Prospective Study of Avian Influenza Infection in Backyard Poultry Flocks and Flock Handlers in Wisconsin

被引:11
|
作者
Donahue, James G. [1 ]
Coleman, Laura A. [1 ]
Bender, Jeffrey [2 ]
Kempf, Debra [1 ]
Vandermause, Mary F. [1 ]
McGraw, Paul J. [3 ]
Lauer, Dale C. [4 ]
Belongia, Edward A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Marshfield Clin Res Fdn, Epidemiol Res Ctr ML2, Marshfield, WI 54449 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Coll Vet Med, St Paul, MN 55108 USA
[3] Wisconsin Dept Agr Trade & Consumer Protect, Div Anim Hlth, Madison, WI USA
[4] Board Anim Hlth, Minnesota Poultry Testing Lab, Willmar, MN USA
关键词
Avian influenza; Influenza/epidemiology; Influenza virus A; Poultry; Transmission; A H5N1 INFECTION; VIRUSES; TURKEYS; TRANSMISSION;
D O I
10.1089/vbz.2010.0260
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: The continuing epizootic of H5N1 avian influenza (AI) in Asia and subsequent zoonotic transmission has led to heightened concerns about a pandemic and the demand for improved surveillance of poultry in all sectors, including backyard poultry. We conducted a 15-month prospective study to determine the prevalence of AI in backyard poultry and extent of transmission to flock handlers. Methods: Starting July 2007, registered poultry owners in six counties in central Wisconsin were mailed invitations to participate; household members with poultry exposure were also invited. Premises with < 1000 birds were eligible. Participants completed a baseline interview to characterize poultry exposures. Illness in flocks and flock handlers was monitored using semimonthly telephone interviews and self-report of acute influenza-like symptoms by flock handlers. Participants provided blood at baseline and at the end of the surveillance period for serology and, if ill, nasopharyngeal, eye, and throat swabs for viral testing. Blood was also collected at baseline from a convenience sample of adult poultry. Results: We enrolled 87 flocks and 128 persons who had regular contact with poultry. Influenza-like symptoms were reported by 77 (65%) persons. Swabs were collected from 53 persons at 88 illness episodes. AI was not isolated, but five persons were positive for human influenza. Twenty-one participants (20%) seroconverted to at least one human influenza strain, but there were no seroconversions to AI. Blood samples from all 717 birds tested were seronegative for influenza. Conclusion: Despite limited biosecurity there was no evidence of AI infection in participating backyard flocks or flock handlers.
引用
收藏
页码:1293 / 1297
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Where backyard poultry raisers seek care for sick poultry: implications for avian influenza prevention in Bangladesh
    Nadia Ali Rimi
    Rebeca Sultana
    Kazi Ishtiak-Ahmed
    Najmul Haider
    Eduardo Azziz-Baumgartner
    Nazmun Nahar
    Stephen P. Luby
    BMC Public Health, 18
  • [22] Serosurvey of Avian Influenza Viruses (H5, H7, and H9) and Associated Risk Factors in Backyard Poultry Flocks of Lahore District, Pakistan
    Chaudhry, Mamoona
    Bin Rashid, Hamad
    Thrusfield, Michael
    Eisler, Mark C.
    Welburn, Susan C.
    FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2021, 8
  • [23] Seroprevalence of Avian Influenza Viruses in Asymptomatic Backyard Poultry Birds in District Multan, Pakistan
    Navid, Muhammad Tariq
    Awais, Mian Muhammad
    Anwar, Muhammad Irfan
    Akhtar, Masood
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 2023, 55 (01) : 299 - 305
  • [24] Risk factors for highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) H5N1 infection in backyard chicken farms, Thailand
    Paul, Mathilde
    Wongnarkpet, Sirichai
    Gasqui, Patrick
    Poolkhet, Chaithep
    Thongratsakul, Sukanya
    Ducrot, Christian
    Roger, Francois
    ACTA TROPICA, 2011, 118 (03) : 209 - 216
  • [25] Estimating the time of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza virus introduction into United States poultry flocks during the 2022/24 epizootic
    Ssematimba, Amos
    Malladi, Sasidhar
    Bonney, Peter J.
    St Charles, Kaitlyn M.
    Hutchinson, Holden C.
    Schoenbaum, Melissa
    Marusak, Rosemary
    Culhane, Marie R.
    Cardona, Carol J.
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (12):
  • [26] Models of highly pathogenic avian influenza epidemics in commercial poultry flocks in Nigeria and Ghana
    Sky T. K. Pelletier
    Chris Rorres
    Peter C. Macko
    Sarah Peters
    Gary Smith
    Tropical Animal Health and Production, 2012, 44 : 1681 - 1687
  • [27] A flock-tailored early warning system for low pathogenic avian influenza (LPAI) in commercial egg laying flocks
    Beltran-Alcrudo, Daniel
    Carpenter, Tim E.
    Cardona, Carol
    PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2009, 92 (04) : 324 - 332
  • [28] Evaluating the risk of avian influenza introduction and spread among poultry exhibition flocks in Australia
    Hernandez-Jover, M.
    Schemann, K.
    East, I. J.
    Toribio, J. -A. L. M. L.
    PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2015, 118 (01) : 128 - 141
  • [29] Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of avian influenza among backyard poultry breeders in Fayoum Governorate, Egypt
    Radwan, Ghada Nasr
    Wahid, Wafaa Yousif Abdel
    El-Derwy, Doaa
    El-Rabat, Maha
    JOURNAL OF THE EGYPTIAN PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOCIATION, 2011, 86 (5-6): : 104 - 110
  • [30] Rate of introduction of a low pathogenic avian influenza virus infection in different poultry production sectors in the Netherlands
    Gonzales, Jose L.
    Stegeman, Jan A.
    Koch, Guus
    de Wit, Sjaak J.
    Elbers, Armin R. W.
    INFLUENZA AND OTHER RESPIRATORY VIRUSES, 2013, 7 (01) : 6 - 10