The Ecosystem Services and Green Infrastructure: A Systematic Review and the Gap of Economic Valuation

被引:16
作者
Ersoy Mirici, Merve [1 ]
机构
[1] Bursa Tech Univ, Dept Landscape Architecture, Fac Forestry, TR-16310 Bursa, Turkey
关键词
green infrastructure; ecosystem services; economic valuation; VOSviewer; bibliometric analysis; CHALLENGES; NETWORKS; ENHANCE; VALUES; ENERGY; AREA;
D O I
10.3390/su14010517
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study was conducted to determine the trends at the intersection of studies made on green infrastructure and ecosystem services, which have frequently become preferred in establishing urban-green space relationships in global research. Green-related concepts have frequently been used from past to present in order to neutralise the increasing pressures on urban dynamics resulting from rapid urbanisation. Green corridor, green belt, green structure, and green finger/hand concepts have been used to provide recreational opportunities, protect nature, and keep urban sprawl under control. For the last decade, however, in addition to the traditional green concepts, green infrastructure (GI) and ecosystem services (ES) have been preferred in contemporary urban planning, as they enable the integration of the ecological concerns of the landscape and the socio-political perspective. The aim of this study is to detect the trends of the green infrastructure and ecosystem services association, and to reveal these trends in the common area with the bibliometric mapping method. The economic concept and its analysing use at the intersection of green infrastructure and ecosystem services were explored with VOSviewer using the Scopus(R) database. Furthermore, the number of documents, which initially began with around 39,719 studies, was reduced by filtering through systematic reviews, to only three documents that met the economic valuation criteria. In this way, a lack of economic analyses, creating a serious research gap within the framework of green infrastructure and ecosystem services, was quantitatively determined.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 82 条
[1]   From Green Belts to Green Infrastructure INTRODUCTION [J].
Amati, Marco ;
Taylor, Laura .
PLANNING PRACTICE AND RESEARCH, 2010, 25 (02) :143-155
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, [No title captured]
[3]  
Austin G., 2014, GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE, DOI [10.4324/9781315856780, DOI 10.4324/9781315856780]
[4]   Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies [J].
Baas, Jeroen ;
Schotten, Michiel ;
Plume, Andrew ;
Cote, Gregoire ;
Karimi, Reza .
QUANTITATIVE SCIENCE STUDIES, 2020, 1 (01) :377-386
[5]  
Benedict M., 2006, GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE
[6]   Economic Value of Parks via Human Mental Health: An Analytical Framework [J].
Buckley, Ralf C. ;
Brough, Paula .
FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2017, 5
[7]   Green Infrastructures and Grand Environmental Challenges: A Review of Research Trends by Keyword [J].
Caparros-Martinez, Jose Luis ;
Milan-Garcia, Juan ;
Martinez-Vazquez, Rosa Maria ;
de Pablo Valenciano, Jaime .
AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2021, 11 (04)
[8]   Biodiversity and ecosystem services in urban green infrastructure planning: A case study from the metropolitan area of Rome (Italy) [J].
Capotorti, Giulia ;
Orti, Marta Maria Alos ;
Copiz, Riccardo ;
Fusaro, Lina ;
Mollo, Barbara ;
Salvatori, Elisabetta ;
Zavattero, Laura .
URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING, 2019, 37 :87-96
[9]   Regional climate change and local urbanization effects on weather variables in Southeast China [J].
Chen, Ji ;
Li, Qinglan ;
Niu, Jun ;
Sun, Liqun .
STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2011, 25 (04) :555-565
[10]   Benefits of the ecosystem services provided by urban green infrastructures: Differences between perception and measurements [J].
Chen, Siyu ;
Wang, Yafei ;
Ni, Zhuobiao ;
Zhang, Xibei ;
Xia, Beicheng .
URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING, 2020, 54