Estimating Aboveground Net Primary Production in Grasslands: A Comparison of Nondestructive Methods

被引:31
作者
Byrne, Kerry M. [1 ]
Lauenroth, William K. [2 ]
Adler, Peter B. [3 ,4 ]
Byrne, Christine M. [5 ]
机构
[1] Colorado State Univ, Grad Degree Program Ecol, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[2] Univ Wyoming, Dept Bot, Laramie, WY 82071 USA
[3] Utah State Univ, Dept Wildand Resources, Logan, UT 84322 USA
[4] Utah State Univ, Ctr Ecol, Logan, UT 84322 USA
[5] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Environm Sci Policy & Management, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
cost optimization; double sampling; handheld radiometer; mixed grass prairie; point frame; shortgrass steppe; PLANT BIOMASS; CANOPY REFLECTANCE; INTERCEPT METHOD; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; TRANSPIRATION; PRAIRIE;
D O I
10.2111/REM-D-10-00145.1
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Aboveground net primary production (ANPP) is an important ecosystem property that is affected by environmental variability. ANPP in grasslands is typically measured by clipping peak live plant material. However, this method is time intensive (and therefore expensive), making it difficult to capture spatial and temporal variability. Additionally, it is impractical to use a destructive method to estimate ANPP in long-term, permanent plots. Thus, many double-sampling techniques have been developed to reduce costs and increase sample size. The objective of our study was to assess the accuracy and precision of nondestructive techniques to estimate ANPP as supplements to the traditional method of peak biomass harvest at two grassland sites. We harvested biomass and compared estimates from the same plots to 1) canopy interception using a point frame, 2) green cover estimates derived from a digital camera, and 3) reflectance measurements using a handheld radiometer. We calculated the optimum allocation of sampling effort to direct and indirect methods to minimize sampling cost yet achieve a desired precision. We found that the point frame technique explained the highest proportion of the variability in biomass at both sites (R(2) = 0.91, 0.90). However, our cost-optimization analysis revealed that the radiometer technique, although less accurate (R(2) = 0.38, 0.51), could achieve a desired precision for lower labor costs than the point frame. The radiometer and point frame methods will be a useful tool for grassland ecologists and rangeland managers who desire fast, nondestructive estimates of ANPP.
引用
收藏
页码:498 / 505
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Upwelling Increases Net Primary Production of Corals and Reef-Wide Gross Primary Production Along the Pacific Coast of Costa Rica
    Stuhldreier, Ines
    Sanchez-Noguera, Celeste
    Roth, Florian
    Cortes, Jorge
    Rixen, Tim
    Wild, Christian
    FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2015, 2
  • [32] Vegetation-specific model parameters are not required for estimating gross primary production
    Yuan, Wenping
    Cai, Wenwen
    Liu, Shuguang
    Dong, Wenjie
    Chen, Jiquan
    Arain, M. Altaf
    Blanken, Peter D.
    Cescatti, Alessandro
    Wohlfahrt, Georg
    Georgiadis, Teodoro
    Genesio, Lorenzo
    Gianelle, Damiano
    Grelle, Achim
    Kiely, Gerard
    Knohl, Alexander
    Liu, Dan
    Marek, Michal V.
    Merbold, Lutz
    Montagnani, Leonardo
    Panferov, Oleg
    Peltoniemi, Mikko
    Rambal, Serge
    Raschi, Antonio
    Varlagin, Andrej
    Xia, Jiangzhou
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2014, 292 : 1 - 10
  • [33] Daily variation in net primary production and net calcification in coral reef communities exposed to elevated pCO2
    Comeau, Steeve
    Edmunds, Peter J.
    Lantz, Coulson A.
    Carpenter, Robert C.
    BIOGEOSCIENCES, 2017, 14 (14) : 3549 - 3560
  • [34] Estimating Global Gross Primary Production from Sun-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence Data and Auxiliary Information Using Machine Learning Methods
    Bai, Yu
    Liang, Shunlin
    Yuan, Wenping
    REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 13 (05) : 1 - 22
  • [35] Estimating Peatland Water Table Depth and Net Ecosystem Exchange: A Comparison between Satellite and Airborne Imagery
    Kalacska, Margaret
    Arroyo-Mora, J. Pablo
    Soffer, Raymond J.
    Roulet, Nigel T.
    Moore, Tim R.
    Humphreys, Elyn
    Leblanc, George
    Lucanus, Oliver
    Inamdar, Deep
    REMOTE SENSING, 2018, 10 (05):
  • [36] Socio-ecological predictors of global patterns in human appropriation of net primary production
    Jenkins, David G.
    Erb, Karl-Heinz
    Haberl, Helmut
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2022, 142
  • [37] Gross and net primary production in the global ocean: An ocean color remote sensing perspective
    Westberry, Toby K.
    Silsbe, Greg M.
    Behrenfeld, Michael J.
    EARTH-SCIENCE REVIEWS, 2023, 237
  • [38] Climate sensitivity functions and net primary production: A framework for incorporating climate mean and variability
    Rudgers, Jennifer A.
    Chung, Y. Anny
    Maurer, Gregory E.
    Moore, Douglas I.
    Muldavin, Esteban H.
    Litvak, Marcy E.
    Collins, Scott L.
    ECOLOGY, 2018, 99 (03) : 576 - 582
  • [39] Intercomparison of methods to estimate gross primary production based on CO2 and COS flux measurements
    Kohonen, Kukka-Maaria
    Dewar, Roderick
    Tramontana, Gianluca
    Mauranen, Aleksanteri
    Kolari, Pasi
    Kooijmans, Linda M. J.
    Papale, Dario
    Vesala, Timo
    Mammarella, Ivan
    BIOGEOSCIENCES, 2022, 19 (17) : 4067 - 4088
  • [40] Estimating mangrove forest gross primary production by quantifying environmental stressors in the coastal area
    Zheng, Yuhan
    Takeuchi, Wataru
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)