Endoscopic balloon dilation for treatment of sleeve gastrectomy stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:25
|
作者
Chang, Steven H. [1 ]
Popov, Violeta B. [1 ]
Thompson, Christopher C. [2 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Div Gastroenterol, Langone Med Ctr, New York, NY USA
[2] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Gastroenterol, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
BARIATRIC SURGERY; GASTRIC STENOSIS; MORBID-OBESITY; SYMPTOMATIC STENOSIS; MANAGEMENT OPTIONS; COMPLICATIONS; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.gie.2019.11.034
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Aims: Gastric stenosis is a rare but potentially serious adverse event after sleeve gastrectomy. Despite current suboptimal treatments, endoscopic balloon dilatation (EBD) has emerged as a safe and efficacious approach. The purpose of this study is to assess the overall success of EBD for sleeve gastrectomy stenosis (SGS) as first-line therapy. Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Database were searched from inception to July 2018. The primary outcome was defined as overall success rate of clinical resolution of SGS obstructive symptoms with EBD, expressed as pooled event rate and 95% confidence interval (CI). The secondary predefined outcomes include EBD success rates for SGS in the proximal (cardia) location or mid-distal location (antrum/incisura), in early SGS (up to 3 months after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy), and late SGS (3 months or longer after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy) and success rate of cases requiring stents or salvage surgery. Results: Eighteen studies encompassing 426 patients were analyzed. The average age and body mass index were 41.7 years and 40.1 kg/m(2), respectively, and the average number of dilations for all cases was 1.8 per person. Overall EBD success rate was 76% (95% CI, .67-.86). EBD success rate in the proximal SGS was 90% (95% CI, 63%-98%), distal SGS was 70% (95% CI, 47%-86%), early SGS within 3 months was 59% (95% CI, 34%-79%), and late SGS after 3 months was 61% (95% CI, 41%-78%). Seventeen percent of patients underwent secondary salvage surgery, with a success rate of 91% (95% CI, 80%-96%). Conclusions: Endoscopic balloon dilation appears to be a safe and effective minimally invasive alternative to surgical revision and should be used as first-line therapy for SGS
引用
收藏
页码:989 / +
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Endoscopic Balloon Dilation of Pediatric Subglottic Stenosis
    Lang, Michael
    Brietzke, Scott E.
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2014, 150 (02) : 174 - 179
  • [2] Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty with Comparison to Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy
    Jalal, Md Asif
    Cheng, Qiuye
    Edye, Michael B.
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2020, 30 (07) : 2754 - 2762
  • [3] A protocolized approach to endoscopic hydrostatic versus pneumatic balloon dilation therapy for gastric sleeve stenosis: a multicenter study and meta-analysis
    Jaruvongvanich, Veeravich
    Matar, Reem
    Beran, Azizullah
    Maselli, Daniel B.
    Storm, Andrew C.
    Gomez, Victoria
    Vargas, Eric J.
    Kellogg, Todd A.
    McKenzie, Travis J.
    Pannala, Rahul
    Neto, Manoel Galvao
    Texeira, Andre
    Abu Dayyeh, Barham K.
    SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES, 2020, 16 (10) : 1543 - 1553
  • [4] The Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Balloon Dilatation in the Treatment of Functional Post-Sleeve-Gastrectomy Stenosis
    Elsebaey, Mohamed A.
    Enaba, Mohamed Elsayed
    Elashry, Heba
    Elrefaey, Waleed
    Hagag, Rasha Youssef
    Shalaby, Neveen A.
    Aboelnasr, Mohamed Sabry
    Sarhan, Mohamed Elsayed
    Darrag, Omneya Mohamed
    Elsokkary, Assem Mohamed
    Alabd, Mohamed Abd Allah
    El Nakib, Ahmed Mohamed
    Abdulrahim, Abdulrashid Onimisi
    Abo-Amer, Yousry Esam-Eldin
    Mahfouz, Mohammad Shaaban
    Fouad, Amina Mahmoud
    Abd El Latif, Raghda Samir
    Allam, Khaled Asem
    Ismail, Amro Abdelaziz Mohammed
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2024, 60 (05):
  • [5] Outcomes of endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty; how does it compare to laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mohan, Babu P.
    Asokkumar, Ravishankar
    Khan, Shahab R.
    Kotagiri, Rajesh
    Sridharan, Gurusravanan Kutti
    Chandan, Saurabh
    Ravikumar, Naveen P. G.
    Ponnada, Suresh
    Jayaraj, Mahendran
    Adler, Douglas G.
    ENDOSCOPY INTERNATIONAL OPEN, 2020, 8 (04) : E558 - E565
  • [6] Does Omentopexy Make a Difference in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy for Obesity Treatment? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Mohamedahmed, Ali Yasen Y.
    Hamid, Mohammed
    Zaman, Shafquat
    Abdalla, Hashim E.
    Wuheb, Ali Ahmed
    Khan, Amir
    Parmar, Jitesh
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2024, 34 (01) : 218 - 235
  • [7] Reduced Port Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Gutierrez-Ramirez, Lucia
    Morandeira-Rivas, Antonio
    Medina-Benitez, Elisa
    Arias-Arias, Angel
    Moreno-Sanz, Carlos
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2024, 34 (12) : 4519 - 4530
  • [8] Balloon dilation for the treatment of male urethral strictures: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Xiaoyu
    Xu, Chunru
    Ji, Xing
    Zhu, Zhenpeng
    Cai, Tianyu
    Guo, Zhenke
    Lin, Jian
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (02):
  • [9] Effectiveness of sleeve gastrectomy plus fundoplication versus sleeve gastrectomy alone for treatment of patients with severe obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Loo, Jing Hong
    Chue, Koy Min
    Toh, Bin Chet
    Kariyawasam, Gamage Manisha Daminda
    Ong, Lester Wei Lin
    Tan, Jeremy Tian Hui
    Wong, Wai Keong
    Yeung, Baldwin Po Man
    SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES, 2024, 20 (06) : 532 - 543
  • [10] Midterm Outcome of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy in Asians: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Jaruvongvanich, Veeravich
    Wongjarupong, Nicha
    Vantanasiri, Kornpong
    Samakkarnthai, Parinya
    Ungprasert, Patompong
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2020, 30 (04) : 1459 - 1467