Third-line or fourth-line chemotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer patients with relatively good performance status

被引:14
作者
Chen, Yuh-Min [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Shih, Jen-Fu [1 ]
Fan, Wen-Chien [4 ]
Wu, Chieh-Hung [1 ]
Chou, Kun-Ta [1 ]
Tsai, Chun-Ming [1 ]
Lee, Yu-Chin [1 ]
Perng, Reury-Perng [1 ]
Whang-Peng, Jacqueline [3 ]
机构
[1] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Chest Dept, Taipei 112, Taiwan
[2] Natl Yang Ming Univ Sch Med, Dept Med, Taipei, Taiwan
[3] Taipei Med Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, CECR, Taipei, Taiwan
[4] Chutung Vet Hosp, Dept Med, Chutung, Hsinchu County, Taiwan
关键词
Adenocarcinoma; Chemotherapy; Docetaxel; Non-small-cell lung cancer; Pemetrexed; PHASE-III TRIAL; DOCETAXEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcma.2011.03.005
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Our aim here was to explore treatment efficacy of pemetrexed and docetaxel in non-small-cell lung cancer patients who had failed previous chemotherapy and epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed clinical data of our non-small-cell lung cancer patients who received third- or fourth-line chemotherapy with pemetrexed or docetaxel in our institution from January 2006 to December 2009. Results: One hundred and twenty-three patients received treatment, including 85 patients with pemetrexed treatment and 38 patients with docetaxel treatment. There was no difference in tumor response rate and toxicity profiles when using pemetrexed as third- or fourth-line treatment, neither was there difference in docetaxel treatment of third- versus fourth-line treatment. There was also no difference between docetaxel and pemetrexed in response rate and control rate when they were used as fourth-line treatment. However, docetaxel used in fourth-line treatment had higher incidence of neutropenia and more frequent need of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support compared with pemetrexed in fourth-line treatment. Median progression-free survivals (PFSs) were 2.6 months and 3.8 months when using pemetrexed as third- and fourth-line treatment, respectively (p = 0.417). Median PFSs were 3.8 months and 4.8 months when using docetaxel as third- and fourth-line treatment, respectively (p = 0.882). There was also no difference in PFS between pemetrexed and docetaxel, both in third- and fourth-line treatment. Median survivals were 13.4, 12.2, 13.2, and 13 months for pemetrexed in third-line, fourth-line, and docetaxel in third-line and fourth-line treatment, respectively. Conclusion: This retrospective study of pemetrexed and docetaxel showed relatively safe toxicity profile, reasonable response rate, and long survival when used as third- and fourth-line chemotherapy. Thus, it is reasonable to give good performance status patients third- and fourth-line chemotherapy. A phase III randomized trial is needed for better clarification of these issues. Copyright (C) 2011 Elsevier Taiwan LLC and the Chinese Medical Association. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 214
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Third-Line Chemotherapy in Small-Cell Lung Cancer: An International Analysis
    Simos, Demetrios
    Sajjady, Golmehr
    Sergi, Melissa
    Liew, Mun Sem
    Califano, Raffaele
    Ho, Cheryl
    Leighl, Natasha
    White, Shane
    Summers, Yvonne
    Petrcich, William
    Wheatley-Price, Paul
    [J]. CLINICAL LUNG CANCER, 2014, 15 (02) : 110 - 118
  • [22] Efficacy and Toxicity of Pemetrexed as a Third-line Treatment for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
    Sun, Jong-Mu
    Lee, Keun-Wook
    Kim, Jee Hyun
    Kim, Yu Jung
    Yoon, Ho Il
    Lee, Jae-Ho
    Lee, Choon-Taek
    Lee, Jong Seok
    [J]. JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 39 (01) : 27 - 32
  • [23] Efficacy and safety of Endostar (recombinant human endostatin hormone) combined with docetaxel as second-or third-line therapy for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer
    Ji, Dongmei
    Wang, Jialei
    Yu, Hui
    Wu, Xianghua
    Wang, Huijie
    Li, Wenhua
    Sun, Si
    Zhang, Jian
    Chang, Jianhua
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2017, 10 (01): : 843 - 852
  • [24] Anlotinib as a third-line therapy in patients with refractory advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a multicentre, randomised phase II trial (ALTER0302)
    Han, Baohui
    Li, Kai
    Zhao, Yizhuo
    Li, Baolan
    Cheng, Ying
    Zhou, Jianying
    Lu, You
    Shi, Yuankai
    Wang, Zhehai
    Jiang, Liyan
    Luo, Yi
    Zhang, Yiping
    Huang, Cheng
    Li, Qiang
    Wu, Guoming
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2018, 118 (05) : 654 - 661
  • [25] ARCTIC: durvalumab with or without tremelimumab as third-line or later treatment of metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer
    Planchard, D.
    Reinmuth, N.
    Orlov, S.
    Fischer, J. R.
    Sugawara, S.
    Mandziuk, S.
    Marquez-Medina, D.
    Novello, S.
    Takeda, Y.
    Soo, R.
    Park, K.
    McCleod, M.
    Geater, S. L.
    Powell, M.
    May, R.
    Scheuring, U.
    Stockman, P.
    Kowalski, D.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2020, 31 (05) : 609 - 618
  • [26] Maintenance chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer
    Kim, Young Hak
    Mishima, Michiaki
    [J]. CANCER TREATMENT REVIEWS, 2011, 37 (07) : 505 - 510
  • [27] Second- and third-line treatments in non-small cell lung cancer
    Kumar A.
    Wakelee H.
    [J]. Current Treatment Options in Oncology, 2006, 7 (1) : 37 - 49
  • [28] Second-line erlotinib for non-small-cell lung cancer
    Lorusso, Vito
    Cinieri, Saverio
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2012, 13 (04) : E141 - E142
  • [29] Comparison of gefitinib and erlotinib efficacies as third-line therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer
    Shao, Yu-Yun
    Shau, Wen-Yi
    Lin, Zhong-Zhe
    Chen, Ho-Min
    Kuo, Raymond
    Yang, James Chih-Hsin
    Lai, Mei-Shu
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2013, 49 (01) : 106 - 114
  • [30] Treatment paradigms for patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: first-, second-, and third-line
    Leighl, N. B.
    [J]. CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2012, 19 : S52 - S58