Carbon Footprint Management: A Pathway Toward Smart Emission Abatement

被引:53
作者
Pourakbari-Kasmaei, Mahdi [1 ]
Lehtonen, Matti [1 ]
Contreras, Javier [2 ]
Sanches Mantovani, Jose Roberto [3 ]
机构
[1] Aalto Univ, Dept Elect Engn, Espoo 02150, Finland
[2] Univ Castilla La Mancha, ETS Ingenieros Ind, E-13071 Ciudad Real, Spain
[3] Sao Paulo State Univ, Dept Elect Engn, BR-15385000 Ilha Solteira, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Carbon abatement; carbon footprint allocation; demand side management; power tracing; tax exemption; DISTRIBUTION-SYSTEM; POWER-GENERATION; FLOW; ELECTRICITY; DEMAND; WIND; ALLOCATION; CAPTURE; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1109/TII.2019.2922394
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
There is an increasing concern about controlling and reducing carbon emissions in power systems. In this regard, researchers have focused on managing emissions on the generation side, which is the main source of emissions. Considering emission limits on the generation side result in an increase in locational marginal prices that negatively affects social welfare. However, carbon emissions are a by-product of electricity generation that is used to satisfy the demands on the consumer side. Consequently, demand-side emission control may not be achieved if only the generation is taken into account. In order to fill this existing gap, in this paper, a demand-side management approach aiming at carbon footprint control is proposed. First, the carbon footprint is allocated among the consumers using an improved proportional sharing theorem method. Each consumer learns about their real-time carbon footprint, excess carbon footprint, and the incurred surcharge tax. Then, demands are adjusted via a proper adjustment procedure. This provides enough information for consumers where demand management may result in carbon footprint and demand reductions as well as the exemption of incurred taxes. Profit analysis for both generation and demand sides is carried out to show the effectiveness of the proposed framework using two illustrative case studies. The results obtained, compared with existing policies such as carbon cap, cap-and-trade, and carbon tax, prove the fairness and the advantages of the proposed model for both the demand and the generation sides.
引用
收藏
页码:935 / 948
页数:14
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Adam D., 2008, BRITAINS WORST POLLU
[2]   Optimal Active-Reactive Power Dispatch Under Competition via Bilevel Programming [J].
Almeida, K. C. ;
Senna, F. S. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2011, 26 (04) :2345-2354
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2016, CUST MARK PRAGM FRAM
[5]   Where to place the saving obligation: Energy end-users or suppliers? [J].
Bertoldi, Paolo ;
Labanca, Nicola ;
Rezessy, Silvia ;
Steuwer, Sibyl ;
Oikonomou, Vlasis .
ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 63 :328-337
[6]   Allocation of transmission supplementary charge to real and reactive loads [J].
Bialek, J .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 1998, 13 (03) :749-754
[7]   Tracing the flow of electricity [J].
Bialek, J .
IEE PROCEEDINGS-GENERATION TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION, 1996, 143 (04) :313-320
[8]  
[Calderon GCED GCED], 2014, GLOBAL COMMISSION EC
[9]  
Cheng Y., 2019, IEEE T SMART GRID, V10
[10]  
Crippen D. L., 2011, CARBON EMISSIONS