Endoscopic balloon dilation for treatment of sleeve gastrectomy stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:24
|
作者
Chang, Steven H. [1 ]
Popov, Violeta B. [1 ]
Thompson, Christopher C. [2 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Div Gastroenterol, Langone Med Ctr, New York, NY USA
[2] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Gastroenterol, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
BARIATRIC SURGERY; GASTRIC STENOSIS; MORBID-OBESITY; SYMPTOMATIC STENOSIS; MANAGEMENT OPTIONS; COMPLICATIONS; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.gie.2019.11.034
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Aims: Gastric stenosis is a rare but potentially serious adverse event after sleeve gastrectomy. Despite current suboptimal treatments, endoscopic balloon dilatation (EBD) has emerged as a safe and efficacious approach. The purpose of this study is to assess the overall success of EBD for sleeve gastrectomy stenosis (SGS) as first-line therapy. Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Database were searched from inception to July 2018. The primary outcome was defined as overall success rate of clinical resolution of SGS obstructive symptoms with EBD, expressed as pooled event rate and 95% confidence interval (CI). The secondary predefined outcomes include EBD success rates for SGS in the proximal (cardia) location or mid-distal location (antrum/incisura), in early SGS (up to 3 months after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy), and late SGS (3 months or longer after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy) and success rate of cases requiring stents or salvage surgery. Results: Eighteen studies encompassing 426 patients were analyzed. The average age and body mass index were 41.7 years and 40.1 kg/m(2), respectively, and the average number of dilations for all cases was 1.8 per person. Overall EBD success rate was 76% (95% CI, .67-.86). EBD success rate in the proximal SGS was 90% (95% CI, 63%-98%), distal SGS was 70% (95% CI, 47%-86%), early SGS within 3 months was 59% (95% CI, 34%-79%), and late SGS after 3 months was 61% (95% CI, 41%-78%). Seventeen percent of patients underwent secondary salvage surgery, with a success rate of 91% (95% CI, 80%-96%). Conclusions: Endoscopic balloon dilation appears to be a safe and effective minimally invasive alternative to surgical revision and should be used as first-line therapy for SGS
引用
收藏
页码:989 / +
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] ENDOSCOPIC BALLOON DILATION FOR TREATMENT OF SLEEVE GASTRECTOMY STENOSIS: A META-ANALYSIS
    Chang, Steven
    Popov, Violeta
    Thompson, Christopher C.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2019, 89 (06) : AB260 - AB261
  • [2] Endoscopic Balloon Dilation for Treating Post-Sleeve Gastrectomy Stenosis: A Meta-Analysis
    Chang, Steven
    Popov, Violeta
    Thompson, Christopher C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2017, 112 : S482 - S483
  • [3] A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Endoscopic Balloon Dilation of Pediatric Subglottic Stenosis
    Lang, Michael
    Brietzke, Scott E.
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2014, 150 (02) : 174 - 179
  • [4] ENDOSCOPIC HYDROSTATIC BALLOON DILATION VERSUS PNEUMATIC DILATION FOR POST-SLEEVE GASTRECTOMY SYMPTOMATIC GASTRIC STENOSIS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS Endoscopic and Percutaneous Interventional Procedures
    Jaruvongvanich, V.
    Beran, A.
    Matar, R.
    Abu Dayyeh, B.
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2019, 29 : 538 - 538
  • [5] SYSTEMATIC TREATMENT OF SLEEVE GASTRECTOMY STENOSIS WITH HYDROSTATIC AND PNEUMATIC BALLOON DILATION IS SAFE AND EFFECTIVE
    Jirapinyo, Pichamol
    Abidi, Wasif M.
    Thompson, Christopher C.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 154 (06) : S1276 - S1276
  • [6] Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty with Comparison to Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy
    Jalal, Md Asif
    Cheng, Qiuye
    Edye, Michael B.
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2020, 30 (07) : 2754 - 2762
  • [7] Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty with Comparison to Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy
    Md Asif Jalal
    Qiuye Cheng
    Michael B. Edye
    Obesity Surgery, 2020, 30 : 2754 - 2762
  • [8] Intragastric Balloon Versus Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty for the Treatment of Obesity: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Shailendra Singh
    Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura
    Ahmad Khan
    Mohammad Bilal
    Monica Chowdhry
    Michele B. Ryan
    Ahmad Najdat Bazarbashi
    Christopher C. Thompson
    Obesity Surgery, 2020, 30 : 3010 - 3029
  • [9] Intragastric Balloon Versus Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty for the Treatment of Obesity: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Singh, Shailendra
    de Moura, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux
    Khan, Ahmad
    Bilal, Mohammad
    Chowdhry, Monica
    Ryan, Michele B.
    Bazarbashi, Ahmad Najdat
    Thompson, Christopher C.
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2020, 30 (08) : 3010 - 3029
  • [10] INTRAGASTRIC BALLOON VERSUS ENDOSCOPIC SLEEVE GASTROPLASTY FOR THE TREATMENT OF OBESITY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Singh, Shailendra
    de Moura, Diogo T.
    Khan, Ahmad
    Bilal, Mohammad
    Chowdhry, Monica
    Bazarbashi, Ahmad Najdat
    Thompson, Christopher C.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2020, 91 (06) : AB217 - AB217