Modified laparoscopic high uterosacral ligament suspension for treatment of apical prolapse: A feasibility study

被引:1
作者
Wang, Jing [1 ]
Xu, Xiaomin [1 ]
Xu, Jingui [1 ]
机构
[1] Wenzhou Med Univ, Dept Gynecol, Quzhou Affiliated Hosp, Quzhou Peoples Hosp, Quzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
apical prolapse; modified laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension; pelvic organ prolapse; uterine preservation; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; OUTCOMES; MESH;
D O I
10.1111/jog.15393
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of modified laparoscopic high uterosacral ligament suspension (LHUS) in women with apical prolapse who require uterine preservation. Methods This retrospective feasibility study analyzed the demographic characteristics, procedure, and 3-year follow-up data of 23 women who underwent modified LHUS at our institution. Outcome measures included clinical and anatomical cure. Patient satisfaction was measured by the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I). The improvement on quality of life was evaluated by pelvic floor distress inventory-short form 20 (PFDI-20). Results The operation time was 50 +/- 17 min, the blood loss was 100 ml (50-300 ml), and the postoperative hospital stay was 3.5 days (3-6 days). At a median follow-up time of 4.3 years (3-6 years), the clinical cure rate was 91.6% and the anatomical cure rate was 87.0%. The values of Aa, Ba, C, and D points were significantly higher than those observed before operation (p < 0.05). According to PGI-I, 20 patients were satisfied, and the overall subjective satisfaction rate was 87%. The scores of PFDI-20 after operation were significantly lower than those recorded before operation (p < 0.05). Conclusion Modified LHUS has the advantages of short operation time, fast postoperative recovery, low 3-year recurrence rate, and high patient satisfaction in women with apical prolapse who require uterine preservation, which is worthy of clinical promotion.
引用
收藏
页码:2918 / 2925
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for exteriorized pelvic organ prolapse: Mid-term functional results
    Andre, B.
    Jourdain, O.
    Guerby, P.
    Vidal, F.
    Leonard, F.
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE FERTILITE & SENOLOGIE, 2018, 46 (01): : 7 - 13
  • [2] Uterus-Sparing Surgery: Outcomes of Transvaginal Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy
    Aserlind, Alexandra
    Garcia, Alexandra N.
    Medina, Carlos A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 28 (01) : 100 - 106
  • [3] Comparison of 2 Transvaginal Surgical Approaches and Perioperative Behavioral Therapy for Apical Vaginal Prolapse The OPTIMAL Randomized Trial
    Barber, Matthew D.
    Brubaker, Linda
    Burgio, Kathryn L.
    Richter, Holly E.
    Nygaard, Ingrid
    Weidner, Alison C.
    Menefee, Shawn A.
    Lukacz, Emily S.
    Norton, Peggy
    Schaffer, Joseph
    Nguyen, John N.
    Borello-France, Diane
    Goode, Patricia S.
    Jakus-Waldman, Sharon
    Spino, Cathie
    Warren, Lauren Klein
    Gantz, Marie G.
    Meikle, Susan F.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2014, 311 (10): : 1023 - 1034
  • [4] Vaginal Apical Pain After Sacrocolpopexy in Absence of Vaginal Mesh Erosion: A Case Series
    Buechel, Megan
    Tarr, Megan E.
    Walters, Mark D.
    [J]. FEMALE PELVIC MEDICINE AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2016, 22 (01): : E8 - E10
  • [5] Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension versus vaginal colposuspension using the Uphold Lite™ mesh system: clinical outcome and patient satisfaction
    Chill, Henry H.
    Gutman-Ido, Einat
    Navon, Ido
    Reuveni-Salzman, Adi
    Haj-Yahya, Rani
    Shveiky, David
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2021, 32 (06) : 1513 - 1518
  • [6] Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial
    Detollenaere, Renee J.
    den Boon, Jan
    Stekelenburg, Jelle
    IntHout, Joanna
    Vierhout, Mark E.
    Kluivers, Kirsten B.
    van Eijndhoven, Hugo W. F.
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 351
  • [7] Urogynecological surgical mesh implants: New trends in materials, manufacturing and therapeutic approaches
    Farmer, Zara-Louise
    Dominguez-Robles, Juan
    Mancinelli, Caterina
    Larraneta, Eneko
    Lamprou, Dimitrios A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS, 2020, 585
  • [8] Reliability and validity of the Tigrigna version of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-Short Form 20 (PFDI-20) and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire-7 (PFIQ-7)
    Goba, Gelila K.
    Legesse, Awol Yeman
    Zelelow, Yibrah Berhe
    Gebreselassie, Mussie Alemayehu
    Rogers, Rebecca G.
    Kenton, Kimberly S.
    Mueller, Margaret G.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2019, 30 (01) : 65 - 70
  • [9] Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy vs Total Vaginal Hysterectomy with Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Anterior and Apical Prolapse: Surgical Outcome and Patient Satisfaction
    Haj-Yahya, Rani
    Chill, Henry H.
    Levin, Gabriel
    Reuveni-Salzman, Adi
    Shveiky, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 27 (01) : 88 - 93
  • [10] Mesh-Free Laparoscopic High Uterosacral Ligament Suspension during Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Uterine Prolapse
    Jan, Haider
    Ghai, Vishalli
    Doumouchtsis, Stergios K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 25 (06) : 952 - 953