Intraocular pressure difference in goldmann applanation tonometry versus Perkins hand-held applanation tonometry in overweight patients

被引:51
|
作者
dos Santos, MG
Makk, S
Berghold, A
Eckhardt, M
Haas, A
机构
[1] Graz Univ, Dept Ophthalmol, A-8036 Graz, Austria
[2] Graz Univ, Inst Med Informat Stat & Documentat, A-8036 Graz, Austria
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0161-6420(98)91226-X
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Objective: To analyze the increase in intraocular pressure (IOP) caused by anatomic and physiologic factors in overweight patients when using Goldmann applanation tonometry. Design: A prospective cohort study. Participants: Seventy average-weight individuals who had no difficulties with IOP measurements at the slit lamp and 12 obese patients with suspected glaucoma who could position the head at the slit lamp only with great effort participated. Intervention: The authors compared IOP values between slit-lamp-mounted Goldmann applanation tonometry and Perkins hand-held tonometry. Main Outcome Measure: The difference in Goldmann and Perkins IOP measurements was examined. Results: In the group of obese patients, the mean IOP was 20.9 +/- 2.28 mmHg (mean +/- standard deviation; range, 18-26 mmHg) for the right eye and 21.4 +/- 3.16 mmHg (range, 16-28 mmHg) for the left eye when determined by Goldmann tonometry and 16.3 +/- 2.39 mmHg (range, 13-20 mmHg) for the right eye and 16.3 +/- 2.42 (range, 11-19 mmHg) for the left eye when determined by Perkins tonometry. The mean decrease was 4.5 +/- 1.3 mmHg (range, 3-7 mmHg) for the right eye and 4.9 +/- 1.9 mmHg (range, 2-9 mmHg) for the left eye. In the control group, the mean difference between the two types of tonometers for the right eye was 0.34 +/- 0.69 mmHg and for the left eye was 0.33 +/- 0.82 mmHg, Patients who had a falsely elevated IOP on Goldmann tonometry had an average body mass index of 34 +/- 3.82 (range, 28.5-41.9); most were female (5:1 ratio). Conclusion: The authors believe simultaneous breath-holding and thorax compression, with subsequent increase in venous pressure, may be a causative factor for transitory elevations of IOP, Perkins tonometry in obese patients may help avoid a false diagnosis of glaucoma caused by transitory elevations in IOP.
引用
收藏
页码:2260 / 2263
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] GOLDMANN APPLANATION VERSUS HAND-APPLANATION AND SCHIOTZ INDENTATION TONOMETRY
    KRIEGLSTEIN, GK
    WALLER, WK
    ALBRECHT VON GRAEFES ARCHIV FUR KLINISCHE UND EXPERIMENTELLE OPHTHALMOLOGIE, 1975, 194 (01): : 11 - 16
  • [2] Comparison of intraocular pressure measurement by Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry
    DeBry, PW
    Krishna, R
    Willoughby, TL
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2003, 44 : U372 - U372
  • [3] Postural Change in Intraocular Pressure and Agreement between Goldmann Applanation, Tonopen, and Perkins Tonometry
    Aziz, Kanza
    Fu, Jing
    Varadaraj, Varshini
    Kretz, Alyssa Marie
    Moroi, Sayoko
    Friedman, David S.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2019, 60 (09)
  • [4] Intraocular pressure measurement - Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry
    Schneider, E
    Grehn, F
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2006, 15 (01) : 2 - 6
  • [5] Clinical differences in rebound tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry measurements of intraocular pressure in adult patients
    Chiu, Zelia
    Collins, Camille
    van der Straaten, David
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 50 (08): : 923 - 924
  • [6] Untreated 24-h intraocular pressures measured with Goldmann applanation tonometry vs nighttime supine pressures with Perkins applanation tonometry
    Quaranta, L.
    Konstas, A. G. P.
    Rossetti, L.
    Garcia-Feijoo, J.
    O'Brien, C.
    Nasr, M. B.
    Fogagnolo, P.
    Demos, C. M.
    Stewart, J. A.
    Stewart, W. C.
    EYE, 2010, 24 (07) : 1252 - 1258
  • [7] Ocular response analyzer versus Goldmann applanation tonometry for intraocular pressure measurements
    Martinez-de-la-Casa, Jose M.
    Garcia-Feijoo, Julian
    Fernandez-Vidal, Ana
    Mendez-Hernandez, Carmen
    Garcia-Sanchez, Julian
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2006, 47 (10) : 4410 - 4414
  • [8] Untreated 24-h intraocular pressures measured with Goldmann applanation tonometry vs nighttime supine pressures with Perkins applanation tonometry
    L Quaranta
    A G P Konstas
    L Rossetti
    J Garcia-Feijoo
    C O'Brien
    M B Nasr
    P Fogagnolo
    C M Demos
    J A Stewart
    W C Stewart
    Eye, 2010, 24 : 1252 - 1258
  • [9] Dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry: correlation with intracameral assessment of intraocular pressure
    Riva, Ivano
    Quaranta, Luciano
    Russo, Andrea
    Katsanos, Andreas
    Rulli, Eliana
    Floriani, Irene
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2012, 22 (01) : 55 - 62
  • [10] Comparison of intraocular pressure measured by Pascal dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry
    J Y F Ku
    H V Danesh-Meyer
    J P Craig
    G D Gamble
    C N J McGhee
    Eye, 2006, 20 : 191 - 198