Comparative study between the effects of photodynamic therapy and conventional therapy on microbial reduction in ligature-induced peri-implantitis in dogs

被引:123
作者
Hayek, RRA
Araújo, NS
Gioso, MA
Ferreira, J
Baptista-Sobrinho, CA
Yamada, AM
Ribeiro, MS
机构
[1] IPEN CNEN SP, Inst Nucl & Energet Res, Laser & Applicat Ctr, BR-05508900 Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Dent, Dept Pathol, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Vet Med & Zootech, Dept Surg, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[4] Osasco, Brazilian Army, Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
animal studies; bacteria/growth; peri-implant diseases/prevention and control; peri-implant diseases/microbiology; phototherapy;
D O I
10.1902/jop.2005.76.8.1275
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background: Progressive peri-implant bone losses, which are accompanied by inflammatory lesions in the soft tissues, are referred to as peri-implantitis. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of photodynamic therapy (PDT) and conventional technique on microbial reduction in ligature-induced peri-implantitis in dogs. Methods: Eighteen third premolars from nine Labrador retriever dogs were extracted and the implants were submerged. After osseointegration, peri-implantitis was induced. After 4 months, ligature was removed and natural bacterial plaque was allowed to form for another 4 months. The animals were then randomly divided into two groups. In the conventional group, they were treated using mucoperiosteal flaps for scaling the implant surface and chlorexidine (conventional) irrigation. In the PDT group, only mucoperiosteal scaling was carried out before photodynamic therapy. Inside the peri-implant pocket, a paste-based azulene photosensitizer was placed and then a GaAlAs low-power laser (lambda = 660 nm, P = 40 mW, E = 7.2 J for 3 minutes) was used. Microbiological samples were obtained before and immediately after treatment. Before treatment, one implant was removed and analyzed by scanning electron microscopy to validate the contamination. Results: The results of this study showed that Prevotella sp., Fusobacterium sp., and S. Beta-haemolyticus were significantly reduced for both groups. After treatment, no significant differences were observed between the groups. Conclusion: These findings suggest that photodynamic therapy is a non-invasive method that could be used to reduce microorganisms in peri-implantitis.
引用
收藏
页码:1275 / 1281
页数:7
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [11] Elimination of bacteria on different implant surfaces through photosensitization and soft laser - An in vitro study
    Haas, R
    Dortbudak, O
    MensdorffPouilly, N
    Mailath, G
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 1997, 8 (04) : 249 - 254
  • [12] Jovanovic S A, 1994, Curr Opin Periodontol, P194
  • [14] Root surface temperature increase during Er:YAG laser irradiation of root canals
    Kimura, Y
    Yonaga, K
    Yokoyama, K
    Kinoshita, J
    Ogata, Y
    Matsumoto, K
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2002, 28 (02) : 76 - 78
  • [15] Klokkevold PR, 2000, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V15, P56
  • [16] In vivo killing of Porphyromonas gingivalis by toluidine blue-mediated photosensitization in an animal model
    Kömerik, N
    Nakanishi, H
    MacRobert, AJ
    Henderson, B
    Speight, P
    Wilson, M
    [J]. ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2003, 47 (03) : 932 - 940
  • [17] Five-year clinical, microbiological, and radiological outcome following treatment of peri-implantitis in man
    Leonhardt, Å
    Dahlén, G
    Renvert, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2003, 74 (10) : 1415 - 1422
  • [18] Machado M A, 1999, J Oral Sci, V41, P181
  • [19] Microbiology and antimicrobial therapy of peri-implantitis
    Mombelli, A
    [J]. PERIODONTOLOGY 2000, 2002, 28 : 177 - 189
  • [20] Treatment of peri-implantitis by local delivery of tetracycline -: Clinical, microbiological and radiological results
    Mombelli, A
    Feloutzis, A
    Brägger, U
    Lang, NP
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2001, 12 (04) : 287 - 294