Site- and ground motion-dependent nonlinear effects in seismological model predictions

被引:28
作者
Assimaki, Dominic [1 ]
Li, Wei [1 ]
机构
[1] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Atlanta, GA 30318 USA
关键词
1994 NORTHRIDGE EARTHQUAKE; SPECTRAL RATIO; RESPONSE ESTIMATION; SEISMIC MOTION; DOWNHOLE ARRAY; CALIFORNIA; JAPAN; WEAK; AMPLIFICATION; LIQUEFACTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.06.013
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
We investigate the empirical relationship between site response nonlinearity, soil properties, and ground motion characteristics, as a first step to enable efficient integration of nonlinear analyses in broadband ground motion simulations. For this purpose, we use 24 downhole array sites with detailed geotechnical information and subject the profiles to broadband ground motion synthetics. We quantify the extent of soil nonlinearity in site-specific response analyses by estimating the divergence between linear and nonlinear ground surface predictions. We show that the parameters controlling the nonlinear response are V(S30) (weighted averaged shear wave velocity in the top 30 m of the soil profile), the site amplification at the fundamental frequency (Amp), the peak ground acceleration (PGA), and the frequency index (FI), a quantitative measure we define to characterize how well the incident motion can "see" the near-surface soil layers. Using the synthetic results, we quantitatively describe the error introduced in ground motion predictions when nonlinear effects are not accounted for, and show that the error is both site and ground motion dependent. Our study indicates that to characterize the susceptibility of a soil profile to nonlinear effects, V(S30) should be complemented with measures of the soil-rock impedance contrast, as well as measures of the ground motion intensity and frequency content. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 151
页数:9
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Aguirre J, 1997, B SEISMOL SOC AM, V87, P1244
[2]  
Anderson D, 2003, LAB TESTING NONLINEA, VI
[3]  
Anderson D, 2003, LAB TESTING NONLINEA, VII
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1970, Soil moduli and damping factors for dynamic response analyses
[5]   Quantifying nonlinearity susceptibility via site-response modeling uncertainty at three sites in the Los Angeles basin [J].
Assimaki, Dominic ;
Li, Wei ;
Steidl, Jamison ;
Schmedes, Jan .
BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2008, 98 (05) :2364-2390
[6]  
BARD PY, 2009, EOS T AGU S, V90
[7]  
Bardet J.P., 2000, EERA COMPUTER PROGRA
[8]  
Beresnev IA, 1998, B SEISMOL SOC AM, V88, P1402
[9]  
Boore D.M., 1997, B SEISMOL SOC AM, V87, P237
[10]   Ground-motion prediction equations for the average horizontal component of PGA, PGV, and 5%-damped PSA at spectral periods between 0.01 s and 10.0 s [J].
Boore, David M. ;
Atkinson, Gail M. .
EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2008, 24 (01) :99-138