Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of PARP Inhibitors as a Monotherapy for Platinum-Sensitive Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis

被引:9
|
作者
Wang, Hongmei [1 ]
Wu, Meng [1 ]
Liu, Haonan [1 ]
Zhou, Hang [2 ]
Zhao, Yang [1 ]
Geng, Yifan [1 ]
Jiang, Bo [1 ]
Zhang, Kai [1 ]
Zhang, Bo [1 ]
Han, Zhengxiang [1 ]
Du, Xiuping [1 ]
机构
[1] Xuzhou Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp, Dept Oncol, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] First Peoples Hosp Lianyungang, Dept Hematol, Lianyungang, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2021年 / 11卷
关键词
PARP inhibitors; ovarian cancer; monotherapy; maintenance treatment; network meta-analysis; NIRAPARIB MAINTENANCE THERAPY; DOUBLE-BLIND; COMPLETE RESPONSE; SURVIVAL; CHEMOTHERAPY; PACLITAXEL;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2021.785102
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe present COVID-19 pandemic has tended toward normality. To provide convenient, safe, and effective home treatment programs for patients with recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC), the clinical efficacy and safety of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) (including olaparib, niraparib, and rucaparib) monotherapy as a maintenance treatment for platinum-sensitive ROC were systematically evaluated. MethodsNumerous electronic databases were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of PARPi maintenance treatment for ROC that were published before June 2021. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoint was grade 3-4 adverse effects (AEs). After data extraction and the quality evaluation of the included studies, Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed using R software. The ability of each treatment was ranked using the surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) curve. ResultsThe analysis included five studies and 1390 patients. The NMA results demonstrated that compared with the placebo, olaparib and niraparib exhibited significant benefits in the gBRCA-mutated population, and respectively reduced the risk of death by 31% (HR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.53-0.90) and 34% (HR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.44-0.99). Olaparib, niraparib, and rucaparib were all found to be very effective in prolonging PFS in patients with ROC. All three PARPi treatments increased the number of grade 3-4 AEs in patients with ROC as compared with the placebo. ConclusionsOverall, olaparib and niraparib maintenance treatment can significantly prolong the OS of patients with gBRCA mutations. Furthermore, the three investigated PARPi monotherapy maintenance treatments can prolong PFS regardless of BRCA mutation status. Although the incidence of AEs in the treatment groups was found to be significantly higher than that in the placebo group, the patients in the treatment group tolerated the treatment. Home oral PARPi treatment can balance tumor treatment and pandemic prevention and control, and is the most convenient, safe, and effective home treatment method available against the background of the current COVID-19 pandemic. Systematic Review Registrationhttps://inplasy.com/inplasy-2021-6-0033/.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] EFFICACY OF PARP INHIBITORS MAINTENANCE IN OLDER PATIENTS WITH OVARIAN CANCER: A META-ANALYSIS
    Maiorano, B. A.
    Maiorano, M. F. P.
    Ciardiello, D.
    Rodriquenz, M. G.
    Maglione, A.
    Scianname, N.
    Maiello, E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2021, 31 : A103 - A103
  • [42] Efficacy and safety of different angiogenesis inhibitors combined with PARP inhibitors in the treatment of ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Huang, Xuemei
    Luo, Jianxiu
    Gu, Liqin
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2025, 29 (01)
  • [43] Study on the short-term efficacy and safety of bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy for platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer
    Li, Changhui
    Cheng, Wei
    Yu, Shaohui
    Xuan, Jing
    BASIC & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY, 2019, 125 : 195 - 196
  • [44] Efficacy of subsequent chemotherapy regimens in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer following PARP inhibitor progression: a multicenter retrospective study
    Zhao, Yuxi
    Kang, Haili
    Zhao, Hongwei
    Wang, Li
    Duan, Wei
    Wu, Lingying
    Zuo, Jing
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2024, 34 (SUPPL_3) : A76 - A78
  • [45] Parp inhibitors as maintenance treatment in platinum sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer: An updated meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials according to BRCA mutational status
    Tomao, Federica
    Bardhi, Erlisa
    Di Pinto, Anna
    Sassu, Carolina Maria
    Biagioli, Elena
    Petrella, Maria Cristina
    Palaia, Innocenza
    Muzii, Ludovico
    Colombo, Nicoletta
    Panici, Pierluigi Benedetti
    CANCER TREATMENT REVIEWS, 2019, 80
  • [46] PARP INHIBITORS MAINTENANCE THERAPY IN PLATINUM-SENSITIVE RELAPSED OVARIAN CANCER: A COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTRE'S EXPERIENCE
    Moreira, I.
    Ferreira, M.
    Lopes, A. R.
    Savva-Bordalo, J.
    Abreu, M.
    Sousa, S.
    Pereira, D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2021, 31 : A239 - A239
  • [47] Secondary cytoreduction in platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer: An individual patient level meta-analysis
    Gulia, S.
    Kannan, S.
    Ghosh, J.
    Rath, S.
    Maheshwari, A.
    Gupta, S.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2022, 33 : S1507 - S1507
  • [48] Secondary cytoreductive surgery for recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer
    Schorge, John O.
    Wingo, Shana N.
    Bhore, Rafia
    Heffernan, Thomas P.
    Lea, Jayanthi S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2010, 108 (02) : 123 - 127
  • [49] Efficacy and safety of PARP inhibitors as the maintenance therapy in ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis of nine randomized controlled trials
    Shao, Fengping
    Liu, Jun
    Duan, Yaoyun
    Li, Li
    Liu, Liqun
    Zhang, Cai
    He, Shanyang
    BIOSCIENCE REPORTS, 2020, 40
  • [50] Management of platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer: A cost-effectiveness analysis
    Havrilesky, Laura J.
    Secord, Angeles Alvarez
    Kulasingam, Shalini
    Myers, Evan
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2007, 107 (02) : 211 - 218