Costly signals can facilitate cooperation and punishment in the prisoner?s dilemma

被引:0
作者
Guan, Kaixuan [1 ]
Chen, Yuyou [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Zheng, Wanjun [2 ]
Zeng, Lulu [2 ]
Ye, Hang [2 ]
机构
[1] Ind & Commercial Bank China, Postdoctoral Res Ctr, Beijing 100140, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Econ, Ctr Econ Behav & Decis Making CEBD, Hangzhou 310018, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Sci & Dev, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
关键词
Cooperation; Punishment; Evolutionary game theory; Costly signaling theory; The prisoner?s dilemma; SOCIAL ATTRACTIVENESS; EVOLUTION; RECIPROCITY; SELECTION; EMERGENCE; PROMOTES; FREEDOM;
D O I
10.1016/j.physa.2022.127997
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
Costly signal is regarded as one of the mechanisms to explain the emergence of cooperation. Both the cost of cooperation and the cost of punishment can be seen as expensive cost signals. Previous research has used costly signaling theory to explain the establishment of cooperation and punishment in public goods game. However, punishment is less likely to emerge stably in the prisoner's dilemma, and the punisher cannot have additional information to identify and punish the defector. Therefore, it is particularly important to further study whether the expensive cost signal in the prisoner's dilemma can promote the emergence of cooperation and punishment. We distinguish between costly punishing signals and costly cooperative signals in this paper to look at the rule that turns payoff into fitness. The findings reveal that, without punishment, if the costly signal is weak and the cost of cooperation is not too high compared to the benefit of cooperation, cooperation is a better choice than defection. With punishment, if there is a small amount of noise in the costly signaling mechanism and punishment is considered a more expensive signal than cooperation, punishment is a better strategy. (c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Asymmetric population promotes and jeopardizes cooperation in spatial prisoner's dilemma game
    Sharma, Gopal
    He, Zhixue
    Shen, Chen
    Tanimoto, Jun
    CHAOS SOLITONS & FRACTALS, 2024, 187
  • [42] Phase transitions to cooperation in the prisoner's dilemma
    Helbing, Dirk
    Lozano, Sergi
    PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2010, 81 (05):
  • [43] Effects of punishment in a mobile population playing the prisoner's dilemma game
    Amor, Daniel R.
    Fort, Joaquim
    PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2011, 84 (06):
  • [44] CONTRITION DOES NOT ENSURE COOPERATION IN THE ITERATED PRISONER'S DILEMMA
    Hilbe, Christian
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIFURCATION AND CHAOS, 2009, 19 (11): : 3877 - 3885
  • [45] Revisiting institutional punishment in the N-person prisoner's dilemma
    Ishikawa, Bianca Y. S.
    Fontanari, Jose F.
    THEORY IN BIOSCIENCES, 2025, 144 (01) : 1 - 17
  • [46] Clans and Cooperation in the Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma
    Julstrom, Bryant A.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE FOURTEENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION COMPANION (GECCO'12), 2012, : 1463 - 1464
  • [47] Communication and cooperation in Prisoner's Dilemma games
    Bahel, Eric
    Ball, Sheryl
    Sarangi, Sudipta
    GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 2022, 133 : 126 - 137
  • [48] Historical payoff promotes cooperation in the prisoner's dilemma game
    Deng, Zhenghong
    Ma, Chunmiao
    Mao, Xudong
    Wang, Shenglan
    Niu, Zhenxi
    Gao, Li
    CHAOS SOLITONS & FRACTALS, 2017, 104 : 1 - 5
  • [49] Community structure inhibits cooperation in the spatial prisoner's dilemma
    Wu, Jianshe
    Hou, Yanqiao
    Jiao, Licheng
    Li, Huijie
    PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2014, 412 : 169 - 179
  • [50] How do the joint effects of aspiration and social influence promote cooperation in the prisoner's dilemma game?
    Liu, Chao
    Wang, Hexin
    Dai, Yu
    FRONTIERS IN PHYSICS, 2023, 11