Numerical Investigation on Blast Response of Cold-Formed Steel Framing Protected with Functionally Graded Composite Material

被引:6
作者
Ali, Elias [1 ]
Althoey, Fadi [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama Huntsville, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Huntsville, AL 35805 USA
[2] Najran Univ, Coll Engn, Dept Civil Engn, Najran 1988, Saudi Arabia
关键词
cold-formed steel; blast; standoff distance; TNT; functionally graded material; composite;
D O I
10.3390/buildings12020118
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This paper presents a numerical simulation on the blast response of cold-formed steel (CFS) structural framing system protected with a functionally graded composite material (FGM) panel. The steel frame consists of four CFS studs, which were protected by 12.5 mm thick gypsum, aluminum composite, and FGM composite materials on both sides. The numerical simulation was performed using ABAQUS on a 1.8 m x 2.4 m, overall wall panel exposed to air blast on one side. A 1.0 kg TNT explosive charge placed at four standoff distances (R) of 1.0 m, 1.5 m, 2.0 m, and 2.5 m from the framing were investigated. The FGM board was modeled using a stepwise material variation using the power-law material function. Deformation and failure modes of the studs, as well as the protective materials, were compared to the same framing system but with different protective materials, including conventional gypsum boards and aluminum composite panels. Based on the observation from the analysis and computational simulation, the proposed protective composite material (FGM) resulted in a smaller deformation at peak overpressure at a given standoff distance (R) and local failure modes on studs. The same frame system with gypsum and aluminum panel exhibited excessive deformation as well as an early collapse of the CFS studs. This observation can lead to an alternative material solution in blast-resistant design.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   History of Cold-Formed Steel Framing Used as a Backing for Brick Veneer [J].
Clark, Charles B., Jr. ;
Fried, Cortney L. ;
Bryja, James .
MASONRY 2018, 2018, 1612 :158-180
[22]   Design of Composite Cold-Formed Steel Flooring Systems [J].
Kyvelou, Pinelopi ;
Gardner, Leroy ;
Nethercot, David A. .
STRUCTURES, 2017, 12 :242-252
[23]   Experimental investigation of cold-formed stainless steel columns [J].
Young, B ;
Liu, YH .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 2003, 129 (02) :169-176
[24]   Numerical investigation of the strength and design of cold-formed steel built-up columns [J].
Phan, Dang Khoa ;
Rasmussen, Kim J. R. ;
Schafer, Benjamin W. .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH, 2022, 193
[25]   Numerical Investigation on Cold-Formed Steel Lipped Channel Columns with Intermediate Web Stiffeners [J].
Manikandan P. ;
Arun N. .
Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series A, 2016, 97 (01) :1-7
[26]   Experimental and numerical investigation of cold-formed steel double angle members under compression [J].
Maia, W. F. ;
Vieira, L. C. M., Jr. ;
Schafer, B. W. ;
Malite, M. .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH, 2016, 121 :398-412
[27]   Numerical Investigation of Composite Behavior and Strength of Rectangular Concrete-Filled Cold-Formed Steel Tubular Stub Columns [J].
Wang, Liping ;
An, Yanan ;
Ding, Faxing ;
Kuang, Yachuan ;
Ma, Qing ;
Tan, Sui ;
Zhang, Weizhen ;
Zhao, Pengzhou ;
Ren, Enhui .
MATERIALS, 2021, 14 (20)
[28]   Blast Testing of Cold-Formed Steel-Stud Wall Panels [J].
Whelan, Matthew J. ;
Ralston, Adam D. ;
Weggel, David C. .
JOURNAL OF PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTED FACILITIES, 2016, 30 (02)
[29]   System Reliability Benefits of Repetitive Framing in Cold-Formed Steel Floor Systems [J].
Smith, Brooks H. ;
Chatterjee, Aritra ;
Arwade, Sanjay R. ;
Moen, Cristopher D. ;
Schafer, Benjamin W. .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 144 (06)
[30]   Feasibility of developing composite action between concrete and cold-formed steel beam [J].
S.O.Bamaga ;
M.Md.Tahir ;
T.C.Tan ;
S.Mohammad ;
N.Yahya ;
A.L.Saleh ;
M.Mustaffar ;
M.H.Osman ;
A.B.A.Rahman .
Journal of Central South University, 2013, 20 (12) :3689-3696