Life cycle assessment of distillation columns manufacturing

被引:16
作者
Brondani, Michel [1 ]
de Oliveira, Jivago Schumacher [1 ]
Mayer, Flavio Dias [1 ]
Hoffmann, Ronaldo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Santa Maria, Dept Chem Engn, BR-97105900 Santa Maria, RS, Brazil
关键词
Environmental analysis; Tower internals; Tray; Packing; Cleaner production; BIODIESEL PRODUCTION; ETHANOL-PRODUCTION; STAINLESS-STEEL; ENERGY-BALANCE; TRAY; EFFICIENCY; SIEVE; LCA; PACKING; OIL;
D O I
10.1007/s10668-019-00459-5
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In the last decades, the environmental impacts are considered in the decision making of processes and equipment. Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a widely used environmental methodology for environmental impacts assessment of projects and products. This study used the LCA for environmental evaluation of two types of distillation column manufacturing: a conventional tray column and a hybrid-packed and tray-column. Eco-Indicator 99 and CML 2 methods were used for inputs conversion in environmental impacts and to compare the distillation columns. Eco-Indicator 99 results showed that the use of electricity and the stainless steel are the inputs with greater environmental impact potential in both columns. Use of stainless steel presented an environmental impact percentage of 38.87% in tray column and 35.91% in hybrid column. Use of electricity apport an environmental impact percentage of 35.68% and 34.25% in tray and hybrid column, respectively. Results obtained by Eco-Indicator 99 and CML 2 methods showed that the hybrid column manufacturing presented a mean environmental impact reduction of 8.7% and 8.92%, respectively, in relation to tray column. CML 2 results showed that hybrid column manufacturing decreases the total CO(2)emissions in 180.70 kg CO(2)eq, resulting in a reduction of 15% when compared with the tray column manufacturing. Construction of the hybrid column is an alternative for environmental impact mitigation.
引用
收藏
页码:5925 / 5945
页数:21
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]   A sustainable method for optimizing product design with trade-off between life cycle cost and environmental impact [J].
Ameli, Mariam ;
Mansour, Saeed ;
Ahmadi-Javid, Amir .
ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 19 (06) :2443-2456
[2]  
[Anonymous], ESTUDO DESEMPENHO EN
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, ISO 14040 2006 ENV M
[4]  
[Anonymous], AVALIACAO CICLO VIDA
[5]  
Azpilicueta E., TABLE EMBODIED ENERG
[6]   SMALL-SCALE ETHANOL-PRODUCTION FROM CORN - TECHNOLOGY, ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND ECONOMICS [J].
BENGTSON, HH .
ENERGY IN AGRICULTURE, 1983, 2 (03) :197-217
[7]   Participatory emergy synthesis of integrated food and biofuel production: A case study from Brazil [J].
Daniel A. Bergquist ;
Otávio Cavalett ;
Torbjörn Rydberg .
Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2012, 14 (2) :167-182
[9]   Life cycle assessment as an analytical tool in strategic environmental assessment. Lessons learned from a case study on municipal energy planning in Sweden [J].
Bjorklund, Anna .
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2012, 32 (01) :82-87
[10]  
Caldas J. N., 2003, Internos de torres: pratos & recheios