Reengineering CelA2 cellulase for hydrolysis in aqueous solutions of deep eutectic solvents and concentrated seawater

被引:97
作者
Lehmann, Christian [1 ]
Sibilla, Fabrizio [1 ,2 ]
Maugeri, Zaira [3 ]
Streit, Wolfgang R. [4 ]
de Maria, Pablo Dominguez [3 ]
Martinez, Ronny [1 ]
Schwaneberg, Ulrich [1 ]
机构
[1] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Lehrstuhl Biotechnol, D-52074 Aachen, Germany
[2] Nova Inst GmbH, D-50354 Hurth, Germany
[3] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, ITMC, D-52074 Aachen, Germany
[4] Univ Hamburg, Biozentrum Klein Flottbek, Abt Mikrobiol & Biotechnol, D-22609 Hamburg, Germany
关键词
DIRECTED EVOLUTION; IONIC LIQUIDS; ENZYMATIC-HYDROLYSIS; TRICHODERMA-REESEI; BIOTRANSFORMATIONS; DISSOLUTION; MUTAGENESIS; SUBSTRATE; MIXTURES; PLASMID;
D O I
10.1039/c2gc35790a
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Cellulases are promising catalysts for the depolymerization of cellulose under mild conditions. Reengineered cellulases are required to match application demands in biorefineries and to avoid cost-intensive downstream processing. This manuscript provides a novel fluorescence-based high throughput screening method for directed evolution of cellulases, based on 4-methylumbelliferyl-beta-D-cellobioside (4-MUC). The 4-MUC high throughput screening system was successfully employed to identify CelA2 variants with enhanced stability and activity in mixtures of water with deep eutectic solvents like choline chloride : glycerol (ChCl : Gly), and seawater. The cellulase variant 4D1 (L21P; L184Q; H288R; K299I; D330G; N442D) was isolated and showed, compared to wild type, an increase in specific activity in 30% (v/v) ChCl : Gly (7.5-fold; 0.4 to 3.0 U mg(-1)) and in concentrated seawater (1.6-fold; 5.5 to 9.3 U mg(-1)). In addition, the residual activity of 4D1 in the presence of 3-fold concentrated seawater is unaffected whereas CelA2 wild type loses >50% of its activity. Furthermore, the position H288 was identified as a key position for activity and resistance in 4D1.
引用
收藏
页码:2719 / 2726
页数:8
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] O-acetylation of cellulose and monosaccharides using a zinc based ionic liquid
    Abbott, AP
    Bell, TJ
    Handa, S
    Stoddart, B
    [J]. GREEN CHEMISTRY, 2005, 7 (10) : 705 - 707
  • [2] Deep eutectic solvents formed between choline chloride and carboxylic acids: Versatile alternatives to ionic liquids
    Abbott, AP
    Boothby, D
    Capper, G
    Davies, DL
    Rasheed, RK
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2004, 126 (29) : 9142 - 9147
  • [3] Novel solvent properties of choline chloride/urea mixtures
    Abbott, AP
    Capper, G
    Davies, DL
    Rasheed, RK
    Tambyrajah, V
    [J]. CHEMICAL COMMUNICATIONS, 2003, (01) : 70 - 71
  • [4] [Anonymous], [No title captured]
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2012, Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual
  • [6] Phosphorothioate-based ligase-independent gene cloning (PLICing): An enzyme-free and sequence-independent cloning method
    Blanusa, Milan
    Schenk, Alexander
    Sadeghi, Hengameh
    Marienhagen, Jan
    Schwaneberg, Ulrich
    [J]. ANALYTICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 2010, 406 (02) : 141 - 146
  • [7] A SENSITIVE METHOD USING 4-METHYLUMBELLIFERYL-BETA-CELLOBIOSE AS A SUBSTRATE TO MEASURE (1,4)-BETA-GLUCANASE ACTIVITY IN SEDIMENTS
    BOSCHKER, HTS
    CAPPENBERG, TE
    [J]. APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1994, 60 (10) : 3592 - 3596
  • [8] CONTINUOUS PHOTOMETRIC-DETERMINATION OF ENDO-1,4-BETA-D-GLUCANASE (CELLULASE) ACTIVITY USING 4-METHYLUMBELLIFERYL-BETA-D-CELLOBIOSIDE AS A SUBSTRATE
    CHERNOGLAZOV, VM
    JAFAROVA, AN
    KLYOSOV, AA
    [J]. ANALYTICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 1989, 179 (01) : 186 - 189
  • [9] Ionic liquid tolerant hyperthermophilic cellulases for biomass pretreatment and hydrolysis
    Datta, Supratim
    Holmes, Bradley
    Park, Joshua I.
    Chen, Zhiwei
    Dibble, Dean C.
    Hadi, Masood
    Blanch, Harvey W.
    Simmons, Blake A.
    Sapra, Rajat
    [J]. GREEN CHEMISTRY, 2010, 12 (02) : 338 - 345
  • [10] Ionic liquids in biotransformations: from proof-of-concept to emerging deep-eutectic-solvents
    de Maria, Pablo Dominguez
    Maugeri, Zaira
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN CHEMICAL BIOLOGY, 2011, 15 (02) : 220 - 225