Working to eliminate multiple pregnancies: a success story in Quebec

被引:57
作者
Bissonnette, F. [1 ]
Phillips, S. J. [1 ]
Gunby, J. [2 ]
Holzer, H. [3 ]
Mahutte, N. [4 ]
St-Michel, P. [5 ]
Kadoch, I. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] OVO Fertil, Montreal, PQ H4P 2S4, Canada
[2] Canadian ART Register, Burlington, ON L7P 4E4, Canada
[3] McGill Reprod Ctr, Montreal, PQ H3A 1A1, Canada
[4] Montreal Fertil Ctr, Montreal, PQ H4A 3S5, Canada
[5] Procrea Clin, Mont Royal, PQ H3P 2W3, Canada
关键词
cumulative pregnancy rate; eSET; funding; IVF; multiple pregnancies; SINGLE EMBRYO-TRANSFER; ELECTIVE SINGLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.05.020
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
In August 2010, the provincial government of Quebec, Canada introduced funding of assisted reproduction treatment through the provincial health programme. Alongside this benefit, legislation was introduced to control assisted reproduction treatment activities in the province, including restrictions on the number of embryos that could be transferred in any one cycle. The aim of the programme was to transfer a single embryo in every cycle; multiple embryos could be transferred under suboptimal conditions but required physician justification. In the first 3 months of this programme, 1353 cycles of IVF were performed in five Quebec assisted reproduction centres, with an overall clinical pregnancy rate of 32% per embryo transfer and 50% of transfers used elective single-embryo transfer (eSET). The multiple-pregnancy rate was only 3.7% per clinical pregnancy. In 2009, prior to the introduction of the programme, eSET was used in only 1.6% of embryo transfers, resulting in a multiple-pregnancy rate of 25.6%. These data demonstrate that providing provincially funded assisted reproduction treatment created an environment in which the aggressive use of eSET was not only possible, but also rapidly implemented. The result was a dramatic drop in multiple-pregnancy rates, approaching those for natural pregnancies. (C) 2011, Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:500 / 504
页数:5
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2010, GAZETTE OFFICIE 0721, V142
[2]  
Assisted Human Reproduction Canada, 2011, PREV MULT BIRTHS ASS
[3]  
Bromer J.G., 2011, CURR OPIN OBSTET GYN
[4]   Cumulative results including obstetrical and neonatal outcome of fresh and frozen-thawed cycles in elective single versus double fresh embryo transfers [J].
Fauque, Patricia ;
Jouannet, Pierre ;
Davy, Celine ;
Guibert, Juliette ;
Viallon, Vivian ;
Epelboin, Sylvie ;
Kunstmann, Jean-Marie ;
Patrat, Catherine .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2010, 94 (03) :927-935
[5]   Single-embryo transfer versus multiple-embryo transfer [J].
Gerris, Jan .
REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2009, 18 :S63-S70
[6]  
Gunby J., 2010, Fertil Steril
[7]   Clinical effectiveness of elective single versus double embryo transfer: meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials [J].
McLernon, D. J. ;
Harrild, K. ;
Bergh, C. ;
Davies, M. J. ;
de Neubourg, D. ;
Dumoulin, J. C. M. ;
Gerris, J. ;
Kremer, J. A. M. ;
Martikainen, H. ;
Mol, B. W. ;
Norman, R. J. ;
Thurin-Kjellberg, A. ;
Tiitinen, A. ;
van Montfoort, A. P. A. ;
van Peperstraten, A. M. ;
Van Royen, E. ;
Bhattacharya, S. .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 341 :34
[8]   Elective single embryo transfer versus double embryo transfer in assisted reproduction [J].
Moustafa, Mohamed Khaled ;
Sheded, Sheded Ashour ;
Mousta, Mohamed Abd El Aziz .
REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2008, 17 (01) :82-87
[9]   Why don't we perform elective single embryo transfer? A qualitative study among IVF patients and professionals [J].
van Peperstraten, A. M. ;
Nelen, W. L. D. M. ;
Hermens, R. P. M. G. ;
Jansen, L. ;
Scheenje, E. ;
Braat, D. D. M. ;
Grol, R. P. T. M. ;
Kremer, J. A. M. .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2008, 23 (09) :2036-2042