The effect of phonetic complexity on the speed of single-word productions in adults who do and do not stutter

被引:3
|
作者
Byrd, Courtney T. [1 ]
Coalson, Geoffrey A. [2 ]
Yang, Jie [1 ]
Moriarty, Kirsten [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, 1 Univ Stn A1100, Austin, TX 78759 USA
[2] Louisiana State Univ, 81 Hatcher Hall, Baton Rouge, LA 70810 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Stuttering; Phonetic complexity; Fluency; Accuracy; Reaction time; SCHOOL-AGED CHILDREN; SYNTACTIC COMPLEXITY; NONWORD REPETITION; PHONOLOGICAL NEIGHBORHOOD; CONVERSATIONAL UTTERANCES; INITIATION TIME; LEXICAL FACTORS; YOUNG-CHILDREN; SPOKEN WORDS; FREQUENCY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcomdis.2017.06.009
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of phonetic complexity as measured by the Word Complexity Measure (WCM) on the speed of single-word production in adults who do (AWS, n = 15) and do not stutter (AWNS, n = 15). Method: Participants were required to name pictures of high versus low phonetic complexity and balanced for lexical properties. Speech reaction time was recorded from initial presentation of the picture to verbal response of participant for each word type. Accuracy and fluency were manually coded for each production. Results: AWS named pictures significantly slower than AWNS, but there were no significant differences observed in response latency when producing word of high versus low phonetic complexity as measured by the WCM. Conclusion: Findings corroborate past research of overall slowed picture naming latencies in AWS, compared to AWNS. Findings conflict with data that suggest that the phonetic complexity of words uniquely compromises the speed of production in AWS. The potential interaction between lexical and phonetic factors on single-word production within each group are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:94 / 105
页数:12
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Phonetic complexity of words immediately following utterance-initial productions in children who stutter
    Coalson, Geoffrey A.
    Byrd, Courtney T.
    JOURNAL OF FLUENCY DISORDERS, 2016, 47 : 56 - 69
  • [2] Adults who stutter do not stutter during private speech
    Jackson, Eric S.
    Miller, Lindsay R.
    Warner, Haley J.
    Yaruss, J. Scott
    JOURNAL OF FLUENCY DISORDERS, 2021, 70
  • [3] The role of selected lexical factors on confrontation naming accuracy, speed, and fluency in adults who do and do not stutter
    Newman, Rochelle S.
    Ratner, Nan Bernstein
    JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2007, 50 (01): : 196 - 213
  • [4] Bimanual task performance: Adults who do and do not stutter
    Werle, Danielle
    Byrd, Courtney
    Gkalitsiou, Zoi
    Eggers, Kurt
    JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS, 2019, 81
  • [5] Differences in implicit motor learning between adults who do and do not stutter
    Hobler, Fiona
    Bitan, Tali
    Tremblay, Luc
    De Nil, Luc
    NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2022, 174
  • [6] Nonword repetition and phoneme elision in adults who do and do not stutter
    Byrd, Courtney T.
    Vallely, Megann
    Anderson, Julie D.
    Sussman, Harvey
    JOURNAL OF FLUENCY DISORDERS, 2012, 37 (03) : 188 - 201
  • [7] Metrical Encoding in Adults Who Do and Do Not Stutter
    Coalson, Geoffrey A.
    Byrd, Courtney T.
    JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2015, 58 (03): : 601 - 621
  • [8] Comparison of different speech tasks among adults who stutter and adults who do not stutter
    Ritto, Ana Paula
    Costa, Julia Biancalana
    Juste, Fabiola Starobole
    Furquim de Andrade, Claudia Regina
    CLINICS, 2016, 71 (03) : 152 - 155
  • [9] Attention networks in multilingual adults who do and who do not stutter
    Aslan, Gizem
    Marinis, Theo
    Eggers, Kurt
    CLINICAL LINGUISTICS & PHONETICS, 2024, 38 (12) : 1169 - 1191
  • [10] Locus of control comparison in adults who stutter and who do not stutter
    Çağdaş Karsan
    R. Sertan Özdemir
    Current Psychology, 2023, 42 : 18660 - 18669