Effects of supplementation on production of beef cattle grazing tropical pastures in Brazil during the wet and dry seasons: a meta-analysis

A meta-analysis was undertaken to examine the effects of different supplementation strategies on production of beef cattle grazing tropical pastures during the wet and dry seasons in Brazil. The database was built with 132 studies published from 1999 to 2010, which accounted for 6,275 individual animals. The supplements assessed were classified into three groups: energy supplement containing <20% crude protein (CP), protein supplement containing =20% CP, and urea mineral supplement. The supplementation levels ranged from 0 to 1.6% body weight (BW), and the effects of type and level of supplementation were examined during both dry and wet seasons. The meta-analysis was performed using mixed models. Cattle grazing tropical pastures during the wet season had higher average daily gain (ADG) than that in the dry season (0.81 vs. 0.56 kg/day). In response to supplementation, cattle receiving >1.0% BW of energetic supplement in the wet season had the greatest gain per hectare (GPH; 8.16 kg/ha per day) and daily stocking rate (DSR; 2045 kg BW/ha/day). In the dry season, protein supplementation at rates >0.5% BW provided higher GPH (on average 2.33 kg/ha per day). Neither level nor type of supplement altered the DSR in the dry season (on average 883 kg/ha per day). Estimated regression showed that the ADG of beef cattle increased by 0.308 kg for each 1% of supplement intake. Increased supplementation intake by beef cattle grazing tropical pastures resulted in greater ADG in the warm season, whereas offering energy supplementation at rates >1.0% BW during the wet season as well as protein supplementation at rates >0.5% BW during the dry season increased gain per area.