Circuitry Linking the Catabolite Repression and Csr Global Regulatory Systems of Escherichia coli

被引:39
作者
Pannuri, Archana [1 ]
Vakulskas, Christopher A. [1 ,5 ]
Zere, Tesfalem [1 ,6 ]
McGibbon, Louise C. [2 ]
Edwards, Adrianne N. [3 ]
Georgellis, Dimitris [4 ]
Babitzke, Paul [2 ]
Romeo, Tony [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Inst Food & Agr Sci, Dept Microbiol & Cell Sci, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[2] Penn State Univ, Dept Biochem & Mol Biol, Ctr RNA Mol Biol, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[3] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Dept Microbiol & Immunol, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[4] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Inst Fisiol Celular, Dept Genet Mol, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
[5] Integrated DNA Technol, Dept Mol Genet, Coralville, IA USA
[6] Univ Florida, Coll Dent, Dept Oral Biol, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
关键词
RNA-BINDING PROTEIN; CAMP-RECEPTOR PROTEIN; MESSENGER-RNA; GENE-EXPRESSION; GLYCOGEN BIOSYNTHESIS; BIOFILM FORMATION; POSTTRANSCRIPTIONAL REGULATION; PHOSPHOTRANSFERASE SYSTEM; TRANSLATIONAL REPRESSION; FLHDC EXPRESSION;
D O I
10.1128/JB.00454-16
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Cyclic AMP (cAMP) and the cAMP receptor protein (cAMP-CRP) and CsrA are the principal regulators of the catabolite repression and carbon storage global regulatory systems, respectively. cAMP-CRP controls the transcription of genes for carbohydrate metabolism and other processes in response to carbon nutritional status, while CsrA binds to diverse mRNAs and regulates translation, RNA stability, and/or transcription elongation. CsrA also binds to the regulatory small RNAs (sRNAs) CsrB and CsrC, which antagonize its activity. The BarA-UvrY two-component signal transduction system (TCS) directly activates csrB and csrC (csrB/C) transcription, while CsrA does so indirectly. We show that cAMP-CRP inhibits csrB/C transcription without negatively regulating phosphorylated UvrY (P-UvrY) or CsrA levels. A crp deletion caused an elevation in CsrB/C levels in the stationary phase of growth and increased the expression of csrB-lacZ and csrC-lacZ transcriptional fusions, although modest stimulation of CsrB/C turnover by the crp deletion partially masked the former effects. DNase I footprinting and other studies demonstrated that cAMP-CRP bound specifically to three sites located upstream from the csrC promoter, two of which overlapped the P-UvrY binding site. These two proteins competed for binding at the overlapping sites. In vitro transcription-translation experiments confirmed direct repression of csrC-lacZ expression by cAMP-CRP. In contrast, cAMP-CRP effects on csrB transcription may be mediated indirectly, as it bound nonspecifically to csrB DNA. In the reciprocal direction, CsrA bound to crp mRNA with high affinity and specificity and yet exhibited only modest, conditional effects on expression. Our findings are incorporated into an emerging model for the response of Csr circuitry to carbon nutritional status. IMPORTANCE Csr (Rsm) noncoding small RNAs (sRNAs) CsrB and CsrC of Escherichia coli use molecular mimicry to sequester the RNA binding protein CsrA (RsmA) away from lower-affinity mRNA targets, thus eliciting major shifts in the bacterial lifestyle. CsrB/C transcription and turnover are activated by carbon metabolism products (e.g., formate and acetate) and by a preferred carbon source (glucose), respectively. We show that cAMP-CRP, a mediator of classical catabolite repression, inhibits csrC transcription by binding to the upstream region of this gene and also inhibits csrB transcription, apparently indirectly. We propose that glucose availability activates pathways for both synthesis and turnover of CsrB/C, thus shaping the dynamics of global signaling in response to the nutritional environment by poising CsrB/C sRNA levels for rapid response.
引用
收藏
页码:3000 / 3015
页数:16
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]   csrR, a Paralog and Direct Target of CsrA, Promotes Legionella pneumophila Resilience in Water [J].
Abbott, Zachary D. ;
Yakhnin, Helen ;
Babitzke, Paul ;
Swanson, Michele S. .
MBIO, 2015, 6 (03)
[2]   Rapid and robust signaling in the CsrA cascade via RNA-protein interactions and feedback regulation [J].
Adamson, David Nellinger ;
Lim, Han N. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2013, 110 (32) :13120-13125
[3]   Regulation of Translation Initiation by RNA Binding Proteins [J].
Babitzke, Paul ;
Baker, Carol S. ;
Romeo, Tony .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF MICROBIOLOGY, 2009, 63 :27-44
[4]   CsrA inhibits translation initiation of Escherichia coli hfq by binding to a single site overlapping the Shine-Dalgarno sequence [J].
Baker, Carol S. ;
Eoery, Lel A. ;
Yakhnin, Helen ;
Mercante, Jeffrey ;
Romeo, Tony ;
Babitzke, Paul .
JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLOGY, 2007, 189 (15) :5472-5481
[5]   CsrA regulates glycogen biosynthesis by preventing translation of glgC in Escherichia coli [J].
Baker, CS ;
Morozov, I ;
Suzuki, K ;
Romeo, T ;
Babitzke, P .
MOLECULAR MICROBIOLOGY, 2002, 44 (06) :1599-1610
[6]   The Base-Pairing RNA Spot 42 Participates in a Multioutput Feedforward Loop to Help Enact Catabolite Repression in Escherichia coli [J].
Beisel, Chase L. ;
Storz, Gisela .
MOLECULAR CELL, 2011, 41 (03) :286-297
[7]   Honing the message: post-transcriptional and post-translational control in attaching and effacing pathogens [J].
Bhatt, Shantanu ;
Romeo, Tony ;
Kalman, Daniel .
TRENDS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2011, 19 (05) :217-224
[8]   The RNA Binding Protein CsrA Is a Pleiotropic Regulator of the Locus of Enterocyte Effacement Pathogenicity Island of Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli [J].
Bhatt, Shantanu ;
Edwards, Adrianne Nehrling ;
Nguyen, Hang Thi Thu ;
Merlin, Didier ;
Romeo, Tony ;
Kalman, Daniel .
INFECTION AND IMMUNITY, 2009, 77 (09) :3552-3568
[9]   Effects of the Global Regulator CsrA on the BarA/UvrY Two-Component Signaling System [J].
Camacho, Martha I. ;
Alvarez, Adrian F. ;
Gonzalez Chavez, Ricardo ;
Romeo, Tony ;
Merino, Enrique ;
Georgellis, Dimitris .
JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLOGY, 2015, 197 (05) :983-991
[10]   The Crp-Activated Small Noncoding Regulatory RNA CyaR (RyeE) Links Nutritional Status to Group Behavior [J].
De Lay, Nicholas ;
Gottesman, Susan .
JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLOGY, 2009, 191 (02) :461-476