The nature of mathematical explanation

被引:9
作者
Cellucci, Carlo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Roma La Sapienza, Dept Philosoph & Epistemol Studies, Rome, Italy
来源
STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE | 2008年 / 39卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.shpsa.2008.03.006
中图分类号
N09 [自然科学史]; B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ; 010108 ; 060207 ; 060305 ; 0712 ;
摘要
Although in the past three decades interest in mathematical explanation revived, recent literature on the subject seems to neglect the strict connection between explanation and discovery. In this paper I sketch an alternative approach that takes such connection into account. My approach is a revised version of one originally considered by Descartes. The main difference is that my approach is in terms of the analytic method, which is a method of discovery prior to axiomatized mathematics, whereas Descartes's approach is in terms of the analytic-synthetic method, which is a heuristic pattern in already axiomatized mathematics. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:202 / 210
页数:9
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], RAGIONI LOGICA
[2]  
Balacheff N., 1987, Educational Studies, V18, P147, DOI 10.1007/BF00314724
[3]  
Cellucci C., 2007, FILOSOFIA MATEMATICA
[4]  
Cellucci C, 2006, DEMONSTRATIVE NONDEM, P207
[5]  
Cellucci C., 2006, 18 UNCONVENTIONAL ES, P17
[6]  
CELLUCCI C, 2002, FILOSOFIA MATERNATIC
[7]  
CELLUCCI C, 2005, MATH REASONING HEURI, P137
[8]  
Dawson J. W., 2006, Philosophia Mathematica, V14, P269
[9]  
Hafner J, 2005, SYNTH LIBR, V327, P215
[10]  
Hanson NR, 1958, PATTERNS DISCOVERY I