mah 19 Sokak 10,A Blok Daire 9 Mentese, Mugla, Turkey
[2] Izmir Katip Celebi Univ, Dept Hand Surg, Fac Med, Izmir, Turkey
关键词
Bone mineral density; fracture; FRAX (R); osteopenia; treatment threshold; OSTEOPOROTIC FRACTURES; T-SCORES; PREDICTION; BMD; FRAX(A(R)); AGREEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jocd.2017.06.027
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to evaluate the agreement between fracture risk predictions based on calculations made with and without bone mineral density (BMD) values using the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX (R)) in Turkish postmenopausal women with osteopenia and to compare the treatment recommendations. This descriptive, cross-sectional study included postmenopausal women aged 50-79 yr with a diagnosis of osteoporosis who were not receiving any treatment. A questionnaire was administered to the participants face-to-face to obtain sociodemographic characteristics, medical history, and fracture history. Fracture risk was calculated with FRAX (R) separately with and without BMD. The study included 230 postmenopausal patients with osteopenia. The mean age of the patients was determined as 63.16 +/- 7.59 yr, and the mean body mass index was 30.61 +/- 5.02. The intraclass correlation coefficient values of the 10-yr major osteoporotic (MO) fracture and hip fracture score agreement with FRAX (R) with and without BMD were mean 0.486 and 0.462, respectively. The risk of MO fracture with an intervention threshold of >= 20 was determined in 227/230 patients (98.7%), and the risk of hip fracture with treatment recommendations of >= 3 was determined in 204/230 patients (88.7%). Treatment recommendations in patients with no fracture history and secondary osteoporosis were 100% for MO fracture and 94.7% (123/130) for hip fracture risk. The treatment recommendation rates of FRAX (R) with and without BMD were similar for the majority of postmenopausal women with osteopenia. The agreement between the values was of a moderate level. When patients with a fracture history and secondary osteoporosis were excluded, the agreement increased. Even though values with BMD are of basic importance for medical treatment in postmenopausal women, the use of measurements evaluating fracture risk, such as FRAX (R) without BMD, could be useful in postmenopausal women with osteopenia.
引用
收藏
页码:464 / 471
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Association of Obesity with Forearm Fractures, Bone Mineral Density and Fracture Risk (FRAX (R)) During Postmenopausal Period
    Mesci, Erkan
    Mesci, Nilgun
    Icagasioglu, Afitap
    Madenci, Ercan
    TURK OSTEOPOROZ DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF OSTEOPOROSIS, 2016, 22 (02): : 80 - 84
  • [22] Bone Density Measurement and Assessment of Fracture Risk
    Lewiecki, E. Michael
    CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 56 (04): : 667 - 676
  • [23] Muscle strength is associated with fracture risk obtained by fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) in women with breast cancer
    Marques Bernabe, Rayne de Almeida
    Vieira, Mariana de Souza
    de Souza, Vanusa Felicio
    Fontana, Luana Gomes
    Albergaria, Ben-Hur
    Marques-Rocha, Jose Luiz
    Guandalini, Valdete Regina
    BMC CANCER, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [24] WHO Absolute Fracture Risk Models (FRAX): Do Clinical Risk Factors Improve Fracture Prediction in Older Women Without Osteoporosis?
    Hillier, Teresa A.
    Cauley, Jane A.
    Rizzo, Joanne H.
    Pedula, Kathryn L.
    Ensrud, Kristine E.
    Bauer, Douglas C.
    Lui, Li-Yung
    Vesco, Kimberly K.
    Black, Dennis M.
    Donaldson, Meghan G.
    LeBlanc, Erin S.
    Cummings, Steven R.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2011, 26 (08) : 1774 - 1782
  • [25] Muscle strength is associated with fracture risk obtained by fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) in women with breast cancer
    Rayne de Almeida Marques Bernabé
    Mariana de Souza Vieira
    Vanusa Felício de Souza
    Luana Gomes Fontana
    Ben-Hur Albergaria
    José Luiz Marques-Rocha
    Valdete Regina Guandalini
    BMC Cancer, 22
  • [26] Spine-Hip Discordance and FRAX assessment Fracture Risk in Postmenopausal Women with Osteopenia from Concordant Diagnosis Between Lumbar Spine and Femoral Neck
    Goh, Tae Sik
    Kim, Eunheui
    Jeon, Yun Kyung
    Hwangbo, Lee
    Kim, In-Joo
    Pak, Kyoungjune
    Kim, Seong-Jang
    Kim, Keunyoung
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2021, 24 (04) : 548 - 556
  • [27] Clinical evaluation of osteoporosis and fracture risk in postmenopausal women
    McClung B.
    Clinical Reviews in Bone and Mineral Metabolism, 2006, 4 (1): : 15 - 23
  • [28] Evaluation of Usage of a Fracture Risk Assessment by FRAX Tool in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
    Monteiro, Silvia Santos
    Santos, Tiago da Silva
    Fonseca, Liliana
    Dores, Jorge
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (02)
  • [29] Troubling Aspects of the Trabecular Bone Score Adjustment for the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX®)
    Mayer, Martin
    Greenblatt, Aaron
    CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 111 (02) : 224 - 225
  • [30] Fracture risk in early postmenopausal women assessed using FRAX®
    Tremollieres, Florence
    Cochet, Tiffany
    Cohade, Clementine
    Pouilles, Jean-Michel
    Ribot, Claude
    JOINT BONE SPINE, 2010, 77 (04) : 345 - 348