Residual Drift Response of SMRFs and BRB Frames in Steel Buildings Designed according to ASCE 7-05

被引:433
作者
Erochko, Jeffrey [1 ]
Christopoulos, Constantin [1 ]
Tremblay, Robert [2 ]
Choi, Hyunhoon [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Civil Engn, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
[2] Ecole Polytech, Dept Civil Geol & Min Engn, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Dept Architectural Engn, Seoul, South Korea
来源
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING-ASCE | 2011年 / 137卷 / 05期
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Nonlinear response; Residual drifts; Steel frames; Aftershocks; RESTRAINED BRACED FRAMES; MOMENT-RESISTING FRAMES; SEISMIC RESPONSE; FREEDOM SYSTEMS; PERFORMANCE; CONNECTIONS; DEFORMATIONS; SPECTRUM; DEMANDS;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000296
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
A recent study has shown that residual drifts after earthquakes that are greater than 0.5% in buildings may represent a complete loss of the structure from an economic perspective. To study the comparative residual drift response of special moment-resisting frames (SMRFs) and buckling-restrained braced (BRB) frames, buildings between 2 and 12 stories in height are designed according to ASCE 7-05 and investigated numerically. This investigation includes pushover analyses as well as two-dimensional nonlinear time-history analyses for two ground motion hazard levels. The two systems show similar peak drifts and drift concentration factors. The BRB frames experience larger residual drifts than the SMRFs; however, the scatter in the residual drift results is large. Expressions are proposed to estimate the residual drifts of these systems as a function of the expected peak drifts, the initial recoverable elastic drift, and the drift concentration factor of each system. When subjected to a second identical earthquake, both framing systems experienced larger-than-expected drifts when an initial drift greater than 0.5% was present. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000296. (C) 2011 American Society of Civil Engineers.
引用
收藏
页码:589 / 599
页数:11
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
*AISC, 2005, 341S105 ANSIAISC S, V1
[2]  
*AISC, 2005, 36005 ANSIAISC S, V1
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1996, NCEER960010 STAT U N
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2004, P 13 WORLD C EARTHQ
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2000, FEMA356
[6]  
*ASCE, 2005, 705 ASCESEI S, V1
[7]  
Carr A.J., 2005, RUAUMOKO PROGRAM INE
[8]  
CHOI H, 2008, 052008 U TOR DEPT CI
[9]   Self-centering energy dissipative bracing system for the seismic resistance of structures: Development and validation [J].
Christopoulos, C. ;
Tremblay, R. ;
Kim, H. -J. ;
Lacerte, M. .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2008, 134 (01) :96-107
[10]   Performance-based seismic response of frame structures including residual deformations. Part I: Single-degree of freedom systems [J].
Christopoulos, C ;
Pampanin, S ;
Priestley, MJN .
JOURNAL OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2003, 7 (01) :97-118