Calculating dry matter consumption of dairy herds in Australia: the need to fully account for energy requirements and issues with estimating energy supply

被引:21
作者
Heard, J. W. [1 ]
Doyle, P. T. [2 ]
Francis, S. A.
Staines, M. v. H. [3 ]
Wales, W. J. [4 ]
机构
[1] Dept Primary Ind Hamilton, Hamilton, Vic 3300, Australia
[2] Peter Doyle Consulting, Suffolk Pk, NSW 2481, Australia
[3] Dept Agr & Food, Busselton, WA 6280, Australia
[4] Dept Primary Ind Ellinbank, Ellinbank, Vic 3820, Australia
来源
ANIMAL PRODUCTION SCIENCE | 2011年 / 51卷 / 07期
关键词
back calculation; forage; forage consumption; CONCORDANCE CORRELATION-COEFFICIENT; EARLY LACTATION; HERBAGE INTAKE; COWS; PASTURE; PERFORMANCE; SUPPLEMENTATION; DIGESTIBILITY; PREDICTION; DIGESTION;
D O I
10.1071/AN10079
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Feed costs are the major component of the variable costs and a significant component of the total costs of milk production on Australian dairy farms. To improve farm productivity, farmers need to understand how much feed is being consumed and the nutritive characteristics of the diet. This paper reviews an existing simple approach, the 'Target 10' approach, which is commonly used by the dairy industry in Victoria to estimate annual forage consumption. An alternative approach - the 'Feeding Systems' approach - is then introduced. The 'Feeding Systems' approach is compared with estimated forage consumption measured under experimental conditions. An analysis of the sensitivity of both approaches to incremental changes in key variables is presented. The 'Feeding Standards' approach was concordant with estimated forage consumption measured under experimental conditions. Sensitivity analysis has highlighted key variables which may have considerable influence over simulated forage consumption using this approach. Given that none of the key variables tested in this analysis can be varied in the 'Target 10' approach, we feel confident that the 'Feeding Standards' approach provides an improved method of back-calculating annual on-farm forage consumption. Using a robust approach to calculate forage consumption which fully accounts for metabolisable energy requirements is important where farmers are using home-grown forage consumption as an indicator of farm feeding system performance. It is also important to understand the assumptions involved in estimating metabolisable energy supply from either supplements or forage.
引用
收藏
页码:605 / 614
页数:10
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Alderman G., 1993, Energy and protein requirements of ruminants: an advisory manual
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1980, NUTR REQ RUM LIV
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2001, NATL ACAD SCI
[4]  
*ARC, 1965, NUTR REQ FARM LIV 2
[5]   Ruminal digestion and fermentation of high-producing dairy cows with three different feeding systems combining pasture and total mixed rations [J].
Bargo, F ;
Muller, LD ;
Varga, GA ;
Delahoy, JE ;
Cassidy, TW .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2002, 85 (11) :2964-2973
[6]   Feed conversion efficiency as a key determinant of dairy herd performance: a review [J].
Beever, D. E. ;
Doyle, P. T. .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE, 2007, 47 (06) :645-657
[7]  
BOOMSMA J, 1996, TARGET 10 1 3 YEARS
[8]   FAT PARTITIONING IN BRITISH FRIESIAN COWS - THE INFLUENCE OF PHYSIOLOGICAL-STATE ON DISSECTED BODY-COMPOSITION [J].
BUTLERHOGG, BW ;
WOOD, JD ;
BINES, JA .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE, 1985, 104 (JUN) :519-528
[9]   Pasture and forage crop systems for non-irrigated dairy farms in southern Australia. 1. Physical production and economic performance [J].
Chapman, D. F. ;
Kenny, S. N. ;
Beca, D. ;
Johnson, I. R. .
AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2008, 97 (03) :108-125
[10]   LOW-COST PEPSIN CELLULASE ASSAYS FOR PREDICTION OF DIGESTIBILITY OF HERBAGE [J].
CLARKE, T ;
FLINN, PC ;
MCGOWAN, AA .
GRASS AND FORAGE SCIENCE, 1982, 37 (02) :147-150