On the relationship between the apparent diffusion coefficient and extravascular extracellular volume fraction in human breast cancer

被引:32
作者
Arlinghaus, Lori R. [1 ,2 ]
Li, Xia [1 ,2 ]
Rahman, A. Ridwan [3 ]
Welch, E. Brian [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Lei [5 ]
Gore, John C. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,6 ]
Yankeelov, Thomas E. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Inst Imaging Sci, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
[2] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Radiol & Radiol Sci, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
[3] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Phys & Astron, Nashville, TN 37235 USA
[4] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Nashville, TN 37235 USA
[5] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Biostat, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
[6] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Mol Physiol & Biophys, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
[7] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Canc Biol, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Apparent diffusion coefficient; Extravascular extracellular volume fraction; Human breast cancer; CONTRAST-ENHANCED MRI; TRANSCYTOLEMMAL WATER EXCHANGE; NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; DCE-MRI; XENOGRAFTS; TUMORS; MODEL; PERMEABILITY; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.mri.2011.02.004
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
MRI techniques have been developed that can noninvasively probe the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of water via diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI). These methods have found much application in cancer where it is often found that the ADC within tumors is inversely correlated with tumor cell density, so that an increase in ADC in response to therapy can be interpreted as an imaging biomarker of positive treatment response. Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) methods have also been developed and can noninvasively report on the extravascular extracellular volume fraction of tissues (denoted by v(e)). By conventional reasoning, the ADC should therefore also be directly proportional to v(e). Here we report measurements of both ADC and v(e) obtained from breast cancer patients at both 1.5 and 3.0 T. The 1.5-T data were acquired as part of normal standard of care, while the 3.0-T data were obtained from a dedicated research protocol. We found no statistically significant correlation between ADC and v(e) for the 1.5- or 3.0-T patient sets on either a voxel-by-voxel or a region-of-interest (ROI) basis. These data, combined with similar results from other disease sites in the literature, may indicate that the conventional interpretation of either ADC, v(e) or their relationship is not sufficient to explain experimental findings. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:630 / 638
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Effects of cell volume fraction changes on apparent diffusion in human cells [J].
Anderson, AW ;
Xie, J ;
Pizzonia, J ;
Bronen, RA ;
Spencer, DD ;
Gore, JC .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2000, 18 (06) :689-695
[2]   Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Cancer Biomarker: Consensus and Recommendations [J].
不详 .
NEOPLASIA, 2009, 11 (02) :102-125
[3]   Comparison of tumor histology to dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging-based physiological estimates [J].
Aref, Michael ;
Chaudhari, Amir R. ;
Bailey, Keith L. ;
Aref, Susanne ;
Wiener, Erik C. .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2008, 26 (09) :1279-1293
[4]   Monitoring breast cancer response to neloadjuvant systemic chemotherapy using parametric contrast-enhanced MRI: A pilot study [J].
Chou, Chen-Pin ;
Wu, Ming-Ting ;
Chang, Hong-Tai ;
Lo, Yu-Shin ;
Pan, Huay-Ben ;
Degani, Hadassa ;
Furman-Haran, Edna .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2007, 14 (05) :561-573
[5]   High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging of disparities in the transcapillary transfer rates in orthotopically inoculated invasive breast tumors [J].
Dadiani, M ;
Margalit, R ;
Sela, N ;
Degani, H .
CANCER RESEARCH, 2004, 64 (09) :3155-3161
[6]   Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Tumors: Preclinical Validation of Parametric Images [J].
Egeland, Tormod A. M. ;
Simonsen, Trude G. ;
Gaustad, Jon-Vidar ;
Gulliksrud, Kristine ;
Ellingsen, Christine ;
Rofstad, Einar K. .
RADIATION RESEARCH, 2009, 172 (03) :339-347
[7]   Diffusion-weighted Imaging Improves the Diagnostic Accuracy of Conventional 3.0-T Breast MR Imaging [J].
El Khouli, Riham H. ;
Jacobs, Michael A. ;
Mezban, Sarah D. ;
Huang, Peng ;
Kamel, Ihab R. ;
Macura, Katarzyna J. ;
Bluemke, David A. .
RADIOLOGY, 2010, 256 (01) :64-73
[8]   Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of human cervical carcinoma xenografts: Pharmacokinetic analysis and correlation to tumor histomorphology [J].
Ellingsen, Christine ;
Egeland, Tormod A. M. ;
Galappathi, Kanthi ;
Rofstad, Einar K. .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2010, 97 (02) :217-224
[9]   Characterization of tissue structure at varying length scales using temporal diffusion spectroscopy [J].
Gore, John C. ;
Xu, Junzhong ;
Colvin, Daniel C. ;
Yankeelov, Thomas E. ;
Parsons, Edward C. ;
Does, Mark D. .
NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, 2010, 23 (07) :745-756
[10]   Early Therapy Evaluation of Combined Anti-Death Receptor 5 Antibody and Gemcitabine in Orthotopic Pancreatic Tumor Xenografts by Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging [J].
Kim, Hyunki ;
Morgan, Desiree E. ;
Buchsbaum, Donald J. ;
Zeng, Huadong ;
Grizzle, William E. ;
Warram, Jason M. ;
Stockard, Cecil R. ;
McNally, Lacey R. ;
Long, Joshua W. ;
Sellers, Jeffrey C. ;
Forero, Andres ;
Zinn, Kurt R. .
CANCER RESEARCH, 2008, 68 (20) :8369-8376