Effect of institutional and firm-specific characteristics on post-privatization performance: Evidence from developed countries

被引:95
作者
D'Souza, J
Megginson, W
Nash, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Wake Forest Univ, Babcock Grad Sch Management, Winston Salem, NC 27109 USA
[2] Clayton State Coll & Univ, Dept Finance, Morrow, GA 30260 USA
[3] Univ Oklahoma, Price Coll Business, Norman, OK 73019 USA
关键词
privatization; corporate governance;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2004.12.001
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This study adds to the empirical evidence that privatization improves the performance of divested firms and offers preliminary evidence as to why these performance improvements occur. Using a sample of 129 share-issue privatizations from 23 developed (OECD) countries, we first document significant increases in profitability, efficiency, output, and capital expenditure following privatization. Our data indicate that ownership (both private and foreign), degree of economic freedom, and level of capital market development significantly affect post-privatization performance. A comparison to the findings of Boubakri et al. (2005) [Boubakri, N., Cosset, J., Guedmani, O., 2005. Liberalization, corporate governance, and the performance of newly privatized firms. Journal of Corporate Finance (this issue)] suggests that several determinants of post-privatization performance improvements differ between developed and developing countries. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:747 / 766
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] CEO characteristics and firm performance: evidence from a Southeast Asian country
    Suherman, Suherman
    Mahfirah, Titis Fatarina
    Usman, Berto
    Kurniawati, Herni
    Kurnianti, Destria
    [J]. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS IN SOCIETY, 2023, 23 (07): : 1526 - 1563
  • [32] Impact of Firm Performance on Board Characteristics: Empirical Evidence from India
    Arora, Akshita
    Sharma, Chandan
    [J]. IIM KOZHIKODE SOCIETY & MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2015, 4 (01) : 53 - 70
  • [33] Business group characteristics and firm operating performance: evidence from Chile
    Farias, Pablo
    [J]. ACADEMIA-REVISTA LATINOAMERICANA DE ADMINISTRACION, 2014, 27 (02): : 226 - 235
  • [34] Board characteristics, state ownership and firm performance: evidence from Vietnam
    Vu, Kelly Anh
    Pratoomsuwan, Thanyawee
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGERIAL AND FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING, 2019, 11 (02) : 167 - 186
  • [35] The effect of political connections on firm performance: evidence from Egypt
    Eissa, Aref M.
    Eliwa, Yasser
    [J]. ASIAN REVIEW OF ACCOUNTING, 2021, 29 (03) : 362 - 382
  • [36] Environmental, Social, Governance and Firm Performance in Developing Countries: Evidence from Southeast Asian
    Makhdalena
    Zulvina, Desi
    Zulvina, Yani
    Amelia, Rizky Windar
    Wicaksono, Aditya Pandu
    [J]. ETIKONOMI, 2023, 22 (01): : 65 - 78
  • [37] Cross-listing, firm-specific information, and corporate governance: Evidence from Chinese A-shares and H-shares
    Li, Shan
    Brockman, Paul
    Zurbruegg, Ralf
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2015, 32 : 347 - 362
  • [38] Slack resources, firm performance, and the institutional context: Evidence from privately held European firms
    Vanacker, Tom
    Collewaert, Veroniek
    Zahra, Shaker A.
    [J]. STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2017, 38 (06) : 1305 - 1326
  • [39] Impact of CEO characteristics on firm performance: evidence from China listed firms
    Liu, Caiyun
    Jiang, Hui
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2020, 27 (14) : 1 - 5
  • [40] Audit Committee Characteristics and Firm Performance: Evidence from the Insurance Sector in Bahrain
    Qeshta, Mohammed Helmy
    Abu Alsoud, Ghassan F.
    Hezabr, Abdulqawi A.
    Ali, Basel J. A.
    Oudat, Mohammad Salem
    [J]. REVISTA GEINTEC-GESTAO INOVACAO E TECNOLOGIAS, 2021, 11 (02): : 1666 - 1680