A review of multi-criteria decision-making methods for bioenergy systems

被引:140
作者
Scott, James A. [1 ]
Ho, William [1 ]
Dey, Prasanta K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Aston Univ, Aston Business Sch, Operat & Informat Management Grp, Birmingham B4 7ET, W Midlands, England
关键词
Bioenergy; Multi-criteria; Multi-attribute; Decision making; RENEWABLE ENERGY; SUPPLY CHAIN; SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT; OPTIMIZATION MODEL; LOGISTICS ISSUES; POWER-GENERATION; BIOMASS; SCENARIOS; TECHNOLOGIES; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2012.03.074
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Bioenergy schemes are multi-faceted and complex by nature, with many available raw material supplies and technical options and a diverse set of stakeholders holding a raft of conflicting opinions. To develop and operate a successful scheme there are many requirements that should be considered and satisfied. This paper provides a review of those academic works attempting to deal with problems arising within the bioenergy sector using multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods. These methods are particularly suitable to bioenergy given its multi-faceted nature but could be equally relevant to other energy conversion technologies. Related articles appearing in the international journals from 2000 to 2010 are gathered and analysed so that the following two questions can be answered. (i) Which methods are the most popular? (ii) Which problems attract the most attention? The review finds that optimisation methods are most popular with methods choosing between few alternatives being used in 44% of reviewed papers and methods choosing between many alternatives being used in 28%. The most popular application area was to technology selection with 27% of reviewed papers followed by policy decisions with 18%. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:146 / 156
页数:11
相关论文
共 81 条
[31]   Spatial analysis of residential fuelwood supply and demand patterns in Mexico using the WISDOM approach [J].
Ghilardi, Adrian ;
Guerrero, Gabriela ;
Masera, Omar .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2007, 31 (07) :475-491
[32]   A GIS-based methodology for highlighting fuelwood supply/demand imbalances at the local level: A case study for Central Mexico [J].
Ghilardi, Adrian ;
Guerrero, Gabriela ;
Masera, Omar .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2009, 33 (6-7) :957-972
[33]   Assessing the sustainability of biofuels: A logic-based model [J].
Gnansounou, Edgard .
ENERGY, 2011, 36 (04) :2089-2096
[34]   Supply chain and logistics issues of bio-energy production [J].
Gold, Stefan ;
Seuring, Stefan .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2011, 19 (01) :32-42
[35]   Renewable energy projects: structuring a multi-criteria group decision-making framework [J].
Haralambopoulos, DA ;
Polatidis, H .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2003, 28 (06) :961-973
[36]   Renewable technologies for rural electrification in Colombia: a multiple objective approach [J].
Herran, Diego Silva ;
Nakata, Toshihiko .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY SECTOR MANAGEMENT, 2008, 2 (01) :139-154
[37]   Multistage optimization of the supply chains of biofuels [J].
Huang, Yongxi ;
Chen, Chien-Wei ;
Fan, Yueyue .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART E-LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION REVIEW, 2010, 46 (06) :820-830
[38]  
Iakovou E, 2010, WASTE MANAGEMENT NEW
[39]   The potential demand for bioenergy in residential heating applications (bio-heat) in the UK based on a market segment analysis [J].
Jablonski, S. ;
Pantaleo, A. ;
Bauen, A. ;
Pearson, P. ;
Panoutsou, C. ;
Slade, R. .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2008, 32 (07) :635-653
[40]   A review of energy models [J].
Jebaraj, S. ;
Iniyan, S. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2006, 10 (04) :281-311