Intraocular pressure difference in goldmann applanation tonometry versus Perkins hand-held applanation tonometry in overweight patients

被引:51
|
作者
dos Santos, MG
Makk, S
Berghold, A
Eckhardt, M
Haas, A
机构
[1] Graz Univ, Dept Ophthalmol, A-8036 Graz, Austria
[2] Graz Univ, Inst Med Informat Stat & Documentat, A-8036 Graz, Austria
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0161-6420(98)91226-X
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Objective: To analyze the increase in intraocular pressure (IOP) caused by anatomic and physiologic factors in overweight patients when using Goldmann applanation tonometry. Design: A prospective cohort study. Participants: Seventy average-weight individuals who had no difficulties with IOP measurements at the slit lamp and 12 obese patients with suspected glaucoma who could position the head at the slit lamp only with great effort participated. Intervention: The authors compared IOP values between slit-lamp-mounted Goldmann applanation tonometry and Perkins hand-held tonometry. Main Outcome Measure: The difference in Goldmann and Perkins IOP measurements was examined. Results: In the group of obese patients, the mean IOP was 20.9 +/- 2.28 mmHg (mean +/- standard deviation; range, 18-26 mmHg) for the right eye and 21.4 +/- 3.16 mmHg (range, 16-28 mmHg) for the left eye when determined by Goldmann tonometry and 16.3 +/- 2.39 mmHg (range, 13-20 mmHg) for the right eye and 16.3 +/- 2.42 (range, 11-19 mmHg) for the left eye when determined by Perkins tonometry. The mean decrease was 4.5 +/- 1.3 mmHg (range, 3-7 mmHg) for the right eye and 4.9 +/- 1.9 mmHg (range, 2-9 mmHg) for the left eye. In the control group, the mean difference between the two types of tonometers for the right eye was 0.34 +/- 0.69 mmHg and for the left eye was 0.33 +/- 0.82 mmHg, Patients who had a falsely elevated IOP on Goldmann tonometry had an average body mass index of 34 +/- 3.82 (range, 28.5-41.9); most were female (5:1 ratio). Conclusion: The authors believe simultaneous breath-holding and thorax compression, with subsequent increase in venous pressure, may be a causative factor for transitory elevations of IOP, Perkins tonometry in obese patients may help avoid a false diagnosis of glaucoma caused by transitory elevations in IOP.
引用
收藏
页码:2260 / 2263
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Agreement of patient-measured intraocular pressure using rebound tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) in glaucoma patients
    Tan, Shaoying
    Yu, Marco
    Baig, Nafees
    Hansapinyo, Linda
    Tham, Clement C.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2017, 7
  • [42] Agreement of patient-measured intraocular pressure using rebound tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) in glaucoma patients
    Shaoying Tan
    Marco Yu
    Nafees Baig
    Linda Hansapinyo
    Clement C. Tham
    Scientific Reports, 7
  • [43] Applanation resonance tonometry for intraocular pressure in humans
    Hallberg, P
    Lindén, C
    Lindahl, OA
    Bäcklund, T
    Eklund, A
    PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2004, 25 (04) : 1053 - 1065
  • [44] Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry for measuring intraocular pressure in normal tension glaucomatous eyes
    Wang, Jing Grace
    Latina, Mark A.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2017, 58 (08)
  • [45] Comparison of Goldmann Applanation Tonometry and Dynamic Contour Tonometry in the Measurement of Intraocular Pressure in Eyes with Different Corneal Thicknesses
    Roszkowska, A. M.
    De Grazia, L.
    Cirone, M.
    Ferreri, G.
    OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2009, 223 (04) : 244 - 249
  • [46] Measuring Intraocular Pressure After Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segment Implantation With Rebound Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry
    Arribas-Pardo, Paula
    Mendez-Hernandez, Carmen
    Cuina-Sardina, Ricardo
    Fernandez-Perez, Cristina
    Diaz-Valle, David
    Garcia-Feijoo, Julian
    CORNEA, 2015, 34 (05) : 516 - 520
  • [47] Intraocular pressure elevation after vitrectomy-Goldmann applanation tonometry measures lower intraocular pressure than dynamic contour tonometry
    Baeurle, Sebastian
    Viestenz, Anja
    Seitz, Berthold
    Viestenz, Arne
    OPHTHALMOLOGIE, 2022, 119 : S71 - S76
  • [48] Intraocular pressure elevation after vitrectomy-Goldmann applanation tonometry measures lower intraocular pressure than dynamic contour tonometry
    Baeurle, Sebastian
    Viestenz, Anja
    Seitz, Berthold
    Viestenz, Arne
    OPHTHALMOLOGE, 2022, 119 (SUPPL 1): : 71 - 76
  • [49] Tonometry in corneal edema after cataract surgery: dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry
    Herr, Anne
    Remky, Andreas
    Hirsch, Thalia
    Rennings, Corinna
    Plange, Niklas
    CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2013, 7 : 815 - 819
  • [50] Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry: Difference of Intraocular Pressure Values Between Eyes with and without Glaucomatous Damage in Thin Corneas
    Akkan, J. C. Umurhan
    Akkan, F.
    Akcay, B. I. Sezgin
    Ayintap, E.
    Tuncer, K.
    KLINISCHE MONATSBLATTER FUR AUGENHEILKUNDE, 2015, 232 (10) : 1190 - 1197