Costly signals can facilitate cooperation and punishment in the prisoner?s dilemma

被引:0
作者
Guan, Kaixuan [1 ]
Chen, Yuyou [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Zheng, Wanjun [2 ]
Zeng, Lulu [2 ]
Ye, Hang [2 ]
机构
[1] Ind & Commercial Bank China, Postdoctoral Res Ctr, Beijing 100140, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Econ, Ctr Econ Behav & Decis Making CEBD, Hangzhou 310018, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Sci & Dev, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
关键词
Cooperation; Punishment; Evolutionary game theory; Costly signaling theory; The prisoner?s dilemma; SOCIAL ATTRACTIVENESS; EVOLUTION; RECIPROCITY; SELECTION; EMERGENCE; PROMOTES; FREEDOM;
D O I
10.1016/j.physa.2022.127997
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
Costly signal is regarded as one of the mechanisms to explain the emergence of cooperation. Both the cost of cooperation and the cost of punishment can be seen as expensive cost signals. Previous research has used costly signaling theory to explain the establishment of cooperation and punishment in public goods game. However, punishment is less likely to emerge stably in the prisoner's dilemma, and the punisher cannot have additional information to identify and punish the defector. Therefore, it is particularly important to further study whether the expensive cost signal in the prisoner's dilemma can promote the emergence of cooperation and punishment. We distinguish between costly punishing signals and costly cooperative signals in this paper to look at the rule that turns payoff into fitness. The findings reveal that, without punishment, if the costly signal is weak and the cost of cooperation is not too high compared to the benefit of cooperation, cooperation is a better choice than defection. With punishment, if there is a small amount of noise in the costly signaling mechanism and punishment is considered a more expensive signal than cooperation, punishment is a better strategy. (c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cooperation in stochastic games: a prisoner's dilemma experiment
    Kloosterman, Andrew
    EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS, 2020, 23 (02) : 447 - 467
  • [32] Risk consideration and cooperation in the iterated prisoner's dilemma
    Zeng, Weijun
    Li, Minqiang
    Chen, Fuzan
    Nan, Guofang
    SOFT COMPUTING, 2016, 20 (02) : 567 - 587
  • [33] Donation of richer individual can support cooperation in spatial voluntary prisoner's dilemma game
    Mao, Deming
    Niu, Zhenxi
    CHAOS SOLITONS & FRACTALS, 2018, 108 : 66 - 70
  • [34] The excuse principle can maintain cooperation through forgivable defection in the Prisoner's Dilemma game
    Krams, Indrikis
    Kokko, Hanna
    Vrublevska, Jolanta
    Abolins-Abols, Mikus
    Krama, Tatjana
    Rantala, Markus J.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2013, 280 (1766)
  • [35] Heterogeneity reproductive ability promotes cooperation in spatial prisoner's dilemma game
    Wang, Qiuling
    Ren, Xiaobin
    Gao, Bo
    Wang, Jiaqian
    CHAOS SOLITONS & FRACTALS, 2020, 134
  • [36] Payoff-related migration enhances cooperation in the prisoner's dilemma game
    Cheng, Hongyan
    Dai, Qionglin
    Li, Haihong
    Zhu, Yun
    Zhang, Mei
    Yang, Junzhong
    NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2011, 13
  • [37] Individual heterogeneity and costly punishment: a volunteer's dilemma
    Przepiorka, Wojtek
    Diekmann, Andreas
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2013, 280 (1759)
  • [38] Partner Choice Cooperation in Prisoner's Dilemma
    Wang, Qi
    Xu, Zhaojin
    Zhang, Lianzhong
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY, 2017, 71 (12) : 861 - 865
  • [39] Cooperation in the Prisoner's Dilemma Game Based on the Second-Best Decision
    Ohdaira, Tetsushi
    Terano, Takao
    JASSS-THE JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL SOCIETIES AND SOCIAL SIMULATION, 2009, 12 (04): : A106 - A129
  • [40] The role of emotional expression in the evolution of cooperation in spatial prisoner's dilemma games
    Chen, Wei
    Wang, Huafeng
    Sheng, Yukun
    CHAOS SOLITONS & FRACTALS, 2025, 192